Comments on: Generation Rothbard II

By: Mad Doc MacRae

Mad Doc MacRae — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:34:55 +0000

Under 40? That’s a pretty liberal definition of young…

By: Red Phillips

Red Phillips — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:12:02 +0000

“Ron Paul is, at least from my calculations, a rambling reactionary.”

Rambling reactionary. I like that. Do you think it would be alright if I appropriated that for my own use? Then I can be both a “right-wing extremist” and a “rambling reactionary.” What a resume.

By: CD

CD — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:49:14 +0000

Ron Paul a reactionary? haaaaaa haaaaaa!
He has been talking about the fed for decades and predicted the financial meltdown years ago.

By: Scott Lahti

Scott Lahti — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:04:38 +0000

Here's a perfect example of why you should wait until you read to the end of a sentence before you pass judgment: I start reading Dan's final sentence (bolded) - Help take the campuses, and the country, back from the militarists of the Right and the centralizers of the Left - and as the last hands-across-the-statist-aisle hundred years of US history flash before my eyes like a flip-animated Deck of Presidents, I'm all, "Dude?" as I do a shock-reeling Warner Bros.-cartoon yayayayayaya double-take back up to Dan's byline, then resume his March of Time newsreel to its final frames - — and the centralizers of the Right and militarists of the Left, for that matter. - after which I'm all, "My man!", before I, mopping my brow, make to revive old-time radio singlehandedly with a script for the first episode of Tory Anarchist, Master of Suspense - before vowing to switch to decaf well ahead of future visits to this blog (fans self, sweating profusely, to no avail)...