<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Need For Eunomia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/05/21/the-need-for-eunomia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/05/21/the-need-for-eunomia/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-need-for-eunomia</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordianus</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/05/21/the-need-for-eunomia/comment-page-1/#comment-32320</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordianus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 18:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9504#comment-32320</guid>
		<description>What strikes me about the above is the similarity to Robert Bork&#039;s thoughts about remnants preserving our culture where we can in the face of a civilizational breakdown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What strikes me about the above is the similarity to Robert Bork&#8217;s thoughts about remnants preserving our culture where we can in the face of a civilizational breakdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silva012682</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/05/21/the-need-for-eunomia/comment-page-1/#comment-32308</link>
		<dc:creator>silva012682</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9504#comment-32308</guid>
		<description>And just to follow up on Jake&#039;s point, I believe all politics is so local that it starts in the human heart and then radiates out from there.  I think any totalitarian mindset misses this point as they cannot control all arbitrary violence and suffering.  We can only do our part starting in our homes, with our families, our friends and finally in our churches, and communities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just to follow up on Jake&#8217;s point, I believe all politics is so local that it starts in the human heart and then radiates out from there.  I think any totalitarian mindset misses this point as they cannot control all arbitrary violence and suffering.  We can only do our part starting in our homes, with our families, our friends and finally in our churches, and communities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silva012682</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/05/21/the-need-for-eunomia/comment-page-1/#comment-32307</link>
		<dc:creator>silva012682</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9504#comment-32307</guid>
		<description>Daniel, this reminds me of Paul&#039;s injunction to be content and serve God in whatever situation we find ourselves in.  In I Corinthians 7, Paul says, &quot;Only, as the Lord has assigned to each one, as God has called each, in this manner let him walk.&quot;  This passage has always struck me personally as an indication of Paul&#039;s underlying conservative mind as it relates to ethics.  In other words, &quot;self-formation&quot; rather than radical changes.  This has echoes of Jesus&#039; injunction to shake the dust off of your feet regarding trying to change others.  By the way, I&#039;m curious why the author used the word &quot;insensibly.&quot;  Any ideas what function that serves in the sentence?  I don&#039;t think there is anything insensible about that kind of shift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, this reminds me of Paul&#8217;s injunction to be content and serve God in whatever situation we find ourselves in.  In I Corinthians 7, Paul says, &#8220;Only, as the Lord has assigned to each one, as God has called each, in this manner let him walk.&#8221;  This passage has always struck me personally as an indication of Paul&#8217;s underlying conservative mind as it relates to ethics.  In other words, &#8220;self-formation&#8221; rather than radical changes.  This has echoes of Jesus&#8217; injunction to shake the dust off of your feet regarding trying to change others.  By the way, I&#8217;m curious why the author used the word &#8220;insensibly.&#8221;  Any ideas what function that serves in the sentence?  I don&#8217;t think there is anything insensible about that kind of shift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake - butnottheone</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/05/21/the-need-for-eunomia/comment-page-1/#comment-32300</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake - butnottheone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9504#comment-32300</guid>
		<description>Daniel, I might disagree with you on occasion (clearly not always, or even often) but I commend you for your efforts to establish eunomia in your own little corner of the world.  If all politics is local, so is order, restraint in the exercise of power, and the acceptance of limits. I&#039;m not so sure about asceticism, and kenosis carries with it entirely too much religion, even though in principle I am okay with kenosis.

I like reading you. Thanks for writing.

Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, I might disagree with you on occasion (clearly not always, or even often) but I commend you for your efforts to establish eunomia in your own little corner of the world.  If all politics is local, so is order, restraint in the exercise of power, and the acceptance of limits. I&#8217;m not so sure about asceticism, and kenosis carries with it entirely too much religion, even though in principle I am okay with kenosis.</p>
<p>I like reading you. Thanks for writing.</p>
<p>Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

