I saw the movie last night; my review is up on Millman’s Shakesblog. Please check it out.
As an aside: when I first joined TAC, I had a notion that it made sense to put “back of the book” and “front of the book” stuff separate. So, my theatre reviews and other coverage of the arts has all been posted at Millman’s Shakesblog, while everything else has appeared here.
But we’ve now got four bloggers on the front page, and at least one of them will inevitably do a whole lot more blogging about culture than he will about current affairs. So I’m wondering: does the split still make sense? Should I put everything here, theatre reviews and election speculation and everything? Should I cross-post in some fashion? Should we create something similar to State of the Union for irregular posting on culture and the arts?
Feel free to express your thoughts on this no-doubt thrilling subject in comments.



I think you’re nuts. It’s not like it’s hard for me to scroll past whatever I don’t want to read and the particular medium doesn’t require you to split the blogs. It only makes sense to me if _TAC_ is paying you differently for different kinds of content and even then they would need to figure out some smarter way to do it (or else posts like this one would cleverly screw them). Many is the time I have wished the Shakesblog would close up shop and just move back into the main blog.