<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Road to Serfdom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/06/30/the-road-to-serfdom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/06/30/the-road-to-serfdom/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-road-to-serfdom</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:49:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan P. Origer</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/06/30/the-road-to-serfdom/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan P. Origer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/postright/?p=440#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Tripp, I&#039;m referring to the Kool-Aid the compels you to think that a war between an antagonistic Israel and an Iran that would be incredibly stupid to start such a war could possibly be our business. 

Israel&#039;s concerns are Isarel&#039;s; ours are ours. They sometimes overlap, but with Bibi in control there, we should be wary of getting in any deeper than we are. I don&#039;t want to be around when that neurotic s.o.b. pisses of Mahmoud or whoever ends up pretending to run that place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tripp, I&#8217;m referring to the Kool-Aid the compels you to think that a war between an antagonistic Israel and an Iran that would be incredibly stupid to start such a war could possibly be our business. </p>
<p>Israel&#8217;s concerns are Isarel&#8217;s; ours are ours. They sometimes overlap, but with Bibi in control there, we should be wary of getting in any deeper than we are. I don&#8217;t want to be around when that neurotic s.o.b. pisses of Mahmoud or whoever ends up pretending to run that place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tripp DeMoss</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/06/30/the-road-to-serfdom/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Tripp DeMoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/postright/?p=440#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Dude, what kool aid are you talking about? If I were trying to propose learned discourse on the theories of international relations on other conservative websites it would turn into some sort of circle jerk about the Bush doctrine. My advocacy of a partially interventionist foreign policy in areas relating directly to the national interest doesn&#039;t make me a Sean Hannity lackey. That&#039;s rather dismissive and ignorant, intellectually speaking. I read and get great ideas from across the spectrum of conservatism and libertarianism, and just because I might find some parts of the justifications for our current actions overseas logical and desireable doesn&#039;t make me some sort of bloodthirsty 21st century Godfrey de Bouillon &quot;neo-con&quot; crusader type. Sure, I&#039;m not a realist, per se, but I&#039;m not some reformed ex-communist hawk either. The issues of foreign relations pertaining to the rabid bellicosity of certain places in the Middle East are a bit too poignant for me to say &quot;You know what?Let&#039;s just stay out of it-we don&#039;t want to piss people off,right?&quot;. I don&#039;t live in political la la land and honestly think foreign entanglements won&#039;t come to us, especially considering large amounts of people with relatively good military technology who are only motivated by the desire to re-establish a worldwide caliphate and who don&#039;t care if they die in the process. Something has to be done about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, what kool aid are you talking about? If I were trying to propose learned discourse on the theories of international relations on other conservative websites it would turn into some sort of circle jerk about the Bush doctrine. My advocacy of a partially interventionist foreign policy in areas relating directly to the national interest doesn&#8217;t make me a Sean Hannity lackey. That&#8217;s rather dismissive and ignorant, intellectually speaking. I read and get great ideas from across the spectrum of conservatism and libertarianism, and just because I might find some parts of the justifications for our current actions overseas logical and desireable doesn&#8217;t make me some sort of bloodthirsty 21st century Godfrey de Bouillon &#8220;neo-con&#8221; crusader type. Sure, I&#8217;m not a realist, per se, but I&#8217;m not some reformed ex-communist hawk either. The issues of foreign relations pertaining to the rabid bellicosity of certain places in the Middle East are a bit too poignant for me to say &#8220;You know what?Let&#8217;s just stay out of it-we don&#8217;t want to piss people off,right?&#8221;. I don&#8217;t live in political la la land and honestly think foreign entanglements won&#8217;t come to us, especially considering large amounts of people with relatively good military technology who are only motivated by the desire to re-establish a worldwide caliphate and who don&#8217;t care if they die in the process. Something has to be done about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Hawley</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/06/30/the-road-to-serfdom/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>George Hawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/postright/?p=440#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Hold on, let me get out my Neocon dictionary ... ah yes, here it is:

&quot;anti-Semite [an-tee-sem-ahyt], noun: A person who has ever questioned Sean Hannity&#039;s foreign policy proposals.&quot;

Sorry Jack, you&#039;re clearly an anti-Semite. 

