Hey! That’s my adviser!
The philosopher just quoted on the Dish, I mean. Here’s another choice excerpt:
… the view that the self and consciousness can be explained in terms of the brain, that the real us is found inside our skulls, isn’t just misleading and wrong, it’s ugly. In that view, each of us is trapped in the caverns of his own skull and the world is just a sort of shared figment. Everything is made interior, private, rational and computational. That may not pose a practical danger, but it presents a kind of spiritual danger.
In that view, each of us is an island of intellect, alone. When you think of us as just interior neurological mechanisms, you see us as alienated from the world around us. The world shows up for us as bits of information that we decipher, like linguistic relics of an ancient culture that we have to interpret. Like when Mr. Spock says, “What is this strange kissing custom?” The danger is alienation, plain and simple. We’re strangers in a strange land.
I find this a very sad and ugly picture of our circumstance. Now contrast that view with a sense of ourselves as engaged in the flow, responsive to the things going on around us, part of the world. It’s a very different picture.
I don’t always agree with Alva’s views in their entirety, but this bit in particular is right on the mark. The whole thing is worth reading.
Filed under: philosophy, science/tech



I wonder why that’s sad and ugly to him.
Was that meant as a sincere question? I suppose I could answer, but much of what I’d say is contained in what I already quoted …