fbpx
Politics Foreign Affairs Culture Fellows Program

Misunderstanding Tolkien

So Robert Rodi has apparently never read The Two Towers: Peter Jackson triumphed with his earlier “Lord of the Rings” trilogy because that immediacy — that urgency — miraculously came through, being only occasionally undercut by modern ironic moments (as in Legolas and Gimli’s competition to see who can tally up the most kills in […]

So Robert Rodi has apparently never read The Two Towers:

Peter Jackson triumphed with his earlier “Lord of the Rings” trilogy because that immediacy — that urgency — miraculously came through, being only occasionally undercut by modern ironic moments (as in Legolas and Gimli’s competition to see who can tally up the most kills in any given battle).

If this is Rodi’s best example of a “modern ironic moment” in Jackson’s movies, he should reconsider his entire argument. The competition between Gimli and Legolas is part of Tolkien’s original story. Jackson expanded on the competition and continued it in the third movie, but the friendly rivalry between the two was an important element in the characters’ relationship in the second book of the trilogy. Rodi wants to create the impression that the new adaptation of The Hobbit is infusing the story with too much “modern irony” (which seems to be the wrong word for what he’s objecting to), but he clearly isn’t familiar enough with Tolkien’s own work to recognize which parts of his stories were created by the author and which were added or modified by the screenwriters.

×

Donate to The American Conservative Today

This is not a paywall!

Your support helps us continue our mission of providing thoughtful, independent journalism. With your contribution, we can maintain our commitment to principled reporting on the issues that matter most.

Donate Today:

Donate to The American Conservative Today