fbpx
Politics Foreign Affairs Culture Fellows Program

The Bogus ‘Emergency’ and the War on Yemen

At each step, Pompeo & Company have sought to avoid oversight and accountability.
Mike Pompeo

The State Department attempted to spin the results of the Inspector General investigation into the bogus emergency that Pompeo declared to expedite arms sales to the Saudis and the UAE last year, but the full report included some damning details about Pompeo’s disregard for civilian life in Yemen:

The State Department did not fully consider the risk of civilian casualties when it approved more than $8 billion in arms sales to Middle Eastern countries last year, according to a redacted inspector general report released Tuesday.

An unredacted version of the report, obtained by POLITICO, also raised questions about Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s assertions that an emergency situation existed, allowing him to greenlight the sales over congressional objections.

The risk to civilians from the weapons that the U.S. has been selling the Saudis and the UAE is the main reason why these arms sales have encountered such strong resistance from Congress. It is not surprising that Pompeo’s State Department did not weigh this risk seriously, because their priority has been to get the weapons to the Saudi coalition no matter what the coalition does with them. That is why Pompeo previously certified that the Saudi coalition was seeking to reduce harm to civilians when all of the evidence and the majority of his own officials said the opposite: he wanted to protect current and future arms sales at any cost. The purpose of abusing the emergency declaration last year was to avoid Congressional scrutiny, because it is undeniable that the Saudis and the UAE have been and would be using these weapons to commit war crimes against innocent people in Yemen. Because the Trump administration could not defend its indefensible Yemen policy, they sought to go around Congress by abusing this provision in the law governing arms exports.

It is significant that the IG report does not give an evaluation of Pompeo’s decision to declare an emergency, so the report does not and cannot exonerate Pompeo on the most important question. The Post reports:

Because the Arms Export Control Act does not define the word “emergency,” the report said, the IG did not evaluate whether Pompeo’s stated reason — aggression from Iran — constituted one. But in making the emergency declaration, it said, the State Department did not meet other requirements to “fully assess risks and implement mitigation measures to reduce civilian casualties and legal concerns associated with the transfer of” precision-guided munitions.

The declaration itself was technically executed as it was supposed to be, but that’s beside the point. The report makes no determination as to whether the reason for making that declaration was valid. Pompeo is hiding behind a technicality and hoping that no one notices the truth. The truth is that Pompeo put fueling the war on Yemen and arming the Saudis and the UAE over protecting the lives of civilians in Yemen. That is presumably why the most damning findings in the report were not part of the public release:

But details of the IG’s findings and the department’s response to the civilian casualty concerns were not part of the public release. They were instead part of a classified annex to the report, following a claim of “executive branch confidentiality interests, including executive privilege,” according to a cover letter signed by acting inspector general Diana R. Shaw.

Some parts of the annex, provided to Congress, were “inappropriately redacted,” House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot L. Engel (D-N.Y.) said in a Tuesday letter to committee members. He said he would seek a reversal of the blackouts.

Other details in the report show that most of the weapons hadn’t been delivered yet and some wouldn’t be for a year or more, so they could have nothing to do with an emergency situation:

Other redactions deal with when the weapons were actually provided. According to blacked-out portions of the report, at the time of the IG review last fall only four of 22 arms transfers included in the emergency had been transferred. “Precision-guided munitions were among the first items delivered,” one redaction said.

Delivery of 11 of the 22 was scheduled to begin before the end of 2019, and five “would not begin delivery until 2020 or later,” according to redacted portions. In a letter to the inspector general, attached to the report, Cooper said that “the Certification itself was perhaps the most major ‘deliverable,’” apparently as a reflection of administration support for the Saudis.

At each step, Pompeo and the administration have sought to avoid oversight, accountability, and transparency when it comes to their support for the war on Yemen. First, Pompeo lied to Congress in 2018 that the Saudis and their allies were trying to reduce harm to civilians. That bogus certification came just weeks after the massacre of 40 schoolboys at Dahyan carried out by coalition jets using U.S.-made weapons. Then last spring the administration used the bogus emergency declaration to get around Congressional opposition to additional arms sales, and then when there is an investigation into that abuse the department tries to cover up the embarrassing details by redacting things that shouldn’t be concealed.

An unredacted copy of the report shows that they were discussing using an emergency declaration for weeks before Pompeo claimed that there was an emergency:

Parts of the publicly released report were also blacked out, including those related to the timing of Pompeo’s emergency declaration. According to an unredacted copy obtained by The Washington Post, State Department staff first proposed the use of the emergency authority to bypass congressional restrictions on April 3, 2019, nearly two months before Pompeo, on May 24, told Congress that emergency action was required.

