Comments on: Neoconned No More

By: Why Rush Won't Talk About Rand Paul

Why Rush Won't Talk About Rand Paul — Thu, 20 May 2010 03:38:24 +0000

[...] [...]

By: Who are the dangerous conspiracy theorists? – Dark Politricks

Who are the dangerous conspiracy theorists? – Dark Politricks — Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:38:00 +0000

[...] the ones feverishly hawked by the likes of Sarah Palin, Bill O’Reilly, Newt Gingrich, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh that call for the American military to begin attacking Iran? The aforementioned talking heads of [...]

By: Who are the dangerous conspiracy theorists? | NW0.eu

Who are the dangerous conspiracy theorists? | NW0.eu — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:42:20 +0000

By: Who are the dangerous conspiracy theorists? | We Are Change Utah

Who are the dangerous conspiracy theorists? | We Are Change Utah — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:36:21 +0000

By: Who are the dangerous conspiracy theorists? | we must know

Who are the dangerous conspiracy theorists? | we must know — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:12:52 +0000

By: Who are the dangerous conspiracy theorists? | Tenth Amendment Center Blog

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:08:27 +0000

By: BSDN

BSDN — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:18:22 +0000

What happened was the old liberals got split at the New Deal and the Dims got the no foreign wars part and the Repuglicans got the no welfare at home part and each was then grafted to its conservative(?) counterpart. Endless internecine recriminations and sandbox slug fests have resulted.

Those who consequently say no to the big govt. warfare/welfare syndrome are then castigated as being either heartless or pro terrorists, if not both, by the two respective branches of the Big Govt. Party. Go figure.
That’s how twisted up the American body politic has become.
The TParty movement has a chance to break the impasse, but not if Eva Palin becomes its figurehead. Rather the first teaparty was held by the RPaul campaign. It needs to get back to those kind of roots.

By: Hugh

Hugh — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:43:40 +0000

While Mr Heath correctly defines Bush as a ‘conservative’ merely by mindset and instinct, not by study and reflection, qualities scorned by Bush, it was disappointing- and revealing- that he began that description by defining Bush as a mainstream conservative. A mainstream conservative who DOUBLED the size of the federal Department of Education in his first term !!

This is an accomplishment that no one named Gore or Clinton could have hoped to achieve, for fear of being eaten alive by ———conservatives; who just before George II ran for president in y2k had decided to completely shut down the ed dept.

So what you are seeing is a nation of stumbling, raging misfits who are not capable of a moment of reasonably tranquil reflection of cause and effect, but rather yammer on in successions of hackneyed cliches, bromides and slogans ; ‘take him out”, “dead or alive”, “Bring ‘em on” (“Brang ‘em on”), “cut ‘n run”, “stay the course”, “Blame America first”, “step up”, that will always appeal to just enough slack-jawed, glassy-eyed, drooling boobs whose emptiness, confusion and hatreds can easily be directed towards the latest sources of made-up fear. If it weren’t Moslems then it’d be directed at French (it is) – But why not the Brits? And if it weren’t them forenjers, it’d be — them Yankees , or them Southerners, or them Californians.

He describes Sara well (Sarah?) . A footnote in history. Look how she rants aimlessly, invoking random street slang. Please do not let her leave the stage just yet. How wonderful it is to see the intelligentsia of the Republican Wing of BIG rush to her defense, this aimless individual, raised up by Republicans in ’08 as a desperate ploy; an on-side kick in the stupid bowl of politics – without the result. Note how so many of accomplshment ‘step up’ to defend each of her latest examples of descent into confusion. May they keep at it , I pray, for just a couple years more as she descends a throne of delirium.

Look, considering the taxes gouged from us , we may as well get our grins along the way.

Hah! Bring it on.

Make that Brang it on.

How I hope the Republican Wing of Big Intrusive Government runs her again in ’12

By: Diderot

Diderot — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:15:55 +0000

Why in the name of God, at this juncture in history, would any serious political discussion contain the names Beck, Hannity, and Limbaugh. For that matter, Sarah Palin. You people are killing me. Is it not yet obvious, to paraphrase Diderot, that America will never be free until the last Republican is strangled with the entrails of the last Democrat? Metaphorically, of course!

By: Diderot

Diderot — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:49:51 +0000

Why in the name of God, at this juncture in history, would any serious political discussion contain the words Beck, Hannity, and Limbaugh. For that matter, Sarah Palin. You people are killing me. Is it not yet obvious, to paraphrase Diderot, that America will never be free until the last Republican is strangled with the entrails of the last Democrat?