Forget Davos Elites: Trump’s Protectionism is a Threat to His Own Voters
As world leaders gather in Davos, Switzerland for the annual World Economic Forum, a narrative has taken shape that Trumpism is leading to the decline of the United States’ diplomatic importance. Davos, after all, is a gathering of globalists who tend to favor free trade and open borders, the antithesis of what Trump stands for. The truth is certainly more nuanced than some hysterical American columnists are making it out to be, yet the United States is becoming more protectionist, and all things considered, France and Germany are right to criticize Trump’s economic policy.
At the World Economic Forum, French president Emmanuel Macron declared that “France is back. France is back at the core of Europe, because we will never have any French success without a European success.” There is some undeniable truth in that: France heavily relies on European consumers and investors, be it German airlines flying French Airbus planes or the London Tube being run by French-made Alstom wagons. France makes €82.6 billion ($102.5 billion) on tourism and exports €9.2 billion ($11.4 billion) of its agricultural production. Macron’s political adversary Marine Le Pen might be correct that France could technically rely on itself for its own consumption, but should it opt for total isolation it certainly wouldn’t be among the big global players.
The same thing can be said for any other European country: as European nations opened up to trade, they’ve seen more prosperity and have been less inclined to start trade wars, or actual wars for that matter. Brexit was a blow to the European Union as a political project, yet as of now, it seems like both Britain and the EU agree at least that trade relations are essential for everyone.
Donald Trump’s protectionism stands in stark contrast, not only to this European experience, but to years of American leadership. For decades, the United States has been a driving force for free trade because its leaders recognized that all parties involved benefitted from opened and enhanced trade relations. Yet for Trump, free-trade deals seem to be mostly a political tool, used to reward his friends with loyalty, as he did when he called for a “beautiful” trade agreement with the United Kingdom after Brexit.
Trump, who continuously invoked “the forgotten men and women” during his successful presidential campaign, needs to know that it’s especially low-income households that will suffer from his protectionism. Tariffs hurt the poorest of the poor. A recent research paper on American tariffs explains why:
It appears tariffs are imposed in a regressive manner—in part because expenditures on traded goods are a higher share of income and non-housing consumption among lower income households, but also due to explicit regressivity.
In plain English, tariffs fall disproportionately on those least able to afford them. The paper concludes that tariffs cost those who make the least about 1.5 percent of their disposable incomes, which is far more than the highest earners in society, for whom that number is less than 0.3 percent.
Not only is Trump’s mercantilism not good economics, it is also diplomatically unwise, as trade and geopolitical relations are linked. The president of the United States can say and do many things, but if he makes trade more difficult, he also seriously marginalizes American interests abroad.
This is not to say that confident Europeans aren’t considerably overestimating their momentum. Emmanuel Macron’s EU reform ideas haven’t found many supporters outside of Brussels, Angela Merkel still hasn’t formed a government after an election last September, Italy faces a major election showdown in March, and the United Kingdom and the EU have stalled Brexit trade negotiations by making them overly political.
It is certainly true that Europe is performing well economically, especially Central and Eastern European countries, most of which have seen GDP growth of more than 3 percent (Romania is currently at 6.4 percent). However, the idea that economic growth translates into support for a European superstate, as many EU elites do, is certainly a stretch. In fact, a 2017 poll shows that 66 percent of EU citizens are dissatisfied with the direction of the EU: 62 percent in France, 72 percent in Germany and 83 percent in Italy. In the same poll, 44 percent of Italians said they would vote to leave the EU outright. With one state out of the EU and others considering the same, it’s hard to imagine how European elites think their federalist agenda has been vindicated of late.
Yet despite all this, Trump’s protectionism has still given Europe the moral high ground, even if it’s just at Davos this weekend. The United States is at risk of ejecting itself from the world stage in pursuit of the vague slogan that is “America First,” despite free trade having long been at the core of America’s foreign policy. You don’t have to be a fan of Macron and Merkel (there are plenty of reasons not to be) to recognize this. The United States should step back and learn from the European experience that free trade is not a threat to local economies, that it indeed enriches society. Let’s hope that America will not learn this lesson the hard way through economic stagnation.
Bill Wirtz is a Young Voices advocate. His work has appeared in Newsweek, the Washington Examiner, CityAM, CapX, the Mises Institute, Le Monde, and Le Figaro.