fbpx
Politics Foreign Affairs Culture Fellows Program

Why the UK ‘Office’ is better than US version

In explaining the difference between American and British humor, Ricky Gervais inadvertently explains to me why I loved the UK version of “The Office,” but find the American version bland to the point of unwatchability: I guess the biggest difference between the U.S. version and the U.K. version of The Office reflected this. We had to make […]

In explaining the difference between American and British humor, Ricky Gervais inadvertently explains to me why I loved the UK version of “The Office,” but find the American version bland to the point of unwatchability:

I guess the biggest difference between the U.S. version and the U.K. version of The Office reflected this. We had to make Michael Scott a slightly nicer guy, with a rosier outlook to life. He could still be childish, and insecure, and even a bore, but he couldn’t be too mean. The irony is of course that I think David Brent’s dark descension and eventual redemption made him all the more compelling. But I think that’s a lot more palatable in Britain for the reasons already stated. Brits almost expect doom and gloom so to start off that way but then have a happy ending is an unexpected joy. Network America has to give people a reason to like you not just a reason to watch you. In Britain we stop watching things like Big Brother when the villain is evicted. We don’t want to watch a bunch of idiots having a good time. We want them to be as miserable as us. America rewards up front, on-your-sleeve niceness. A perceived wicked streak is somewhat frowned upon.

Advertisement

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Subscribe for as little as $5/mo to start commenting on Rod’s blog.

Join Now