<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mount Vernon Statement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/02/16/the-mount-vernon-statement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/02/16/the-mount-vernon-statement/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-mount-vernon-statement</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balloon Juice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; That Sound You Hear Is Washington Rolling In His Grave</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/02/16/the-mount-vernon-statement/comment-page-1/#comment-35367</link>
		<dc:creator>Balloon Juice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; That Sound You Hear Is Washington Rolling In His Grave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10748#comment-35367</guid>
		<description>[...] I was going to make fun of the whole Mount Vernon nonsense, in which all the same frauds who brought you the last eight years got together and wrapped themselves up in the Constitution then went out for filets and drinks, but Daniel Larison seems to have it covered ok: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was going to make fun of the whole Mount Vernon nonsense, in which all the same frauds who brought you the last eight years got together and wrapped themselves up in the Constitution then went out for filets and drinks, but Daniel Larison seems to have it covered ok: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;The First Draft, Not the Compromised Second Draft&#8221; &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/02/16/the-mount-vernon-statement/comment-page-1/#comment-35365</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;The First Draft, Not the Compromised Second Draft&#8221; &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10748#comment-35365</guid>
		<description>[...] for bridging the gap between libertarians/paleocons and neo-conservatives on foreign policy (see Larison for a more fully developed argument on this point), nor does it provide any guidance as to how one would determine whether a particular policy fits [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for bridging the gap between libertarians/paleocons and neo-conservatives on foreign policy (see Larison for a more fully developed argument on this point), nor does it provide any guidance as to how one would determine whether a particular policy fits [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dobermanmacleod</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/02/16/the-mount-vernon-statement/comment-page-1/#comment-35361</link>
		<dc:creator>dobermanmacleod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10748#comment-35361</guid>
		<description>OK, I&#039;m officially impressed.  Mr Larison hit the nail right on the head.  Unfortunately, &quot;old fashion&quot; conservatism is quaint, since corporatism and authoritarianism is the way to political power, the apparent true motivation of modern conservatism.  With the recent US Supreme Court decision allowing unlimited corporate funds to be spend on political advertisement (uber-judicial activism by conservative judges stacked by Republican administrations), the Republican party can expect a political zenith.  More pre-emptive invasions, curtailment of civil rights in the name of national security, and a pro-corporate/anti-regulatory/anti-consumer environment.  George Washington is turning in his grave (along with those genuine &quot;old fashion&quot; conservatives).  Ironically, fascism in conservative clothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;m officially impressed.  Mr Larison hit the nail right on the head.  Unfortunately, &#8220;old fashion&#8221; conservatism is quaint, since corporatism and authoritarianism is the way to political power, the apparent true motivation of modern conservatism.  With the recent US Supreme Court decision allowing unlimited corporate funds to be spend on political advertisement (uber-judicial activism by conservative judges stacked by Republican administrations), the Republican party can expect a political zenith.  More pre-emptive invasions, curtailment of civil rights in the name of national security, and a pro-corporate/anti-regulatory/anti-consumer environment.  George Washington is turning in his grave (along with those genuine &#8220;old fashion&#8221; conservatives).  Ironically, fascism in conservative clothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norwegian Shooter</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/02/16/the-mount-vernon-statement/comment-page-1/#comment-35357</link>
		<dc:creator>Norwegian Shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10748#comment-35357</guid>
		<description>Whoops, google error, shoulda known better. First link is to a local AR group that opposes Mike Ross. Still, it&#039;s funny.

The &quot;real&quot; Conservative Action Project, doesn&#039;t have a website, but is related somehow to the Center for National Policy. Second link is still good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, google error, shoulda known better. First link is to a local AR group that opposes Mike Ross. Still, it&#8217;s funny.</p>
<p>The &#8220;real&#8221; Conservative Action Project, doesn&#8217;t have a website, but is related somehow to the Center for National Policy. Second link is still good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norwegian Shooter</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/02/16/the-mount-vernon-statement/comment-page-1/#comment-35354</link>
		<dc:creator>Norwegian Shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 05:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10748#comment-35354</guid>
		<description>First, this is an Ed Meese deal? Oh, my. I can&#039;t think of anyone more of an old white guy than Meese. And I still chuckle at his name after all these years. Party of ideas, eh? 1980&#039;s ideas, sure.

Second, speaking of old, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://conservativeactionproject.org/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Conservative Action Project&#039;s website&lt;/a&gt; sure is spiffy. Just a few of the funnies:

&quot;A look back in time to the early 1920&#039;s will show us a free market, supply-side plan that does work,&quot; and &quot;One of Ronald Reagan&#039;s favorite presidents was Calvin Coolidge.&quot; Thank goodness they had the technical know-how to include a YouTube video - wait, it&#039;s called &quot;Fred Thompson on the Economy.&quot; Oh, well. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rightwingwatch.org/category/groups/conservative-action-project&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;More goods&lt;/a&gt; on the Conservative Action Project. 

But back to the Mount Vernon thingy. At the end of the TAS article is this gem: &quot;We&#039;re hoping this will be picked up by the Tea Party activists as a framework,&quot; says Congressman David McIntosh (R-Ind). &quot;To have an impact, it must come from the people.&quot; So, you got together a bunch of retreads and issued a manifesto. Good luck with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, this is an Ed Meese deal? Oh, my. I can&#8217;t think of anyone more of an old white guy than Meese. And I still chuckle at his name after all these years. Party of ideas, eh? 1980&#8242;s ideas, sure.</p>
<p>Second, speaking of old, the <a href="http://conservativeactionproject.org/index.html" rel="nofollow">Conservative Action Project&#8217;s website</a> sure is spiffy. Just a few of the funnies:</p>
<p>&#8220;A look back in time to the early 1920&#8242;s will show us a free market, supply-side plan that does work,&#8221; and &#8220;One of Ronald Reagan&#8217;s favorite presidents was Calvin Coolidge.&#8221; Thank goodness they had the technical know-how to include a YouTube video &#8211; wait, it&#8217;s called &#8220;Fred Thompson on the Economy.&#8221; Oh, well. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/category/groups/conservative-action-project" rel="nofollow">More goods</a> on the Conservative Action Project. </p>
<p>But back to the Mount Vernon thingy. At the end of the TAS article is this gem: &#8220;We&#8217;re hoping this will be picked up by the Tea Party activists as a framework,&#8221; says Congressman David McIntosh (R-Ind). &#8220;To have an impact, it must come from the people.&#8221; So, you got together a bunch of retreads and issued a manifesto. Good luck with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Dooley</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/02/16/the-mount-vernon-statement/comment-page-1/#comment-35352</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Dooley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10748#comment-35352</guid>
		<description>What you have written here is all so true. And the truth leaves so little room for hope that the American ship of state can ever right itself.  Foreign entanglements, preemptive war, political aristocracy calculating the borders of torture in the bowels of the White House, this is conservativism?  Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran.  So sorry our..., I mean the drone killed the bride, but drones are, well, drones.  Hey Amigo, will you take a hundred bucks to make it right?  
Conservatives?  Sticks, stones, and worse than senseless things.
They can take their manifesto and shove it where the sun don&#039;t shine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you have written here is all so true. And the truth leaves so little room for hope that the American ship of state can ever right itself.  Foreign entanglements, preemptive war, political aristocracy calculating the borders of torture in the bowels of the White House, this is conservativism?  Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran.  So sorry our&#8230;, I mean the drone killed the bride, but drones are, well, drones.  Hey Amigo, will you take a hundred bucks to make it right?<br />
Conservatives?  Sticks, stones, and worse than senseless things.<br />
They can take their manifesto and shove it where the sun don&#8217;t shine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

