<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Thoughts on Paul&#8217;s Endorsement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccarthy/2008/09/23/quick-thoughts-on-pauls-endorsement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccarthy/2008/09/23/quick-thoughts-on-pauls-endorsement/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=quick-thoughts-on-pauls-endorsement</link>
	<description>www.ToryAnarchist.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: N. P. West</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccarthy/2008/09/23/quick-thoughts-on-pauls-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-1320</link>
		<dc:creator>N. P. West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 23:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toryanarchist.com/?p=774#comment-1320</guid>
		<description>Once again Constitution Party evangelicals are not the Religious Right of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell which haven&#039;t met a trade deal or war they didn&#039;t cheer for.  I&#039;m a traditionalist Catholic and I could really care less about Baldwin&#039;s religiosity.  He&#039;s right on the issues and that is what matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again Constitution Party evangelicals are not the Religious Right of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell which haven&#8217;t met a trade deal or war they didn&#8217;t cheer for.  I&#8217;m a traditionalist Catholic and I could really care less about Baldwin&#8217;s religiosity.  He&#8217;s right on the issues and that is what matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tory Anarchist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thoughts From the Southern Avenger</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccarthy/2008/09/23/quick-thoughts-on-pauls-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-1319</link>
		<dc:creator>The Tory Anarchist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thoughts From the Southern Avenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toryanarchist.com/?p=774#comment-1319</guid>
		<description>[...] The Tory Anarchist www.ToryAnarchist.com      &#171; The Tory Anarchist home page &#171; Quick Thoughts on Paul&#8217;s Endorsement [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Tory Anarchist <a href="http://www.ToryAnarchist.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ToryAnarchist.com</a>      &laquo; The Tory Anarchist home page &laquo; Quick Thoughts on Paul&#8217;s Endorsement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lowell</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccarthy/2008/09/23/quick-thoughts-on-pauls-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-1318</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toryanarchist.com/?p=774#comment-1318</guid>
		<description>Casey Kahn,

You&#039;re kind. Probably more precise to describe these folks as the adolescent libertarian left and they would be entireless without significance were it not for their virulent religion hating. Modern libertarianism is increasingly becoming the vehicle for a kind of sociopathology writ large, its adherents squads of relativist adult children who seemingly have never successfully to have resolved questions concerning Mom, Dad, and the Church. Religion and the truths thereof stand smack dab in their way, with libertarianism provides a perverse cover for their most sinister aspects. Don&#039;t be surprized if the next  political body to showcase brownshirts isn&#039;t libertarian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casey Kahn,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re kind. Probably more precise to describe these folks as the adolescent libertarian left and they would be entireless without significance were it not for their virulent religion hating. Modern libertarianism is increasingly becoming the vehicle for a kind of sociopathology writ large, its adherents squads of relativist adult children who seemingly have never successfully to have resolved questions concerning Mom, Dad, and the Church. Religion and the truths thereof stand smack dab in their way, with libertarianism provides a perverse cover for their most sinister aspects. Don&#8217;t be surprized if the next  political body to showcase brownshirts isn&#8217;t libertarian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Eggington</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccarthy/2008/09/23/quick-thoughts-on-pauls-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-1317</link>
		<dc:creator>William Eggington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 06:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toryanarchist.com/?p=774#comment-1317</guid>
		<description>But who&#039;s brand of virtue?  I consider myself a very religious person but I&#039;m fairly certain that my brand would conflict greatly with yours.  Ron Paul never once blurred the lines between church and state.  Chuck Baldwin on the other hand, from what little I have seen of him on-line, doesn&#039;t really even have a line.  Thats a huge turn off for me.

I believe I will still vote for him but it is Ron Paul that has brought me to him.  I don&#039;t see his views as being anywhere near as easy to swallow as Ron Paul&#039;s were for &quot;most&quot; people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But who&#8217;s brand of virtue?  I consider myself a very religious person but I&#8217;m fairly certain that my brand would conflict greatly with yours.  Ron Paul never once blurred the lines between church and state.  Chuck Baldwin on the other hand, from what little I have seen of him on-line, doesn&#8217;t really even have a line.  Thats a huge turn off for me.</p>
<p>I believe I will still vote for him but it is Ron Paul that has brought me to him.  I don&#8217;t see his views as being anywhere near as easy to swallow as Ron Paul&#8217;s were for &#8220;most&#8221; people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Khan</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccarthy/2008/09/23/quick-thoughts-on-pauls-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-1316</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toryanarchist.com/?p=774#comment-1316</guid>
		<description>I thought the Baldwin endorsement was great especially in light of Barr&#039;s ridiculous nonsense.

I&#039;m really getting sick of these left libertarians and their anti-religious bigotry.  Those fools are going to be suffering tremendously in their never ending assault on virtue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the Baldwin endorsement was great especially in light of Barr&#8217;s ridiculous nonsense.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really getting sick of these left libertarians and their anti-religious bigotry.  Those fools are going to be suffering tremendously in their never ending assault on virtue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

