fbpx
Politics Foreign Affairs Culture Fellows Program

The Apologists

For 50 minutes, Obama sat mute, as a Marxist thug from Nicaragua delivered his diatribe, charging America with a century of terrorist aggression in Central America. After Daniel Ortega finished spitting in our face, accusing us of inhumanity toward Fidel Castro’s Cuba, Obama was asked his thoughts. “I thought it was 50 minutes long. That’s […]

For 50 minutes, Obama sat mute, as a Marxist thug from Nicaragua delivered his diatribe, charging America with a century of terrorist aggression in Central America.

After Daniel Ortega finished spitting in our face, accusing us of inhumanity toward Fidel Castro’s Cuba, Obama was asked his thoughts.

“I thought it was 50 minutes long. That’s what I thought.”

Hillary Clinton was asked to comment: “I thought the cultural performance was fascinating,” she cooed.

Pressed again on Ortega’s vitriol, Hillary replied: “To have those first-class Caribbean entertainers all on one stage and to see how much was done in such a small amount of space. I was overwhelmed.”

Thus the nation that won the Cold War, contained the cancer of Castroism in Cuba, liberated Grenada, blocked communist takeovers of Guatemala and the Dominican Republic, and poured scores of billions in aid into this region was left undefended by its own leaders at the Summit of the Americas.

Nor was this the only unanswered insult. Hugo Chavez, who has called Obama an “ignoramus” and Bush “El Diablo,” walked over to a seated U.S. president and handed him the anti-American tract Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent.

The book blames Latin America’s failures on white Europeans.

It opens, “Renaissance Europeans ventured across the oceans and buried their teeth in the throats of the Indian civilizations.”

Civilizations? Before Pizarro and Cortez, the Inca and Aztec empires these conquistadors overthrew were into human sacrifice.

Evo Morales, the Aymaran president of Bolivia, who is using the race card against Bolivians of European descent, implied a U.S. role in an assassination plot against him.

Argentina’s Cristina Kirchner, who allegedly received black-bag money from Chavez, ripped into America for its role in the 1980s. Under Reagan, America aided Britain in the Falklands War, after the Argentine junta invaded the islands, and assisted the Contras in their war of national liberation to oust Ortega’s Sandinistas.

Again, Obama offered no defense of his country.

President Lula da Silva of Brazil, who blames the world financial crisis on “white, blue-eyed bankers,” told Obama that any future Summit of the Americas without the Castro brothers was unacceptable.

Perhaps Obama believes in turn-the-other-cheek diplomacy, though it is hard to find much success in history for such a policy. Perhaps pacifism is in his DNA. Perhaps he shares the indictment of America that is part of the repertoire of every Latin demagogue.

Whatever his motive, in Trinidad, there were not two sides to the story. There were the trashers of America on the Latino left and a U.S. president who wailed plaintively, “I’m thankful that President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was 3 months old.”

But, the Bay of Pigs, had it succeeded, would have given Cubans 50 years of freedom instead of the brutal dictatorship they have had to endure. And it took place four months before Barack was born.

Obama’s silence — signifying, as it does, assent — in the face of attacks on his country is of a piece with the “contrition tour” of his secretary of state.

“Clinton Scores Points by Admitting Past U.S. Errors,” was the headline over Saturday’s New York Times story by Mark Landler:

“It has become a recurring theme of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s early travels as the chief diplomat of the United States: She says that American policy on a given issue has failed, and her foreign listeners fall all over themselves in gratitude.

“On Friday, Mrs. Clinton said … that the uncompromising policy of the Bush administration toward Cuba had not worked. …

“The contrition tour goes beyond Latin America. In China, Mrs. Clinton told audiences that the United States must accept its responsibility as a leading emitter of greenhouse gases. In Indonesia, she said the American-backed policy of sanctions against Myanmar had not been effective. And in the Middle East, she pointed out that ostracizing the Iranian government had not persuaded it to give up its nuclear weapons ambitions.”

Sandler wrote that Hillary brought to mind Bill Clinton:

“On a single trip to Africa in 1998 … Bill Clinton apologized for American participation in slavery; American support of brutal African dictators; American ‘neglect and ignorance’ of Africa; American failure to intervene sooner in the Rwandan genocide of 1994; American ‘complicity’ in apartheid … .”

Yet, as C.S. Lewis reminds us in “God in the Dock,” “The first and fatal charm of national repentance is … the encouragement it gives us to turn from the bitter task of repenting our own sins to the congenial one of bewailing — but, first, of denouncing — the conduct of others.”

Bewailing the policies of Bush as failures and standing mute in the face of attacks on his country and predecessors may come back to bite Obama.

For when Jimmy Carter assumed a posture of moral superiority over LBJ and Richard Nixon, by declaring, “We have gotten over our inordinate fear of communism,” it came back to bite him, good and hard.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.

