Home/Articles/Realism & Restraint/Does Joe Biden Keep Canada Safe at Night?

Does Joe Biden Keep Canada Safe at Night?

Mass death abroad is the norm of U.S. foreign policy, but our closest ally shows a different way forward.

Blaine, Washington, United States, North America

We know what keeps America safe at night—rough men on walls stand ready to visit violence on those who would do us harm, duh. But what about Canada? Or say, Cambodia or Bolivia? How do they stay safe?

This is by way of trying to figure out why Joe Biden bombed Syria and derailed the resumption of the Iran nuclear accord, and why he has called off, delayed, or stalled further withdrawals from the places along the bloody trail of the old Global War on Terror. Canada (along with Cambodia, Bolivia, and most others) never sent any of their rough men to most of those places to begin with, absent Afghanistan, where some Canadian forces were deployed until 2014, a long 7 years ago. Their peak was only about 2,000 soldiers anyway. Elsewhere, Canada maintains a handful of small foreign logistical outposts. They’re not fighting anyone anywhere.

The U.S. famously has some 800 bases strewn around the globe, with troops in 150 countries, and boasts that its special forces are deployed in 82 nations during any given week. Last year they operated in 72 percent of the nations on this planet, including 13 African nations. Can you name them? Why were Americans risking their lives in Burkina Faso? So we can sleep better?

Few expected much from Joe Biden foreign policy-wise, and he has delivered. About a month into office he bombed Syria. The ostensible justification was the target was not “Syrian” but 22 people associated with Iran. Militias in Iraq allegedly under Iran’s control killed an American contractor in Erbil, so the bombing in Syria was retaliation for that. This was not only supposed to be a legal, moral, and ethical act by the Home of Democracy©, it was supposed to have accomplished something toward Americans being safer. It did not; a U.S. airbase in Iraq was rocketed a few days later.

Imagine Chinese aircraft flying halfway around the world and killing 22 people in Detroit in retaliation for something that happened in, wherever, Thailand. That OK? Whatever nations are looking to China for “leadership” (one of the things Biden was to restore after Trump broke it) might not be sure. China is an interesting example, because they did not retaliate against the United States for bombing their embassy in the former Yugoslavia in 1999. As in 1988 when an American cruiser shot down a civilian Iran Air flight, killing all 290 people on board, Washington just said it was a mistake. The world is encouraged to accept America does bad things for good reasons. Or no reason at all. Talk about uniqueness.

If I thought like a Canadian, I would find it difficult to understand why the U.S. has to fight everyone. It is very hard to imagine America has enemies who need killing in 72 percent of the nations on earth. Or maybe not—after decades of invading, bombing, and regime changing, maybe they really do hate us. The relationship between the U.S. bombing people and people not caring for the U.S. seems as unclear to Joe Biden as it did to most of his predecessors.

Thinking like an American, the ostensible reason for all this bombing seems to be Hitler. He’s why we couldn’t support Trump’s nuclear diplomacy with North Korea, why no other president has even tried for 20 years, and why Biden seems reluctant to revive the Iran nuclear accord. In 1938, old-timey British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain got hoodwinked by Hitler. No American president wants to be Neville Chamberlain. So every bad guy in the world, whether Saddam Hussein, Kim Jong Un, Vladimir Putin, Muammar Gaddafi, Bashar Assad, and Fidel Castro even while dead, is Hitler.

It follows, then, that every friction point is Munich 1938 and the only way to deal with it without appearing Chamberlain-weak is to attack just one more country. When actual fighting cannot be on the table, presidents are content with crippling sanctions, a kind of economic Guantanamo as have been in place against Cuba since about when the Beatles first came to America, even before that for North Korea, and since roller disco was popular in the case of Iran.

It works, at least as far as politicians are concerned. They don’t look like Neville Chamberlain. They hardly ever suffer any consequences. There is absolutely no demand for accountability (the new Washington watch word) for any act of war committed by any American president, including those who lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and created a global torture system the actual Hitler would have been happy to have franchised.

Foreign policy in general is not a constraint on policymakers, because most of the public doesn’t care about it (quick, find Burkina Faso on a map). Those that do care usually are pretty supportive of America’s wars, love the troops, and all that. Washington and the media help out, spending most of a decade propagandizing post-9/11, for example, and that stain doesn’t wash out easy. The thing that finally turned the country against the Vietnam War, the draft of nice white middle-class kids, is gone. Also gone are the waves of (American) body bags, as much of modern killing is death from way above.

The other reasons Joe Biden bombed Syria are equally familiar and equally false. We have backed away from, “we need to protect the oil,” since the first Bush Gulf War in 1991, though the phrase had a good run. Still out there is some version of, “fight them over there so we don’t have to fight them over here.” No one has invaded the U.S. since 1812, and on 9/11 guys with box cutters worked around the $305.4 billion 2001 military budget. People on the left used to talk about “The American Empire” but even that has turned out to be pretty weak; we don’t imperially profit by raping conquered lands like a proper empire does. Where is our Raj? Our rubber plantations and breadfruit farms? America got no oil from Iraq and no minerals from Afghanistan.

We, instead, mostly wreck places (Libya and Vietnam come to mind) and then abandon them, or grab a little land for yet another overseas base. Americans sometimes talk like it’s all a great game of Risk, but war to simply grab resources and territory isn’t how things have worked for a long time. Other justifications? Ask any still living Iraqi how “spreading democracy” worked out. Stopping various genocides comes up from time to time, though when a real one came along in Rwanda the U.S. wasn’t up for it.

Oh, yeah, Biden is the leader of the free world. Was there a vote? Because, if so, it’s likely Andrea Merkel would have won. Did America get tasked by the good countries to protect them? As if Canada couldn’t build a nuke if it wanted one. And who is threatening them anyway? The Canadian military could invade Burkina Faso if Canadians wished to. They just don’t wish to.

The fallback justification since 1945 has been the myth that the U.S. is engaged in some global muscle-tussle to be the most powerful place. It used to be just Russia, but lately China seems to be the one we imagine challenging us everywhere while still owning one of the largest foreign shares of American debt and making nearly everything sold in our stores. When was the last time China shot at us, never mind invaded us? Some may even remember we already defeated a globalist Russia once before (Google “the Cold War, we won”).

In addition to leading the world in bombing, America is also the leading global arms dealer. Military spending absorbs over half of the federal government’s discretionary budget, meaning more money is spent on the Pentagon than on schools, infrastructure, climate, and diplomacy combined. So, that may also have something to do with all this.

Most of Joe Biden’s foreign policy team are brutalist leftovers from the Obama administration, the one that invaded Libya and set the ball rolling in Syria and Ukraine. They’re needed in 2021 about as much as mimes at a funeral.

Head of the gang is Victoria Nuland, who worked to start her own war in Ukraine a few years ago. Supporting her are Tony “Global Policeman” Blinken and Susan Rice, she of invading Libya fame. Maybe the Class of 2016 will finally have those full-on wars they have always wanted but a stronger president like Obama sort of resisted. Bloody Nuland says more wars are basically a requirement. She co-wrote “Superpowers Don’t Get To Retire,” proclaiming “there is no democratic superpower waiting in the wings to save the world if this democratic superpower falters.” With policy friends like this, it’s clear why Biden bombed Syria.

“America is back,” Biden bleats. What that means America is back to business as usual, and that means people abroad are going to die.

Peter Van Buren is the author of We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi PeopleHooper’s War: A Novel of WWII Japan, and Ghosts of Tom Joad: A Story of the 99 Percent.

leave a comment

Latest Articles