Comments on: One Year On

By: David Lindsay

David Lindsay — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:50:41 +0000

Certainly not! It is the capitalist system that depends on unrestricted migration. Hence the GOP’s amnesty enthusiasm, of course.

By: eep

eep — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:20:34 +0000

I understand the part about supporting Islam in Iraq and in Kosovo but what is this about Neocons, Western Europe, and immigration? Is Neocon being used as a general term for social democrat?

By: Mad Doc MacRae

Mad Doc MacRae — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:53:52 +0000

I think I understand half of this…

By: Adam R

Adam R — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:52:37 +0000

My only problem with Lindsay’s piece is its incoherence!

By: Nathan P. Origer

Nathan P. Origer — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 06:53:02 +0000

Thanks, Thomas. The way I look at it, what good does it to be an insane reactionary radical if no one gets to disagree?

By: Thomas O. Meehan

Thomas O. Meehan — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:17:15 +0000

Nathan, bravo! Your position regarding censorship is much appreciated and stands in contrast to Takimag’s retreat in the face of a few Nazi trolls.

By: Jeremiah Whitmoore

Jeremiah Whitmoore — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:52:26 +0000

Patrick is an erudite conservative. It’s easily detectable by his “Babe of the Day” feature at his thoughtful website.

By: Nathan P. Origer

Nathan P. Origer — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:19:24 +0000

You know, Patrick, I understand that you're not in agreement with David's tone, but it's not impossible to use the term "neocon" without casting a net that catches all Jews. I can't speak for David's views, but there is nothing in this piece that suggests that he's an "anti-Semite". "Neoconservative" is very widely accepted term used to describe purportedly right-wing adherents of interventionist doctrine. You're free to say and to think what you wish, and we're never going to censor you (unless you use intolerably foul language, which I simply would redact, though I can speak for no one else), but I cannot help but thinking that the bitterness that you've directed toward Post Right and TAC more broadly, both here and at your own place, is more a result of your not having been asked to contribute to this Weblog — something about which you publicly whined here at Post Right — than about any real disagreement. Sincere, reasoned dissent is fine, and even cherished, but self-pitying crybabyism is just sad.

By: Nathan P. Origer

Nathan P. Origer — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:11:40 +0000

Patrick, we don’t censor here. I approve anything that comes my way.

By: Patrick

Patrick — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 22:35:56 +0000

I bet you ain’t got the ball to approve that comment either.

Idiot Anti-Semite. Go to hell with the rest of the Hatemonger and their Nazi Heros!