<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Julie Gunlock for Real?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-julie-gunlock-for-real</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 07:05:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Tinley</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/comment-page-1/#comment-4238</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Tinley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/#comment-4238</guid>
		<description>Having volunteered at numerous soup kitchens, the mission of a soup kitchen is much deeper than just providing a &quot;good meal;&quot; soup kitchens also strive to provide people who face countless indignities everyday with some dignity and a real sense that there is someone who cares about them and wants them to succeed.  I detest these types of articles that make the assumption just because someone is homeless they should be happy to get any care from other at all and don&#039;t deserve or want the same things everyone else wants.  

Also, not only is there a lack of research, there is a willful miss-reading of the quote from the staffer at Miriam&#039;s Kitchen. The staffer is using a simile; he or she is not saying they actually serve $30 meals, but that strive to provide quality service to their patrons. If the author of the article had ever served at a soup kitchen, she would know that soups kitchens encourage their patrons to become self-reliant, a valued conservative trait, by making the small gestures that help restore an individuals self worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having volunteered at numerous soup kitchens, the mission of a soup kitchen is much deeper than just providing a &#8220;good meal;&#8221; soup kitchens also strive to provide people who face countless indignities everyday with some dignity and a real sense that there is someone who cares about them and wants them to succeed.  I detest these types of articles that make the assumption just because someone is homeless they should be happy to get any care from other at all and don&#8217;t deserve or want the same things everyone else wants.  </p>
<p>Also, not only is there a lack of research, there is a willful miss-reading of the quote from the staffer at Miriam&#8217;s Kitchen. The staffer is using a simile; he or she is not saying they actually serve $30 meals, but that strive to provide quality service to their patrons. If the author of the article had ever served at a soup kitchen, she would know that soups kitchens encourage their patrons to become self-reliant, a valued conservative trait, by making the small gestures that help restore an individuals self worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/comment-page-1/#comment-4228</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/#comment-4228</guid>
		<description>Bwahahahaha! No, I missed that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bwahahahaha! No, I missed that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Schwenkler</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/comment-page-1/#comment-4227</link>
		<dc:creator>John Schwenkler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 05:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/#comment-4227</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah, the problem really is the tissue-thin “research.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Speaking of which, did you read that the food kitchen she highlights isn&#039;t even receiving money from the federal government?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yeah, the problem really is the tissue-thin “research.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Speaking of which, did you read that the food kitchen she highlights isn&#8217;t even receiving money from the federal government?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/comment-page-1/#comment-4226</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 03:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/#comment-4226</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the problem really is the tissue-thin &quot;research.&quot; She does acknowledge that these places should try to serve healthy food, but she goes on to discover elitism everywhere when the only evidence is that rather ambiguous quote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the problem really is the tissue-thin &#8220;research.&#8221; She does acknowledge that these places should try to serve healthy food, but she goes on to discover elitism everywhere when the only evidence is that rather ambiguous quote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Schwenkler</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/comment-page-1/#comment-4225</link>
		<dc:creator>John Schwenkler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 01:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/#comment-4225</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s a fair point, Ken - unless the people they&#039;re serving food to don&#039;t want day-old donuts anyway (which wouldn&#039;t be unreasonable!), tossing them in the trash seems foolish. But as you say, it&#039;s up to Gunlock to actually do the research here; and for heaven&#039;s sake, the back cover of my Alice Waters cookbook has &quot;Remember that food is precious&quot; among the handful of (elitist and condescending, no doubt) guidelines, so it&#039;s not as if these are matters that foodies are insensitive to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s a fair point, Ken &#8211; unless the people they&#8217;re serving food to don&#8217;t want day-old donuts anyway (which wouldn&#8217;t be unreasonable!), tossing them in the trash seems foolish. But as you say, it&#8217;s up to Gunlock to actually do the research here; and for heaven&#8217;s sake, the back cover of my Alice Waters cookbook has &#8220;Remember that food is precious&#8221; among the handful of (elitist and condescending, no doubt) guidelines, so it&#8217;s not as if these are matters that foodies are insensitive to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenB</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/comment-page-1/#comment-4224</link>
		<dc:creator>kenB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 01:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/#comment-4224</guid>
		<description>FWIW, I think the quote that she was reacting to was rather unfortunate -- the juxtaposition of throwing away donated food and aiming for the equivalent of $30 meals could easily be taken as food snobbery, even though the broader context (not to mention other articles about the establishment, had she bothered to research) shows that they&#039;re aiming for healthy, not chichi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, I think the quote that she was reacting to was rather unfortunate &#8212; the juxtaposition of throwing away donated food and aiming for the equivalent of $30 meals could easily be taken as food snobbery, even though the broader context (not to mention other articles about the establishment, had she bothered to research) shows that they&#8217;re aiming for healthy, not chichi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Is For Argula, That&#8217;s Good Enough For Me! &#171; Around The Sphere</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/comment-page-1/#comment-4223</link>
		<dc:creator>A Is For Argula, That&#8217;s Good Enough For Me! &#171; Around The Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/schwenkler/2009/05/18/is-julie-gunlock-for-real/#comment-4223</guid>
		<description>[...] John Schwenkler: Oh, and guess what? The title of Gunlock’s piece is an arugula joke! Which is, like, so funny! And we can all agree, I take it, that real Americans only serve iceberg lettuce to the starving and destitute … [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Schwenkler: Oh, and guess what? The title of Gunlock’s piece is an arugula joke! Which is, like, so funny! And we can all agree, I take it, that real Americans only serve iceberg lettuce to the starving and destitute … [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

