James P. Pinkerton is a contributor to the Fox News Channel and a TAC contributing editor.
Scott Walker's victory shows that the conservative formula wins, if Republicans stick to "normalcy."
James P. Pinkerton is a contributor to the Fox News Channel and a TAC contributing editor.
I have to agree with SteveM. There is really no difference between deficit-funded spending and deficit-funded tax cuts, although I suspect the latter probably have a higher multiplier, but we’ll never know since the neo-Keynesians write op-eds and dogmatic best sellers rather than proving their theory beyond pointing to the great depression. Yes, I mean you, Krugman.
Walker represents a kind of old-school Republicanism. One that I for one would whole-heartedly embrace were it to arise from the muck of the religious fundamentalism and Norquist-induced stupidity of what currently passes for the Republican Party. He really is a bold guy, and I have an immense amount of respect for him. Would I could say the same of Romney.
Which is not to say there is not another model. Sometimes you can accomplish through negotiation what appears to require confrontation. See Lincoln Chafee. Also somebody I would like to welcome back into the Republican fold.
I think I agree more with SteveM than with James Pinkerton.
“if Romney can focus on the core Main Street issues of taxing and spending — and not get diverted into domestic or foreign quagmires —”
I agree, only adding that there is little chance of it since tax and spending issues cannot be disentangled from “foreign quagmires”; they coalesce in the foreign wars, obsolescent alliances, welfare subsidies (chiefly to or for Israel) and other staggeringly expensive consequences of the current foreign policy botch-up.
I haven’t seen an exit poll on the Walker election, but I wouldn’t be surprised if his margin of victory were smaller than the number of Paulite Tea Partiers and non-interventionist independents. Romney take note.
“… leaving behind exotic foreign wars …”
As previous commenters have suggested, not if Romney’s elected. He’s all but promised to “bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran.”
It was a state election.
The normalcy angle will be a bit more believable if the national Republican Party ever stops proclaiming Wilsonian Foreign Policy and the concomitant Pentagon spending as its uniting tenets. To see that in the week’s events requires reading between the lines for invisible ink.
As it stands, it appears we’ll just be de-funding the civil services of the American states so as to better support social engineering in Central Asia. That takes a very strange definition of normal, I think.
You paleocons are no better than the loons currently in charge of the GOP. Yeah, strip those damn sanitation workers, teachers, prison guards, cops, and firefighters of their right to collective bargain because they’re such parasites. Have you no shame?
Pinkerton (any relation of Allan?) tries to paint a lofty picture of significance for the national stage and the long term. Unfortunately, this significance exists only in his own mind.
Examples:
Four years after Wisconsin gave its electoral votes to Harding/Coolidge, it gave them to its own home-grown original Progressive, Robert La Follette. (Don’t forget the Progressive movement originated in the Republican Party).
Only a year after electing Kasich governor in Ohio, the same electorate overturned the man’s anti-union legislation by a 2-1 margin.
Exit polls in Wisconsin not only correctly called Walker’s win, but also reported a majority of those same voters were favorable to President Obama.
Lesson: Each race is unique, and all politics is local, even if the unique local races generate a discernible national trend — for a year or two.
Scott Walker kept his job because the clueless, spineless, nearsighted Democratic Party, hypnotized by its own deadwood, ran against him the same uninspiring old politician who lost to him in 2010. The party leadership hasn’t a clue what voters are looking for. Voters settled for the devil they knew over the devil they knew far too long. Walker is still a fresh face, relatively speaking. Not for long, prayerfully.
I tend to agree with Siralys. Pinkerton seems to want to paint with too rosy a color with regards to Walker. Remember when it came to his changes on public sector bargaining he left the public safety unions out of the mix. Thus caving to a strong public sector union force, and pandering to the culture warrior crowd by vilifying school teachers.
Also, careful with the Harding references. His was afterall one of the most corrupt administrations. Especially in terms of the buying and selling of justice and gov. services.
Walker was lucky that the Wisconsin dems didn’t learn from California reps. Had they offered up a popular alternative, he might have lost. There wad a reason he won the first time, likely the same reason he won the rematch.
While Walker is taking his victory lap, left lying on infield are three GOP state Senators who went along with his proposals and were all recalled, wiping out a once 19-14 majority into an 17-16 minority and 18-15 when you factor in a non-ideological Republican state senator who doesn’t go along with their agenda.
