fbpx
Politics Foreign Affairs Culture Fellows Program

Why Does The NEA Want Kids To Learn Butthole-Licking?

Disgusting documents show top teacher's union LGBTQ caucus provides lesson plans in perversion
Why Does The NEA Want Kids To Learn Butthole-Licking?

I apologize for being gross, but it's necessary. You have to be shocked into recognizing the moral horror of what a part of the nation's largest teacher's union is doing. It is unspeakable, but we have to speak about it.

The most effective work that the irreplaceable Christopher Rufo does is simply to get documents from institutions, and post them in full to the web, so ordinary people can see what kind of corrupt, racist or otherwise depraved people run these institutions. His latest is from the LGBTQ+ caucus of the National Education Association (NEA), the country's largest teachers union, representing three million teachers nationwide.

Advertisement

Here is a link to Rufo's entire report.

Look at the sex ed webpage from that caucus.

Here's a link to the NEA-promoted video to help teachers learn how to teach sex to teens, titled:

Advertisement

Screenshots from the video:

More:

Dear heteronormies, "rimming" is the act of licking the bunghole of one's partner. Or, let the NEA-linked educational website explain it in detail:

This poor guy is sad that he didn't make the roster -- as well he shouldn't have, because we talk about this all the time:

They don't make teachers like they used to, do they?

In case the video isn't sufficient, the NEA-recommended resource provides this handy handout:

There's more, says Rufo:

These. Are. Teachers.

And the ones promoting this are evil people. They just are: evil. And they want your kid's heart and mind.

This didn't start yesterday. This started as far back as the year 2000. I wrote about it in The Weekly Standard. A couple of angry parents went to a state-supported workshop for teenagers at which they were taught sexual "awareness". Excerpts:

Frustrated by official indifference, Whiteman secretly took his tape recorder along to the 10th annual conference of the Boston chapter of GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, at Tufts University on March 25. GLSEN (pronounced "glisten") is a national organization whose purpose is to train teachers and students and develop programs to, in the words of its Boston chapter leader, "challenge the anti-gay, hetero-centric culture that still prevails in our schools."

The state-sanctioned conference, which was open to the public but attended chiefly by students, administrators, and teachers, undercut the official GLSEN line -- that their work is aimed only at making schools safer by teaching tolerance and respect.

The event, backed by the state's largest teachers' union, included such workshops as "Ask the Transsexuals," "Early Childhood Educators: How to Decide Whether to Come Out at Work or Not," "The Struggles and Triumphs of Including Homosexuality in a Middle School Curriculum" (with suggestions for including gay issues when teaching the Holocaust), "From Lesbos to Stonewall: Incorporating Sexuality into a World History Curriculum," and "Creating a Safe and Inclusive Community in Elementary Schools," in which the "Rationale for integrating glbt [gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender] issues in the early elementary years will be presented."

Whiteman sat in on a "youth only, ages 14-21" workshop called "What They Didn't Tell You About Queer Sex & Sexuality in Health Class." If "they" didn't tell you about this stuff, it's probably because "they" worried they'd be sent to jail.

The raucous session was led by Massachusetts Department of Education employees Margot Abels and Julie Netherland, and Michael Gaucher, an AIDS educator from the Massachusetts public health agency. Gaucher opened the session by asking the teens how they know whether or not they've had sex. Someone asked whether oral sex was really sex.

"If that's not sex, then the number of times I've had sex has dramatically decreased, from a mountain to a valley, baby!" squealed Gaucher. He then coaxed a reluctant young participant to talk about which orifices need to be filled for sex to have occurred: "Don't be shy, honey, you can do it."

Later, the three adults took written questions from the kids. One inquired about "fisting," a sex practice in which one inserts his hand and forearm into the rectum of his partner. The helpful and enthusiastic Gaucher demonstrated the proper hand position for this act. Abels described fisting as "an experience of letting somebody into your body that you want to be that close and intimate with," and praised it for putting one "into an exploratory mode."

Gaucher urged the teens to consult their "really hip" Gay/Straight Alliance adviser for hints on how to come on to a potential sex partner. The trio went on to explain that lesbians could indeed experience sexual bliss through rubbing their clitorises together, and Gaucher told the kids that male ejaculate is rumored to taste "sweeter if people eat celery." On and on like this the session went.

How vanilla all that sounds today. You would have thought the public would be grateful to these two dads for telling the truth about how the state and its agents were colonizing the minds of kids with this filth. But no. The Boston media, the legal establishment, and even the state's Republican governor came down on them. More:

But will their expose ultimately make a difference? GLSEN/Boston boasts the most advanced programs of its kind in the nation. As goes Massachusetts, in time, so may go the rest of America. Camenker and Whiteman are on the front lines of a battle likely to spread to school districts from coast to coast, as the powerful GLSEN organization, with sponsorship money from American Airlines, Dockers Khakis, and Kodak, presses its radical agenda under the innocent-sounding guise of "safety," "human rights," and "suicide prevention."

