Three months ago, George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer in Sanford, Fla., shot and killed Trayvon Martin.
Handcuffed, taken in and interrogated, Zimmerman told police Trayvon had been acting suspiciously that dark and rainy night, that he had followed Trayvon, been knocked down and battered on the ground, and, fearing for his life, pulled a concealed handgun and shot him.
Sanford police and prosecutors concluded that Zimmerman acted in self-defense and had not committed a provable felony. They let him go.
A racial firestorm followed. “Blacks are under attack,” railed Jesse Jackson. “Killing us is big business.” Arriving in Sanford, the reverend dialed it up. Trayvon was “shot down in cold blood by a vigilante … murdered and martyred.”
Rep. Maxine Waters’ charge of “hate crime” was echoed by radio talker Joe Madison. Rep. Hank Johnson said Trayvon had been “executed.” The Grio compared his killing to the lynching of Emmett Till in Mississippi in 1955.
The New Black Panther Party put Zimmerman’s face on a “Wanted Dead or Alive” poster, called for 5,000 black men to run him down and said Trayvon had been “murdered in cold blood.”
Spike Lee twittered Zimmerman’s home address.
Zimmerman and his family have been in hiding for months in fear for their lives after the death threats.
President Obama expressed his empathy with the parents.
“If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon. And I think (the parents) are right to expect that all of us as Americans are gonna take this with the seriousness it deserves and that we’re going to get to the bottom of exactly what happened.”
Obama said not a word to cool the lynch-mob atmosphere created by some of his major allies in a nation where he is the chief law enforcement officer. And so the campaign to convict Zimmerman of racist murder in the public mind, before he ever got to trial, proceeded on.
Rep. Jan Schakowsky called Trayvon’s killing a “modern-day lynching.” CNN claimed to have picked up the phrase “(bleeping) coons” on the tape of Zimmerman’s call to police, but had to retract when an enhanced version of the tape revealed no such slur.
Three times NBC used a version of Zimmerman’s call to the police edited to make it appear he racially profiled Trayvon.
The actual version:
Zimmerman: “This guy looks like he’s up to no good, or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining, and he’s just walking around, looking about.”
Dispatcher: “OK, and this guy, is he white, black or Hispanic?”
Zimmerman: “He looks black.”
The transcript was spliced to have Zimmerman say: “This guy looks like he’s up to no good. He looks black.”
CNN media critic Howard Kurtz called it “blatant distortion.”
Caught and called out, three NBC employees were cashiered.
With this wind at her back, Florida State Attorney Angela Corey charged Zimmerman with second-degree murder. Translation: Zimmerman murdered Trayvon in a “depraved” state of mind.
If convicted, he could get life.
Last week came a more ominous report. Federal investigators are looking into hate crime charges that could bring the death penalty. The feds would have to prove Zimmerman stalked and murdered Trayvon because he was black.
Yet, last week also, evidence from the investigation spilled out into the national media and seemed to contradict and swamp the prosecution’s case.
A medical report the day after the shooting revealed that Zimmerman had suffered a broken nose, two black eyes and lacerations on the back of his head. Photographs from the night of the shooting confirmed it.
A police report that same night said Zimmerman’s sweatshirt had “grass stains and was wet on the back,” consistent with his being flat on his back.
The lead investigator on the scene, Officer Christopher Serino, wrote that Zimmerman could be heard “yelling for help as he was being battered by Trayvon Martin.” One witness said he heard 14 separate cries for help. Trayvon’s father initially told police the cries were not those of his son, then recanted.
One responder at the scene said he saw wounds on the knuckles of one of Trayvon’s hands, suggesting he had connected with a punch. The coroner found both the knuckle wounds and traces of the drug found in marijuana in Trayvon’s blood and urine.
Trayvon’s hoodie had powder stains indicating he was shot in the chest from 1 to 18 inches away, consistent again with what Zimmerman said.
Another eyewitness said the guy in the hoodie was on top beating the guy on the bottom “MMA style” — mixed martial arts style.
With this evidence, how can a jury convict Zimmerman of murder?
Yet the public mind has been so poisoned that an acquittal of George Zimmerman could ignite a reaction similar to that, 20 years ago, when the Simi Valley jury acquitted the LAPD cops in the Rodney King beating case.
Should that happen, those who fanned the flames, and those who did nothing to douse them, should themselves go on trial in the public arena.
Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025? Copyright 2012 Creators.com
WalterLewkowski 
VieuxCarre 
JonF311 
Rossbach 
Colin Vollebergh 
TestaDura 
Joseph Shikhman 
Pat,
The way I see it Zimmerman has three basic problems.
1. He pursued Martin, against law enforcement advice, and as a result initiated the confrontation. This could make him appear to be the aggressor, which would seriously undermine a self-defense claim. This is why the law makers who crafted the Stand your ground have said that it wouldn’t apply to Zimmerman in the first place. It is also why the state prosecutor is pursing 2nd degree murder charges.
2. He has apparently told several different versions of the events. The first being that he was minding his own business when he was suddenly attacked. The third being the version under oath at the initial prelim. hearing. This inability to tell the story correctly from the beginning will come back to haunt him at trail.
3. He will have to take the stand, which means he will be subject to cross-examination. He will have to account for his variations of story, he will have to justify why he followed the kid, and will likely be taken to task for everything that has been said since that night.
And yes the defense will attempt to put the victim on trial, that is what you have to do in a self-defense case, but as a result Martin mother will take the stand and cry, as will his pother relatives and girl friend. It will all be very emotional and murky. I do not envy that jury at all.
There is still a good chance that he will be found not guilty, or his own complicity in the events of that night will catch up with him and he will be found guilty of some lesser crime.
Either way, he took a human life and there are consequences for that. I am surprised that the supposed right to life crowd has such a hard time with that concept.