“Political correctness is not that complicated. It is simply an effort to eradicate prejudices and verbal discrimination. It takes its roots in people’s desire to practice inclusiveness and tolerance. It is a sign of civility.”

No, it’s a degenerate secular form of New England Protestantism-though its major theoreticians have been Ashkenazim. But then most of the influential political thinkers of just about every extant political tendency in the US have been Ashenazi.

The project of PC/Multicult/Diversity is the dispossession/race replacement of the traditional American majority. This project is the result of national guilt over slavery and racism and intense aversion to anything suggestive of (non-Jewish) white racism due to the actions of the German NS regime.

I think this is really the bigger problem, namely, that the Republicans don’t run many populist candidates. There are plenty of suburban races where there is an economically moderate socially liberal Dem vs. econ. libertarian-ish and socially moderate GOPer. There are few with nationalist Republicans challenging populist Democrats.

The GOP at the Congressional level is just too homogeneous and does not reflect the party at large. The House Democrats, at least, have factions reflecting different backgrounds and different interests (social conservatives, labour-backed, progressive Left, black, hispanic, DLC). Yet, even working class Southern and Midwestern GOP districts get the typical suburban, small-govt rhetoric, free trading, social conservative at election time only-type of Congressman.