"That money goes down a rathole to fund gay clubs in schools, and gay rallies and conferences," fumes Camenker. "None of the people who get the money are legitimate suicide prevention groups. They're all these gay groups."

GLSEN will be holding its annual leadership training conference next month in San Francisco, to be preceded by a two-day workshop teaching students and educators how to push the gay agenda in local schools -- even at the kindergarten level -- as a human rights issue. Books available from the GLSEN website include Queering Elementary Education and Preventing Prejudice, a collection of elementary-school lesson plans built around themes such as "What Is a Boy/Girl?" and "Freedom to Marry."

Schools' surreptitiously introducing this material to students, says Whiteman, "puts kids at risk and puts parents completely out of the loop with the sexual identities of their children. The schools take this elitist attitude that they know best."

The point of this activist drive, warns Camenker, is to desensitize children to gay sex at a very young age and counteract moral instruction to the contrary given by their parents and religious leaders. If you protest, he warns, be prepared to be stonewalled and sneered at by school officials, smeared in the press, and denounced as a hatemonger and a bigot by gay activists.

Yet what choice is left to parents but to fight? "We're facing an incredible evil here. It chills you to the bone," says Camenker, an Orthodox Jew brought closer to his faith by this struggle. "The only way we're not going to get run over is if people wake up to what's happening to our children."

Well, these two brave dads lost. Now what was allowed in Boston twenty-two years ago is mainstream nationwide -- and today, much worse has been embraced by the nation's largest teachers union.

How far is too far? There is no such thing as too far for these sexual radicals, and the morally vacant allies they have among the corps of teachers, and in the media. Let it sink in: the National Education Association has produced materials encouraging school children to lick each other's buttholes for sexual pleasure. And worse!

It all started with the lie that GLSEN had to bring its message into schools to make them "safe" from bullying. Nobody likes bullying, and nobody wants to be seen as indifferent to bullying. So people who should have known better allowed GLSEN to come in. And now look.

This is supposedly about the dignity of gays, lesbians, bisexual, and transgendered people? Bull. It's about total degradation of the moral sense of minor children -- and the adults, who ought to be looking out for them, allowing it to happen. I bet not one parent in a thousand understands what this is really all about. They think that their kids are only going to be learning how to treat LGBT people with fairness and dignity. The fools. These radical sex activists should never, ever, ever have been allowed into the public schools. They ought to be driven out by angry parents who are tired of being gaslighted about "safety" and "inclusion" as code words meaning "we want your kids to become as perverse as we are."

When can we have a backlash? When is somebody going to ask NEA chief Becky Pringle, pictured above at this fall's NEA conference, why she thinks kids ought to learn about rimming and fisting and BDSM? And: when is the Republican Party going to make an issue of this filth?

Comments

Become a Member today for a growing stake in the conservative movement.
Join here!
Join here
6stringfury
6stringfury
Sadly, I feel that the purveyors will keep doing it until they are physically scared of doing it because it might result in their bodily harm.
At this point they feel empowered in taking a wrecking ball to civilization. Sooner or later, they're to try to shove this down the throats of the wrong group....likely some devout Muslims. In places like Dearborn. Let's see what happens then....
schedule 4 days ago
ncube7
ncube7
Sexualizing children is child abuse. The Western world forbids child abuse because we want to protect the innocence of children. We know that innocence leads to a well-balanced, functional adult mind. These twisted educators lack that moral perspective, they don't follow the Christian motto of doing good unto others, as you would have them do unto you. Instead, they follow the Marxist worldview, take power and don't let go. For them, there are no morals, everything is about gaining power over others. Here they are simply wielding power over the children. When you sexualize children, you confuse them and weaken their resolve. This makes them impressionable to an ideology. (Boys = Girls, sure why not.) The Communists have done this kind of thing before. They offer no moral framework for the protection for women and children. They brainwash people into submission to their ideology. Communism is a horrible thing.

Without Christianity, there is a different world order. According to Wikipedia, this is how the Communists lived in Yugoslavia after the Soviet Union collapsed:
"We live surrounded by newly opened porno shops, porno magazines, peepshows, stripteases, unemployment and galloping poverty [...] Romanian women are prostituting themselves for a single dollar in towns on the Romanian-Yugoslav border. In the midst of all this, our anti-choice nationalist governments are threatening our right to abortion and telling us to multiply, to give birth to more Poles, Hungarians, Czechs, Croats, Slovaks."
— How We Survived Communism and Even Laughed (1993)[42]
schedule 3 days ago
Lloyd Conway
Lloyd Conway
It's doubtful that any of us will ever be called to serve on a jury in a trial over crimes such as those reported here. It is, however, one more reason to serve when called and not to try and get out of serving when called. Once in a great while, someone who is morally sane may be in the right place at the right time to make sure that justice is done.
schedule 2 days ago
Jonesy
Jonesy
Listening to a scholarly podcast the other day from a historian who said that this country could only function with a religious people…guess those religious identity polls are correct.
schedule 6 hrs ago