Jeffrey Goldberg gives Obama some questionable advice ahead of his trip to Israel:
To the Israelis, Obama needs to say two things at once. The first is simple: He needs to tell Israelis that he loves them.
I expect that Obama will include the usual boilerplate about how important he believes the relationship with Israel to be, as he has so many times before, and Israelis that dislike and distrust him for whatever reason will continue to do so. If Obama did as Goldberg advised, this wouldn’t impress any of the skeptics, and it would probably be somewhat embarrassing to Israelis that view him favorably. Aaron David Miller has repeatedly argued that this sort of emotional connection isn’t how Obama relates to Israel personally (“Obama isn’t in love with the idea of Israel”), and I think that’s mostly right. The more important point is that the president shouldn’t be expected to feel a certain way about another country in order to support the policies that he already supports, and he shouldn’t be faulted if he doesn’t express these feelings in an overt or fawning manner. Besides, there are few things more off-putting than faking an intensity of feeling that one doesn’t genuinely have (see Romney, Mitt). Do we really expect our presidents to love other nations? Isn’t this exactly the sort of attachment that Washington warned against?
Frankly, if there’s one thing that the U.S.-Israel relationship doesn’t need, it is yet another declaration of love. There have been at least twenty years of these statements, and they have had few effects other than identifying the U.S. with Israeli policies in the eyes of most of the world. There’s nothing wrong with showing appreciation for normal, constructive relations with another government, and there’s nothing wrong with praising the people of the country that the president happens to be visiting. When American politicians constantly gush about how much they adore Israel and the U.S.-Israel relationship (which is only slightly exaggerated in the recent SNL sketch), they act as enablers of reckless behavior and policies that will in the long-term be harmful to Israel. They also make themselves look ridiculous, but that’s a topic for another post.
I’m fairly confident that Obama isn’t going to cause himself a needless headache by revisiting the issue of settlements in a big way during his trip. He mishandled the issue in his first year, and it caused him a lot of grief there and in Washington without changing anything for the better. It would be surprising if he decided to do the same thing at the start of his second term.



Jeffrey Goldberg
Stop right there. Nothing more needs to be said. Why does anyone take this snake seriously. He left the US to serve in the Israeli military because of disgust with gentile America, and then left Israel to pursue fame and fortune in that same gentile America.
As usual in foreign policy matters, the Father of Our Country (not Jeffrey Goldberg’s country) put it best:
So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation), facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.