Human Events has endorsed Fred Thompson. Unhindered by any standard that requires a candidate to be viable, Human Events has made the logical choice, given that they obviously weren’t going to associate themselves with Ron Paul and the rest clearly fall short of their standards. It was interesting that they bothered to explain why they ruled out Paul. That’s more than most would do, I suppose. I do want to applaud Human Events for refusing to endorse any of the competitive candidates, and I don’t mean that sarcastically. There is an idea when it comes to such endorsements that you trivialise your influence on the process if you endorse a candidate who cannot realistically win the nomination, and they clearly reject that kind of thinking. (Having once predicted that Thompson would win the nod, mostly on the grounds that I could not see how the Republicans would nominate any of these others, I don’t think it is likely to happen now.) By endorsing Thompson, Human Events has at least helped to remind conservative voters how flawed the leading four really are.
from The American Conservative