fbpx
Politics Foreign Affairs Culture Fellows Program

Carney and “Skepticism of Big Business”

If big business is getting its way, then its way does not lead towards freedom and laissez faire. Indeed, take two of the most notorious giants of industry, Wal-Mart and Phillip Morris, and look at what they are doing in Washington. Wal-Mart made news last month when it called for a raise in the federal […]

If big business is getting its way, then its way does not lead towards freedom and laissez faire.

Indeed, take two of the most notorious giants of industry, Wal-Mart and Phillip Morris, and look at what they are doing in Washington.

Wal-Mart made news last month when it called for a raise in the federal minimum wage–something Democrats typically welcome. Despite its reputation for paying slave wages, Wal-Mart on average pays its hourly full-time employees $10.53 per hour, according to the company’s website. The current federal minimum wage is $5.15 an hour.

So, if minimum wage goes up, Wal-Mart might not pay an extra dime in wages. But Mom ‘n Pop corner stores–Wal-Mart’s competition–who employ local High School students at or near minimum wage will be in a pickle. The small stores might just have to close their doors, driving even more business to the retail giant–that is if Wal-Mart gets its way in Washington.

And what about evil Phillip Morris? What is it lobbying for on Capitol Hill? Check the company’s annual report to find out. The 2005 Altria Group annual report states that the company: “endorsed federal legislation introduced in May 2004 in the Senate and the House of Representatives, known as the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, which would have granted the FDA the authority to regulate the design, manufacture and marketing of cigarettes and disclosures of related information.”

In other words, Phillip Morris is on Ted Kennedy’s side in supporting greater federal regulation of tobacco. This regulation, of course, would be more burdensome to smaller cigarette companies than to Phillip Morris, which controls nearly half of the industry.

So, conservatives and libertarians ought to agree: yes, big business influence in Washington is dangerous. ~Timothy P. Carney, Brainwash

Mr. Carney tackles some of the deleterious effects of big business, or in this particular case the effects of big business influence on government, in a way that should be appealing to traditional conservatives and libertarians, albeit for different reasons. His examples also serve as welcome reminders that large-scale corporations can often benefit from greater government regulation to the extent that the regulation itself reinforces monopolistic tendencies in their sector. Being someone that Wal-Mart might regard as “pro-business” is obviously a far cry from being someone who values the integrity of a competitive market. It is this sort of common sense aversion to the power of the national and multinational corporation that Mr. Dreher and his “crunchy con” folk seem to share.

Advertisement

Comments

The American Conservative Memberships
Become a Member today for a growing stake in the conservative movement.
Join here!
Join here