<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Derailed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/01/28/derailed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/01/28/derailed/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=derailed</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/01/28/derailed/comment-page-1/#comment-35101</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10613#comment-35101</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s imagine that the country accepts the agenda of one Party but parts of that Party&#039;s leadership, say in one chamber of the national legislature, are rotten and can&#039;t deliver on the agenda.  The ideal course of action, given that no Party self-corrects, would be to knock out this rotten leadership by electing enough members of the opposition Party to that chamber of the legislature.  This opposition would optimally, in the view of swing voters, be united in opposition to this defective leadership but be incoherent in policy and individually objectionable, as well as obviously incompetent at governance.  These traits would make its members very easy to vote out as soon as the majority party installs better leadership.

This is a totally hypothetical scenario, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s imagine that the country accepts the agenda of one Party but parts of that Party&#8217;s leadership, say in one chamber of the national legislature, are rotten and can&#8217;t deliver on the agenda.  The ideal course of action, given that no Party self-corrects, would be to knock out this rotten leadership by electing enough members of the opposition Party to that chamber of the legislature.  This opposition would optimally, in the view of swing voters, be united in opposition to this defective leadership but be incoherent in policy and individually objectionable, as well as obviously incompetent at governance.  These traits would make its members very easy to vote out as soon as the majority party installs better leadership.</p>
<p>This is a totally hypothetical scenario, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/01/28/derailed/comment-page-1/#comment-35100</link>
		<dc:creator>Mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10613#comment-35100</guid>
		<description>I think the problem is with the base at least as much as the leaders. 

The base believes in four things: The US should be the world policeman. Medicare costs should not be scrutinized. Taxes should always be cut. The budget deficits should be reduced.
 
There seems to be no recognition that these goals conflict. If The GOP gets back in power soon the budget will be a bigger mess then last time thanks to all the talk about death panels and Medicare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem is with the base at least as much as the leaders. </p>
<p>The base believes in four things: The US should be the world policeman. Medicare costs should not be scrutinized. Taxes should always be cut. The budget deficits should be reduced.</p>
<p>There seems to be no recognition that these goals conflict. If The GOP gets back in power soon the budget will be a bigger mess then last time thanks to all the talk about death panels and Medicare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norwegian Shooter</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/01/28/derailed/comment-page-1/#comment-35099</link>
		<dc:creator>Norwegian Shooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10613#comment-35099</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Aaron, the stick has never been how well the country is doing (we couldn&#039;t even ever agree on what doing well means), it is how well is your party doing compared to the other. Take the last paragraph, slightly altered:&lt;blockquote&gt;Are the Dems in a worse position than a year ago? Beyond a couple of local elections, no, they aren&#039;t. Once we get past the surface, however, the same stagnant, intellectually bankrupt, unimaginative New Democrats and Blue Dogs that helped to bring our country to its current predicament is still there and has not changed in any meaningful way in the last ten years. Why would they? The party’s leaders are awash in campaign contributions, its pundits are reveling in the luxury of making fun of the opposition, and its rank-and-file has been whipped into such a state of agitation over their own impotence that their first priority is to run primary challenges in major races across the country. It may seem that the GOP have derailed their agenda, but in reality it is the Dems that went off the rails long ago and has yet to begin to recover.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Aaron, the stick has never been how well the country is doing (we couldn&#8217;t even ever agree on what doing well means), it is how well is your party doing compared to the other. Take the last paragraph, slightly altered:<br />
<blockquote>Are the Dems in a worse position than a year ago? Beyond a couple of local elections, no, they aren&#8217;t. Once we get past the surface, however, the same stagnant, intellectually bankrupt, unimaginative New Democrats and Blue Dogs that helped to bring our country to its current predicament is still there and has not changed in any meaningful way in the last ten years. Why would they? The party’s leaders are awash in campaign contributions, its pundits are reveling in the luxury of making fun of the opposition, and its rank-and-file has been whipped into such a state of agitation over their own impotence that their first priority is to run primary challenges in major races across the country. It may seem that the GOP have derailed their agenda, but in reality it is the Dems that went off the rails long ago and has yet to begin to recover.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balloon Juice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Crazy train</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/01/28/derailed/comment-page-1/#comment-35097</link>
		<dc:creator>Balloon Juice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Crazy train</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10613#comment-35097</guid>
		<description>[...] Daniel Larison takes the long view on Republican obstructionism: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Daniel Larison takes the long view on Republican obstructionism: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Young Geezer</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/01/28/derailed/comment-page-1/#comment-35096</link>
		<dc:creator>Young Geezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10613#comment-35096</guid>
		<description>&quot;they will attempt to cover these mistakes with temporary, tactical solutions that simply put off the consequences of their terrible decisions until someone else is in office. They will then exploit the situation as much as they possibly can, pinning the blame for their errors on their hapless inheritors and hoping that the latter are so pitiful that they retreat into yet another defensive crouch.&quot;

It sounds like the GOP has learned the RIGHT lesson: try to get away with everything you can while in power, and blame it all on your opponents when you&#039;re the opposition...to win back power.  Repeat.  The public seems to have a short enough attention span as not to remember these things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;they will attempt to cover these mistakes with temporary, tactical solutions that simply put off the consequences of their terrible decisions until someone else is in office. They will then exploit the situation as much as they possibly can, pinning the blame for their errors on their hapless inheritors and hoping that the latter are so pitiful that they retreat into yet another defensive crouch.&#8221;</p>
<p>It sounds like the GOP has learned the RIGHT lesson: try to get away with everything you can while in power, and blame it all on your opponents when you&#8217;re the opposition&#8230;to win back power.  Repeat.  The public seems to have a short enough attention span as not to remember these things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2010/01/28/derailed/comment-page-1/#comment-35095</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10613#comment-35095</guid>
		<description>How harmful is it to a political party to be &quot;stagnant, intellectually bankrupt,  [and] unimaginative&quot; when the other political party is arguably no better? Note, I&#039;m not asking whether it&#039;s harmful to the country....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How harmful is it to a political party to be &#8220;stagnant, intellectually bankrupt,  [and] unimaginative&#8221; when the other political party is arguably no better? Note, I&#8217;m not asking whether it&#8217;s harmful to the country&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