Advertisement

Comments

Become a Member today for a growing stake in the conservative movement.
Join here!
Join here

The Apologists

After his fifth apology, on Black Educational Television, and his promise to honor Martin Luther King Day and support affirmative action forever, Trent Lott packed it in. That was the signal for the pogrom. From the Clintons to the Black Caucus, the Left howled that the GOP must now own up to its sins and […]

After his fifth apology, on Black Educational Television, and his promise to honor Martin Luther King Day and support affirmative action forever, Trent Lott packed it in. That was the signal for the pogrom.

From the Clintons to the Black Caucus, the Left howled that the GOP must now own up to its sins and exorcise the demon of racism that has inhabited the party soul since Nixon.

From all sides, evidence was thrown in Republican faces. Had not Reagan used the code word “states rights” in beginning his 1980 campaign in Philadelphia, Miss., the town where civil rights workers Schwerner, Cheney, and Goodman were martyred in 1964?

Had not Jesse Helms won on a racist ad showing a pair of white hands crumbling a rejection letter for a job lost because of affirmative action? Had not Bush I won the White House with his Willie Horton ad? Had not Pete Wilson won re-election as governor of California running on that “anti-immigrant” Proposition 187? Yet, rather than defend their past, Republicans reeled and groveled: “It wasn’t us!” “We’re not like that!” “We’re modern Republicans!”

The great failing of conservatives, said Whittaker Chambers, is that they do not retrieve their wounded. But the Trent Affair reveals a greater failure. Modern conservatives are a deracinated lot, unrooted in history, unwilling to defend their kinfolk or forebears. Confronted with a charge of “racism” or “bigotry,” their natural reaction is to imitate the wildebeest of the Serengeti and light out for the tall grass.

With neoconservatives, this is understandable. After all, they are transients; they never belonged to the tribe. When the great battles of the 20th century were fought, they or their fathers were AWOL or on the other side. From the fight to kill Wilson’s surrendering of sovereignty in the Treaty of Versailles, to America First in the early 1940s, to the postwar fights over Soviet subversion, to the Goldwater movement, Nixon, Agnew, and Vietnam, they were with Trotsky, Truman, and LBJ.

Thus, as the Left rewrites the history of the 20th century to make itself heroic and the Right the racist villains, neocons declare neutrality. As for Republicans, many take the attitude epitomized by old Henry Ford: “History is bunk.” And who cares about yesterday?

But as Trent Lott learned, ignorance has consequences. People who never heard of the 1948 Dixiecrats before December were soon howling for Lott’s head. Uneducated to think, the new generation has been conditioned to respond with precise political correctness.

But rather than apologize for its past, the Right should be demanding apologies. In World War II, liberal icon FDR appeased Stalin at Tehran and Yalta in a fashion so supine as to make Neville Chamberlain at Munich looked like Stonewall Jackson at First Manassas. When his bumbling heir, Harry Truman, left office, all the nations for which Britain and America had gone to war—Czechoslovakia, Poland, China—were in the iron grip of a barbaric, anti-Christian tyranny worse than any threat Hitler had ever posed, Americans were dying by the thousands in Truman’s “no-win war” in Korea, and the U.S. government had been honeycombed with spies and traitors to such an extent—as the Venona transcripts now prove—that Joe McCarthy had badly understated his case.

Liberals today wail and whine about the “anti-Communist hysteria” and “McCarthyism” of the era, but the American people loved the pounding that Nixon, Mundt, Jenner, and “Tailgunner Joe” gave Truman, Acheson, and Marshall, and Americans repudiated the liberal squish Adlai in two huge Eisenhower landslides without a single regret.

As for LBJ’s Great Society, it gave us deficits, crime waves, race riots in 100 cities, campus rampages by over-privileged brats, and another “no-win war’ into which a failing, incompetent liberal establishment had plunged the United States. Between 1968 and 1988, Nixon, Agnew, and Reagan hammered the Party of Humphrey, McGovern, Mondale, and Dukakis so relentlessly that liberals now all call themselves “progressives.”

Why is the GOP ashamed of this record of victory? There was nothing wrong with the tactics that gave the party those 49-state landslides. Simply because states rights were once used to sustain segregation does not invalidate that founding principle of the Republic.

Jesse Helms was right to spotlight a victim of the racist policy of reverse discrimination, as was Bush to highlight the consequences of the ACLU idiocy of Dukakis in handing out weekend furloughs to crazed killers like Willie Horton. When conservatives start apologizing for the campaigns that gave them their greatest victories, they become, as in 1992 and 1996, what Sam Francis aptly calls them: “Beautiful Losers.”

Advertisement

Comments

Become a Member today for a growing stake in the conservative movement.
Join here!
Join here