8 Responses to “Ron Paul’s Party”

1. John Lowell, on September 20th, 2008 at 9:59 pm Said:

   Well, you certainly have the future with Jesse Ventura sized-up properly. Are we too early in identifying Ventura as the Alan Keyes of the Ron Paul movement? Lets hope that nightmare passes. And your pessimism as to whether the Paul thing will survive Paul and 2008 is well taken. History would almost require the presence of a identifiable personality at the head of any such “movement” for it to have meaningful impact in the future. That was certainly the case with Teddy Roosevelt and the Bull Moose Progressives, Bob La Follette, Henry and George Wallace and Ross Perot. So a Paul “movement” without Paul would seem at best problemmed, all of which points us to Paul’s poorly considered choice of eschewing an independent candidacy. All his continued presence in the Republican Party now serves to demonstrate is his pitiful obscurity, either that or something rather more self-centered.

2. jamie bath, on November 2nd, 2009 at 7:13 am Said:

   I certainly think its essential to keep one self upto date

3. Miervaldis, on December 29th, 2009 at 2:06 pm Said:

   Nice post! Looking forward for more good things form your side.

4. Zed Starflight, on May 25th, 2010 at 7:49 am Said:

   It has been a while since the last time I visit this blog. I just found out that this post is quite interesting. You have my thanks..

5. Fenerbahçe, on March 1st, 2011 at 12:32 pm Said:

   Very nice, thanks a sharing.

6. Enson Haber, on March 11th, 2011 at 5:52 pm Said:

   Very nice , thanks a sharing

7. Behringer, on March 20th, 2011 at 12:07 pm Said:

   Very nice , thanks a sharing.

8. Spor Haber, on September 21st, 2011 at 6:27 am Said:

   Very very nice, thanks a sharing

Leave a Reply