As penance, you need to write 100 posts arguing that if Obama doesn&#039;t immediately nuke Tehran, he&#039;s exactly like Hitler and Jimmy Carter (which is redundant, because Carter is also exactly like Hitler).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold on, let me get out my Neocon dictionary &#8230; ah yes, here it is:</p>
<p>&#8220;anti-Semite [an-tee-sem-ahyt], noun: A person who has ever questioned Sean Hannity&#8217;s foreign policy proposals.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry Jack, you&#8217;re clearly an anti-Semite. </p>
<p>As penance, you need to write 100 posts arguing that if Obama doesn&#8217;t immediately nuke Tehran, he&#8217;s exactly like Hitler and Jimmy Carter (which is redundant, because Carter is also exactly like Hitler).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan P. Origer</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/06/30/the-road-to-serfdom/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan P. Origer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/postright/?p=440#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Tripp, please, man, for your own good, lay off of the Kool-Aid. You&#039;ve reached a point at which I&#039;m not sure anything but a snarky reply suffices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tripp, please, man, for your own good, lay off of the Kool-Aid. You&#8217;ve reached a point at which I&#8217;m not sure anything but a snarky reply suffices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tripp DeMoss</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/06/30/the-road-to-serfdom/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Tripp DeMoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/postright/?p=440#comment-260</guid>
		<description>So a Jewish person who&#039;s anti-Zionist? Well, now I&#039;ve heard everything.
And George- you&#039;ve almost got it right. Fascism means war, so you must prepare to defend yourself against it, and to go to war with it to protect yourself in many cases. Here&#039;s the scenario- Iran gets a nuke, fires it at Israel, and hits Tel Aviv. What does the US do? The solution that would be trumpeted here would be &quot;well it&#039;s their problem and we&#039;re safe in our hemisphere blah blah blah&quot;. That seems to defy logic in my opinion. All I&#039;m saying is that the US should retaliate in that situation. It&#039;s in our nation&#039;s interest to prevent the destruction of the state of Israel in that situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a Jewish person who&#8217;s anti-Zionist? Well, now I&#8217;ve heard everything.<br />
And George- you&#8217;ve almost got it right. Fascism means war, so you must prepare to defend yourself against it, and to go to war with it to protect yourself in many cases. Here&#8217;s the scenario- Iran gets a nuke, fires it at Israel, and hits Tel Aviv. What does the US do? The solution that would be trumpeted here would be &#8220;well it&#8217;s their problem and we&#8217;re safe in our hemisphere blah blah blah&#8221;. That seems to defy logic in my opinion. All I&#8217;m saying is that the US should retaliate in that situation. It&#8217;s in our nation&#8217;s interest to prevent the destruction of the state of Israel in that situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan P. Origer</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/06/30/the-road-to-serfdom/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan P. Origer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/postright/?p=440#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Patrick, I&#039;m pretty sure that, rather than WASP anti-Semite, Mr. Ross is, well, Jewish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Patrick, I&#8217;m pretty sure that, rather than WASP anti-Semite, Mr. Ross is, well, Jewish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Hawley</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/06/30/the-road-to-serfdom/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>George Hawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/postright/?p=440#comment-238</guid>
		<description>&quot;Besides,since when can nations live with fascism, be it leftist or nationalist in nature? Fascism means war- it is a part of it, it is indistinguishable from it.&quot;

So ... we must go to war with &quot;fascism&quot; because &quot;fascism means war.&quot; And, uh, war is bad, so we need to go to war against it, and we need to continue going to war against fascist war until there is no more war. Otherwise, &quot;western institutions&quot; will not be safe for &quot;all people.&quot;

Gotcha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Besides,since when can nations live with fascism, be it leftist or nationalist in nature? Fascism means war- it is a part of it, it is indistinguishable from it.&#8221;</p>
<p>So &#8230; we must go to war with &#8220;fascism&#8221; because &#8220;fascism means war.&#8221; And, uh, war is bad, so we need to go to war against it, and we need to continue going to war against fascist war until there is no more war. Otherwise, &#8220;western institutions&#8221; will not be safe for &#8220;all people.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gotcha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick J. Ford</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/06/30/the-road-to-serfdom/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick J. Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/postright/?p=440#comment-228</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t say this absolutely, but I am pretty sure Jack Ross is far from a WASP anti-Semite...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say this absolutely, but I am pretty sure Jack Ross is far from a WASP anti-Semite&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Road to Serfdom is Flat &#171; The Other Right</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/06/30/the-road-to-serfdom/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>The Road to Serfdom is Flat &#171; The Other Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/postright/?p=440#comment-225</guid>
		<description>[...] 30, 2009   Inspired by the recent slash-and-burn of Hayek up over at Post Right, I decided to go look up the cartoon version of the Road to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 30, 2009   Inspired by the recent slash-and-burn of Hayek up over at Post Right, I decided to go look up the cartoon version of the Road to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayek Endorses Friedman? &#171; The Other Right</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/postright/2009/06/30/the-road-to-serfdom/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayek Endorses Friedman? &#171; The Other Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/postright/?p=440#comment-224</guid>
		<description>[...] 30, 2009   Inspired by the recent slash-and-burn of Hayek up over at Post Right, I was inspired to go look up the cartoon version of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 30, 2009   Inspired by the recent slash-and-burn of Hayek up over at Post Right, I was inspired to go look up the cartoon version of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

