<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Railing Against Bailouts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/11/23/railing-against-bailouts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/11/23/railing-against-bailouts/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=railing-against-bailouts</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bayesian</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/11/23/railing-against-bailouts/comment-page-1/#comment-34330</link>
		<dc:creator>bayesian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10322#comment-34330</guid>
		<description>GOM, that may not be entirely fair.  I&#039;m not sure the main mass of the GOP was particularly imperialistic in the Twenties and early Thirties, though I could be wrong on that.  

Consistently driven to pants wetting over the Red Menace (Green Menace after 1991) du jour, yes, but the imperialistic response to that is post-WW2 IMHO.

nb I&#039;m not saying there wasn&#039;t a Red Menace then or that there isn&#039;t a Green Menace now - I&#039;m critiquing the menace hyping / pants wetting / tantrumy responses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOM, that may not be entirely fair.  I&#8217;m not sure the main mass of the GOP was particularly imperialistic in the Twenties and early Thirties, though I could be wrong on that.  </p>
<p>Consistently driven to pants wetting over the Red Menace (Green Menace after 1991) du jour, yes, but the imperialistic response to that is post-WW2 IMHO.</p>
<p>nb I&#8217;m not saying there wasn&#8217;t a Red Menace then or that there isn&#8217;t a Green Menace now &#8211; I&#8217;m critiquing the menace hyping / pants wetting / tantrumy responses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BarryD</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/11/23/railing-against-bailouts/comment-page-1/#comment-34314</link>
		<dc:creator>BarryD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10322#comment-34314</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d add that the problem lay in the deregulation.  Once enormous firms had congealed, with vast positions which were extremely highly leveraged, we were in the sh*t.  Especially as, given the current laws, judges a prosecutors, a Nuremburg Trial (followed by a mass hanging) of Wall St executives was never in the cards.   

Wall St was allowed to mass enormous power, with no counter-vailing force.  Quelle surprise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d add that the problem lay in the deregulation.  Once enormous firms had congealed, with vast positions which were extremely highly leveraged, we were in the sh*t.  Especially as, given the current laws, judges a prosecutors, a Nuremburg Trial (followed by a mass hanging) of Wall St executives was never in the cards.   </p>
<p>Wall St was allowed to mass enormous power, with no counter-vailing force.  Quelle surprise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy Old Man</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/11/23/railing-against-bailouts/comment-page-1/#comment-34302</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpy Old Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10322#comment-34302</guid>
		<description>The GOP has always been the party of big capital, centralization, and imperialism, now joined by most Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP has always been the party of big capital, centralization, and imperialism, now joined by most Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

