<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Response to Matt Barganier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/07/14/a-response-to-matt-barganier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/07/14/a-response-to-matt-barganier/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-response-to-matt-barganier</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:49:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lennon Said &#8220;Sell It Like People Sell Soap Or Soft Drinks&#8221; &#171; Around The Sphere</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/07/14/a-response-to-matt-barganier/comment-page-1/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lennon Said &#8220;Sell It Like People Sell Soap Or Soft Drinks&#8221; &#171; Around The Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/postright/?p=575#comment-523</guid>
		<description>[...] Hawley responds: Having also been “born into” this audience, I am less convinced that a good portion of the Ditto-heads cannot be convinced by anti-war arguments. I just think they must be framed correctly. There may be a “Reasonable Right,” as Barganier says, but it will never be a major force if we do not at least make some inroads into the Limbaugh-listening community. Perhaps I’m mistaken that many Fox News fans can be brought around. Unfortunately, if I am  there will never again be a politically-significant anti-war Right; the “Reasonable Right” will forever be drowned out by the millions of talk-radio fans united in their belligerence. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hawley responds: Having also been “born into” this audience, I am less convinced that a good portion of the Ditto-heads cannot be convinced by anti-war arguments. I just think they must be framed correctly. There may be a “Reasonable Right,” as Barganier says, but it will never be a major force if we do not at least make some inroads into the Limbaugh-listening community. Perhaps I’m mistaken that many Fox News fans can be brought around. Unfortunately, if I am  there will never again be a politically-significant anti-war Right; the “Reasonable Right” will forever be drowned out by the millions of talk-radio fans united in their belligerence. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike43</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/07/14/a-response-to-matt-barganier/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike43</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/postright/?p=575#comment-499</guid>
		<description>We could also try to convince them through the money issue. I&#039;m sure some of them understand that soaring defecits, trillion dollar debt, and our dependecy on foreign capital don&#039;t make for a strong national defense. We just have to connect that with billion dollar embassies that we can&#039;t afford in Afganistan, and Pakistan, and the costs of runnng 700 bases worldwide. If that doesn&#039;t work.....well there&#039;s always the liberals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We could also try to convince them through the money issue. I&#8217;m sure some of them understand that soaring defecits, trillion dollar debt, and our dependecy on foreign capital don&#8217;t make for a strong national defense. We just have to connect that with billion dollar embassies that we can&#8217;t afford in Afganistan, and Pakistan, and the costs of runnng 700 bases worldwide. If that doesn&#8217;t work&#8230;..well there&#8217;s always the liberals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Barganier</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/07/14/a-response-to-matt-barganier/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Barganier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/postright/?p=575#comment-493</guid>
		<description>You make some good points. But I&#039;d like to ask those who take the &quot;ungrateful welfare queens&quot; approach to at least start with &lt;a href=&quot;http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/06/09/anti-americanism-in-israel/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;some people the term actually fits&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some good points. But I&#8217;d like to ask those who take the &#8220;ungrateful welfare queens&#8221; approach to at least start with <a href="http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/06/09/anti-americanism-in-israel/" rel="nofollow">some people the term actually fits</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

