<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biden to Stephanopoulos: NOW We’re in Favor of Non-Interference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/schwenkler/2009/07/05/biden-to-stephanopoulos-now-were-in-favor-of-non-interference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/schwenkler/2009/07/05/biden-to-stephanopoulos-now-were-in-favor-of-non-interference/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=biden-to-stephanopoulos-now-were-in-favor-of-non-interference</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 07:05:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Schwenkler</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/schwenkler/2009/07/05/biden-to-stephanopoulos-now-were-in-favor-of-non-interference/comment-page-1/#comment-4904</link>
		<dc:creator>John Schwenkler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/schwenkler/2009/07/05/biden-to-stephanopoulos-now-were-in-favor-of-non-interference/#comment-4904</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;When doing nothing is, indeed, doing something, I reckon.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Especially when it&#039;s our dollars - not to mention weapons - that would make an attack possible. Simply incredible.

&lt;blockquote&gt;You don’t mean to tell me that the current administration could be at least as hawkish and interventionist as its predecessor, do you?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, never! How could you suggest such a thing?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When doing nothing is, indeed, doing something, I reckon.</p></blockquote>
<p>Especially when it&#8217;s our dollars &#8211; not to mention weapons &#8211; that would make an attack possible. Simply incredible.</p>
<blockquote><p>You don’t mean to tell me that the current administration could be at least as hawkish and interventionist as its predecessor, do you?</p></blockquote>
<p>No, never! How could you suggest such a thing?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan P. Origer</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/schwenkler/2009/07/05/biden-to-stephanopoulos-now-were-in-favor-of-non-interference/comment-page-1/#comment-4903</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan P. Origer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/schwenkler/2009/07/05/biden-to-stephanopoulos-now-were-in-favor-of-non-interference/#comment-4903</guid>
		<description>When doing nothing is, indeed, doing something, I reckon. Something very, very bad and stupid. 

If I recall, erstwhile commander-in-chief GWB warned Israel against an attack on Iran. You don&#039;t mean to tell me that the current administration could be at least as hawkish and interventionist as its predecessor, do you?

Re: Honduras, perhaps the Obama Administration is returning to the Monroe Doctrine, with a special exception for Afghanistan? 

Re: Update, at least Israel is sort of getting along with another Muslim nation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When doing nothing is, indeed, doing something, I reckon. Something very, very bad and stupid. </p>
<p>If I recall, erstwhile commander-in-chief GWB warned Israel against an attack on Iran. You don&#8217;t mean to tell me that the current administration could be at least as hawkish and interventionist as its predecessor, do you?</p>
<p>Re: Honduras, perhaps the Obama Administration is returning to the Monroe Doctrine, with a special exception for Afghanistan? </p>
<p>Re: Update, at least Israel is sort of getting along with another Muslim nation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

