<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Sentiment Replaces Judgment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/06/21/when-sentiment-replaces-judgment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/06/21/when-sentiment-replaces-judgment/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=when-sentiment-replaces-judgment</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/06/21/when-sentiment-replaces-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-32943</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9747#comment-32943</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t followed British politics closely for a long time but it is not clear to me that &quot;insufferable Blairite moralizing&quot; is actually unpopular with the British electorate.  What did for Blair was his proven deceptions over Iraq and the perception that he was too subservient to Bush (along with a host of domestic issues).  But when I lived in England, I always got the sense that there was a constituency for Blair&#039;s grandstanding as a peacemaker, that it fed into a sort of post-colonial, middle class English sense of global responsibility.  Cameron&#039;s position could be wrong on the substance but right on the politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t followed British politics closely for a long time but it is not clear to me that &#8220;insufferable Blairite moralizing&#8221; is actually unpopular with the British electorate.  What did for Blair was his proven deceptions over Iraq and the perception that he was too subservient to Bush (along with a host of domestic issues).  But when I lived in England, I always got the sense that there was a constituency for Blair&#8217;s grandstanding as a peacemaker, that it fed into a sort of post-colonial, middle class English sense of global responsibility.  Cameron&#8217;s position could be wrong on the substance but right on the politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