Obviously the administration was looking for a way to skirt Congress, and abusing the emergency provision in the law was their way of doing that. They then cooked up the bogus emergency, citing threats from Iran in keeping with their general obsession with that country, and pushed through arms sales that would have been rejected if they had come before Congress.

This is still very much a live issue. The war has not ended, and U.S. arms sales continue. The administration’s determination to aid and abet war criminals has not wavered. The Saudi coalition continues to use the weapons they buy from the U.S. and others to bomb Yemen and kill civilians. Just last week, an airstrike on a group of civilians traveling by road killed 9 children. That latest slaughter of civilians occurred just a few weeks after the U.N. shamefully removed Saudi Arabia from its blacklist of governments that kill children in wartime. Congress must keep pressing the administration to cut off support for the Saudi coalition, and the public must demand that our government end its despicable backing for this indefensible war.

Advertisement

Comments

Become a Member today for a growing stake in the conservative movement.
Join here!
Join here

The Bogus ‘Emergency’ and the War on Yemen

The "emergency" is a lie in service to an evil cause.
yemen bombing

Even Lindsey Graham is so disgusted by Trump’s bogus arms sales “emergency” that he wants to close that loophole in the law:

One of President Trump’s closest congressional allies is ready to strip him of certain emergency powers in response to the administration sidestepping lawmakers to secure 22 arms sales benefiting Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

“Do away with the emergency exception,” Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) said Wednesday. Doing so, he added, would prevent the executive branch from repeating such a move in the future. “I would not have agreed to that before, but after this maneuver by the administration, count me in.”

It is a measure of how outrageous the Trump administration’s phony “emergency” is that even such a reliable hard-liner and Trump ally as Graham is opposed to it. Graham is a supporter of the war on Yemen, and he has generally had no problem with U.S. arms sales to despotic clients in the past, but the president’s attempt to make an end-run around Congress is such an egregious abuse of power that he can’t count on Graham’s support in this matter. When it comes to Trump’s handling of the relationships with the Saudis and the UAE, the president has done such a horrible job and has treated Congress with contempt so many times that he is driving his closest allies into the opposing camp.

The loophole in the Arms Export Control Act was an invitation to abuse, and in Trump we have a president eager to exploit every available opening. Congress needs to close off that opening so that this president and future ones can’t abuse it in similar fashion. It has taken too long for Congress to stand up to the president’s abuses, but this is a promising sign that they aren’t going to put up with them any longer.

As I mentioned earlier, there is equally strong opposition on the House side:

The panel’s chairman, Rep. Eliot L. Engel (D-N.Y.), began the hearing with R. Clarke Cooper, the assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs, by accusing the administration of creating a “phony” emergency to justify the sales.

“Here’s the reality: There is no emergency,” Engel said. “It’s made up. And it’s an abuse of the law.”

Everyone can see that the emergency is fake, and more important leading members of Congress are willing to excoriate administration officials publicly for the obvious lie. We all understand that the administration resorted to this obnoxious abuse of power because they have already lost the argument over arms sales to the Saudis and Emiratis, and they lost because there is no case to be made for continuing to arm war criminals as they massacre civilians in Yemen. Like the cowardly and cynical Congressional Republican leaders that desperately tried to prevent a vote on the antiwar Yemen resolution, the Trump administration is afraid to debate these arms sales on the merits because they know the majority is against them. Luckily, in their arrogant attempt to short-circuit the process and avoid Congressional review they have turned even more members of Congress against them.

The “emergency” lie is tied up with the larger lie that is administration Yemen policy. They claim that providing the Saudis and the UAE with precision-guided weapons reduces the risk to civilians, but that ignores the fact that the Saudi coalition routinely launches attacks on civilian targets on purpose. Sending more weapons to governments that massacre civilians obviously cannot reduce the risk to civilians. It guarantees more civilian deaths. We know in advance that these weapons will be used to commit war crimes, and by trying to rush these weapons to the war criminals the Trump administration is giving a green light to more massacres, deepening U.S. complicity in these crimes, and announcing to the entire world that the administration’s support for the Saudi coalition is unconditional. The “emergency” is a lie in service to an evil cause, and all members of Congress should reject it.

Advertisement

Comments

Become a Member today for a growing stake in the conservative movement.
Join here!
Join here