Republican of Letters


(With a small-r, of course). George Scialabba on Gore Vidal:

The hacks of academe (new generation) have put it about that everything is political, especially textual analyses of great literature that reveal, through the application of emancipatory ideology and subversive wordplay, that the past was even less enlightened than the present. Besides allowing critical minnows to patronize artistic whales, this approach frees academic literary intellectuals from having to learn much about history, economics, politics or how to compose felicitous English prose.

Without ever saying so, Vidal also manages to suggest that everything is political, though in a very different, non-postmodern sense. The clarity and elegance of his prose, for example, make a political point: that a critic with public purposes has rhetorical obligations, above all transparency. More generally, to a sufficiently sensitive and knowledgeable critic, everything will appear intelligent or unintelligent, skillful or shoddy, graceful or graceless, truthful or mendacious. In each of these pairs, the latter is–not immediately, perhaps, but ultimately, in some measure–a threat to our common life, our res publica. Intellectual virtues are civic virtues; intellectual vices leave the citizens vulnerable to superstition and demagoguery. There is, of course, no more sense in trying to legislate the intellectual virtues than the moral ones. But one can propagate intellectual virtue, first of all by example. This is Vidal’s abiding contribution to American politics.

Share      Filed under: Books

3 Responses to “Republican of Letters”

  1. Great piece.

  2. George Scialabba, by the way, deserves the distinctions he has achieved, as well as an expanded audience – he has stuck to his last in turning out a good thirty years or so of general-purpose reviewing and criticism, nimbly and from outside the academy, and is thus of a rare and vanishing breed:

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Scialabba

    georgescialabba.net/

    On the degrees-of-of-separation front, Scialabba and I (along with Edward Said, Robert Alter, &c.) were among those reviewing George Steiner: A Reader in 1984-1985, he in The Village Voice Literary Supplement (VLS),

    georgescialabba.net/mtgs/1984/12/george-steiner-a-reader-oxford.html

    which review I seem to recall reading while manning the storefront weekends at Laissez-Faire Books on Mercer Street (NYC), just out of NYU (both the store location, as it happened, and my own BA studies in economics), and I in National Review

    docs.google.com/Doc?id=dfmk2t99_1343qqt4gv

    aleksandreia.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/serious-george-the-cunning-linguist-or-parody-on-parnassus/

    http://www.amazon.com/review/R3CV6OH0SSCNRV

    Re-reading Scialabba’s review of Steiner in admiration for possibly the first time since 1984, I’m struck by the unconscious thematic overlap I seem to have enacted in drafting my own shorter effort a month or so later.

  3. Here’s a good backgrounder on Scialabba:

    insidehighered.com/views/2006/08/09/mclemee

Leave a Reply