Now, it’s very possible the GOP may get its majority back because, after all, they drew up the maps for the next election but the Dems don’t have a lot of vulnerable seats and I, living in Wisconsin, have a suspicion voters may keep the Senate in Dem hands as a check to have one-party control to the legislative-executive and even judicial branch as well. This would not be an unusual voting habit for them to do so.
What should be appreciated is the natural conservatism of many Wisconsinites who voted against the recall because they don’t like the idea of replacing elected officials willy-nilly. But that’s just it, there’s a big difference between the “natural” conservatism which we celebrate at TAC and Walker’s “ideological” version written for him by the Bradley Foundation and pounded in persons head by the Milwaukee radio talk-show hosts. Of that 40 percent Pinkerston cites, how much would you guess belongs to either one? I’d think you’d be surprised how many follow ideological conservatism, maybe 20 percent, same as the ideological Left. How would I come to this conclusion? Well, ask yourself who was the last ideological conservative to win the GOP nomination?
And oh by the way, 40 percent is still just that, 40 percent. That’s not a majority. Moderates may well be called non-ideologicals (or as some call them liberal light). How do I guess this? Well, tell me why a majority of Americans now support homosexual marriage?
Kill the unions but marry the homosexuals – My how different it was back in the “good old days” when the unions were strong an the idea of homosexual marriage would have been seen as subversive. Conservatism? We need to poll how many are Libertarians.
“Return to Normalcy”
That statement means almost nothing in today’s society. Back in 1920 it meant something, a return to a pre-war, pre-progressive experimentation period. Today what does this statement mean for Wisconsin and America? Nothing. Scott Walker really isn’t returning Wisconsin to an early period of peace and normalcy, heck if anything he’s the one doing the experimentation. Since Union dominance in Wisconsin for many decades was normal.
Wisconsin has always had a history of Progressive and conservative state politics. The LaFollettes, Proxmire, and Feingold on the left, and McCarthy, Kasten, Thompson, and now Walker on the Right. And considering the polls showing the President’s positive ratings among both Walker and Barrett voters, I don’t this proves a new Republican awakening in the Badger State.
“Meanwhile, if Romney can focus on the core Main Street issues of taxing and spending — and not get diverted into domestic or foreign quagmires — he will win this November.”
He already remains reliably super-hawkish on Foreign Policy issues, while remaining hopelessly vague on everything else. His candidacy reminds me more of the colorless Progressive-lite Charles Evans Hughes than it does Warren Harding. And if Barack Obama fits the Professorial Orator interventionist Progressive Anti-civil liberty President Wilson, then this election is more comparable with 1916 than 1920. With President Obama promising restraint while using hawkish rhetoric in regards to Iran and Syria, and Romney running to the right of the President, pushing for more “action.” This sounds nothing like Harding the man who pardoned WWI/Draft critic and Socialist Eugene V. Debs. A President Romney correcting any of the civil liberty erosion under this Administration, (or the preceding one), is highly unlikely. Likewise his past support for TARP and his opposition to cuts to the entitlement system seem to a status-quo administration rather than a return to anything.
Therefore I must ask what does the “Return to Normalcy” mean in modern America? Is it a return to the Bush Era? Well if that’s it than I hate to inform you we never really left. With the exception of the less bellicose rhetoric in foreign affairs the Obama era is effectively a continuation of the Bush Years. How about a return to the 90s? Well for that to happen a new booming industry is needed. Otherwise if you’re looking for the Clinton years, then once again we’re already there.
A Democratic President in Gridlock with a Republican Congress producing half-ass compromised policies representing the worst of both worlds. Nanny-statism, interventionism abroad, the only thing missing is a White House intern. There is No Return to Normalcy, because in modern day America….we’re already there.
Re: “Meanwhile, if Romney can focus on the core Main Street issues of taxing and spending — and not get diverted into domestic or foreign quagmires — he will win this November.”
Fat chance. Atrocious Obama wants to spend out the wazoo till he’s out of office because he’s fundamentally stupid and naive. While Romney wants to supply-side tax cut with insufficient budget offsets.
In the end, both Harvard trained Idiot-Savants would generate increased deficits of approximately the same magnitude.
Moreover, Romney has already promised diversions into new foreign quagmires with an increased bellicosity to go along with an increase of 100,000 troops. All debt funded of course.
Obama and Romney are two sides of the same sclerotic Power Elite coin. Whichever feckless Nitwit wins will eventually go down as the 21st Century Herbert Hoover.