Georgia: Whose Country Is It Anyway?
In the country of Georgia, Parliament is considering a bill that would require NGOs that get over 20 percent of their funding from abroad to register as foreign agents. The bill passed today, over a threatened presidential veto. There were protests on the streets. And lo, a top Color Revolutionary herself weighed in last week:
If you follow the link to the news story, you’ll see that the Georgian president opposes the bill because it would hurt European integration. But what business is it of Europe or the US as to whether or not Georgia wants to regulate the activities of foreign-funded NGOs in its own sovereign territory? This bill might not be wise — I don’t know enough about the details to say — but it’s not at all surprising that countries see how Washington and Brussels use soft power through NGOs to manipulate the political processes in those countries, and want to protect themselves from it. I wrote at TAC the other day about how the aptly named Power showed up in Budapest last month to announce a $20 million commitment to fund initiatives in Hungary clearly aimed at undermining the democratically elected government of Viktor Orban.
The US Embassy in Georgia called the legislation "Kremlin-inspired" and said it was incompatible with the country's desire to join the European Union. "Today is a dark day for Georgia's democracy," the embassy said in a statement, adding that the legislation raised questions about "the ruling party's commitment to Euro-Atlantic integration".
US State Department spokesman Ned Price said the draft legislation would be a tremendous setback and "would strike at some of the very rights that are central to the aspirations of the people of Georgia", BBC reported.
European Union foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said the draft law was a "very bad development" for the country and could seriously affect its ties with the EU.
Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have said the legislation would impede rights to freedom of expression and association in the country with onerous financial reporting requirements.
“The 'foreign agent' bills seek to marginalize and discredit independent, foreign-funded groups and media that serve the wider public interest in Georgia," said Hugh Williamson, Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch.
Who defines “the wider public interest in Georgia”? The bill is backed by the majority party in the Georgian parliament, which has enough support to override a presidential veto. Who is more representative of the “wider public interest” there: lawmakers democratically elected by the public, or foreign governments and NGOs? These people think they have the right to go into a country and work to undermine its democratically elected governments, its laws, and its cultural traditions -- and anybody who tries to stop it is a stooge of Putin. Are we looking at the beginning of a Second Rose Revolution?
Here is a map of the region. Notice where Georgia is — on the far right, below Russia:
Georgia wants to join the EU and NATO. The new proposed law would make that more difficult, it is claimed by the US and EU, who want Georgia to join the EU and NATO. I have no strong opinion about Georgia and the EU, except to warn the devoutly Orthodox Christian nation -- one that I am very eager to visit as a religious pilgrim -- that Brussels will try to eradicate laws and policies based on Christian faith convictions. (Ask Hungarians and Poles about LGBT and family matters.)
Subscribe Today
Get daily emails in your inbox
As for NATO, one certainly sympathizes with Georgia’s fear of Russian imperialist power, but how can it possibly be a vital national security interest of the United States to be committed to fighting World War III on behalf of a Caucasus nation whose capital, Tbilisi, is slightly farther east than — wait for it — Baghdad?
(Readers, this is one of six items on today's edition of Rod Dreher's Diary. As you know, Friday is the final day this blog will appear at TAC. If you'd like to keep up with my news, analysis, commentary, and such, as well as participate in a smart and diverse comments section, please subscribe for $5/month or $50/year.)
This is of course another example of progressive/liberal hypocrisy. They wouldn't want Russia to spend as much as $10 on some crummy Facebook ads in favor of its preferred candidates in a US election, but squeal like pigs when Georgia decides that they should launder millions of dollars to influence its own. The squealing is appreciated though because it reminds us that money is their only god, and hitting their money is the surest way to cripple them. That is wisdom that needs to be applied domestically.
Surely there is a country that a future regime can extradite Power and a few of her underlings and compatriots to, that will be happy to rot her in a jail cell for the rest of her life.
Georgia would be a fool to lean to much on the West, in any case. Our bosses discard mercenaries like the Kurds when they're done using them, and if a popular regime takes over, Georgia is simply WAY too far for us to be interested in at all. The obvious counterbalance to Russia, geographically, is Turkey. And Turkey is the more eager player in the Caucasus lately anyways.
This is not a battle between the dark forces of Brussels vs the light of Orthodoxy, like some cheesy Star Wars script. This is a case of a corrupted government, likely under the payroll of the Kremlin, undoing decades of progress and sabotaging a small country's future.
BTW, imperial Russia nullified Georgia's autocephaly, banned the Georgian liturgy, destroyed ancient murals, etc in the 18th century under the guise of Russification. Russia is Georgia's immediate existential threat. Not the West. The people in the streets aren't doing the bidding of foreign NGO's. They're Orthodox Georgians trying to save their country. And they are, by far, the majority. Go there, Mr Dreher, and you will see for yourself.
I wouldn't call Christian Orthodoxy "cheesy," either. As for payoffs, isn't that what our country does, through both official foreign aid and covert support of its proxies? Recall the Afghan President revealing that he got a private $1 million slush fund from the American government, every month? How about Veep Biden bragging he got the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Hunter's company there fired for $1 billion of our tax money?
We know that one foreign intelligence agency conducts such paid "hasbara" operations. Since these commenters echo the same talking points, it seems likely. Moreover, officials now blatantly lie, in the same obvious manner redolent of the late Soviet regime, so deception has become as ubiquitous as Rod Dreher warned. We are living by lies, with many loving the lies too.
As far as your last comment.....wow. A little much.