Politics Foreign Affairs Culture We're Hiring

Are White People Bloodsucking Devils?

In college, 1619 Project's Nikole Hannah-Jones penned racist screed. Does she believe these things today? When did she stop?
The 75th Annual Peabody Awards Ceremony - Arrivals

Here’s a letter to the editor of the campus newspaper written by Nikole Hannah-Jones (then Nicole Hannah) in 1995, when she was a student at Notre Dame:

(Via The Federalist)

She went on to become the Pulitzer Prize-winning genius behind The New York Times‘s 1619 Project, which claims that slavery is the basis of the American founding. Recently a critic on Twitter said the recent riots ought to be known as the “1619 Riots” — a distinction Hannah-Jones accepted with pride, but then deleted her tweet.

As far as we know, there has been no discipline of Hannah-Jones within the Times. Publishing an op-ed from a Republican senator calling for troop deployment to stop rioting is the kind of thing that gets you fired at the Times. But if you publicly welcome the branding of those riots as a spinoff of the Times‘s signature project — hey, no problem!

I don’t think it’s fair to hold what Hannah-Jones wrote in college against her. To be sure, there’s no doubt that if a similar college-newspaper letter by Ross Douthat or David Brooks were unearthed, Nikole Hannah-Jones would be leading the mob calling for their firing and public ruin. But I believe across the board that people should not be held responsible today for things they wrote as students over two decades ago. Furthermore, in charity, I assume that she no longer believes that whites, as a race, are “bloodsuckers” and “devils.” I could be wrong, but again, in charity, I will assume that she no longer believes these racist things. What I would like to hear from her is when and how she ceased to believe them, if she in fact has. What changed her mind?

I would very much like to know how her moral judgment changed since then. And I think people ought to be asking this. If it’s fair not to hold her responsible for racist things she wrote in the 1990s, it’s also fair to ask her how she matured past those beliefs — again, assuming that she has. Surely The New York Times would not wish to employ a racist. Surely the Times deplores all racism, and makes no exception for anti-white racism. Surely.



Want to join the conversation?

Subscribe for as little as $5/mo to start commenting on Rod’s blog.

Join Now