<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dictatorships And No (Intellectual) Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanya</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-31616</link>
		<dc:creator>vanya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31616</guid>
		<description>Of course Sibelius wasn&#039;t Russian, but he was a subject of the Tsar, the Russian Empire was actually far more &quot;multicultural&quot; than the Soviet Empire that followed. I don&#039;t want to glorify the Tsars, but Americans&#039; rosy depictions of the British Empire ignore the fact that life for many in India and Africa, or even Ireland, wasn&#039;t really any better than being a Ukrainian peasant or Kyrgyz herdsman under the Tsars, and was arguably worse.  The fact that so many victims of the pogroms emigrated to the West in the early 20th century has created a somewhat slanted picture in the US of what late Tsarist Russia was really like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Sibelius wasn&#8217;t Russian, but he was a subject of the Tsar, the Russian Empire was actually far more &#8220;multicultural&#8221; than the Soviet Empire that followed. I don&#8217;t want to glorify the Tsars, but Americans&#8217; rosy depictions of the British Empire ignore the fact that life for many in India and Africa, or even Ireland, wasn&#8217;t really any better than being a Ukrainian peasant or Kyrgyz herdsman under the Tsars, and was arguably worse.  The fact that so many victims of the pogroms emigrated to the West in the early 20th century has created a somewhat slanted picture in the US of what late Tsarist Russia was really like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottovbvs</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-31612</link>
		<dc:creator>ottovbvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31612</guid>
		<description>vanya, on April 23rd, 2009 at 9:24 am Said: 

.....While not quite joining your somewhat rosy depiction of Russia in 1913, there&#039;s no real comparison with Britain, certainly the injustice and brutality of the Czarist state pale by comparison with the Soviet Union. Sibelius was technically a Russian composer since Finland was part of the Russian Empire at the time but somehow I don&#039;t think he&#039;d have regarded himself as a Russian composer. Overall though the collapse of the Romanov imperium was a disaster as was the collapse of the Hapsburg and Hohenzollern monarchies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vanya, on April 23rd, 2009 at 9:24 am Said: </p>
<p>&#8230;..While not quite joining your somewhat rosy depiction of Russia in 1913, there&#8217;s no real comparison with Britain, certainly the injustice and brutality of the Czarist state pale by comparison with the Soviet Union. Sibelius was technically a Russian composer since Finland was part of the Russian Empire at the time but somehow I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;d have regarded himself as a Russian composer. Overall though the collapse of the Romanov imperium was a disaster as was the collapse of the Hapsburg and Hohenzollern monarchies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pacific moderate</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-31608</link>
		<dc:creator>Pacific moderate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31608</guid>
		<description>Vanya, Sibelius would have bristled at being chacterized as a Russian composer ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vanya, Sibelius would have bristled at being chacterized as a Russian composer ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJM</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-31607</link>
		<dc:creator>JJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31607</guid>
		<description>Tangentially, the wanna-be military types of the blogosphere are all up in arms because Russia has deployed its Black Sea fleet and asked that NATO discontinue military exercises in Georgia.  They say this is evidence of a coming Russian invasion of Georgia.  IMO, that the bar has been set so low for evidence of impending doom is a consequence of Bush-era idiocy, and I can&#039;t wait until these people can relax again, for my sake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tangentially, the wanna-be military types of the blogosphere are all up in arms because Russia has deployed its Black Sea fleet and asked that NATO discontinue military exercises in Georgia.  They say this is evidence of a coming Russian invasion of Georgia.  IMO, that the bar has been set so low for evidence of impending doom is a consequence of Bush-era idiocy, and I can&#8217;t wait until these people can relax again, for my sake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanya</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-31606</link>
		<dc:creator>vanya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31606</guid>
		<description>The historical ignorance in the West about late Tsarist Russia is astonishing. Russia in 1913 was an economically dynamic, culturally vibrant place.  It had one of the fastest growing economies in the world and appeared to many contemporaries to have a bright future. To single out Tsarist Russia for being &quot;oppressive&quot; in an era when Great Britain was shooting Irish and Indian dissidents, Germany was forcing its Polish subjects to learn German, Japan was forcibly turning Koreans into second-class Japanese, and France, Holland and Portugal were all running brutal overseas empires, and America treated its Black citizens as brutally as Russian serfs were ever treated, seems a little biased. Late Tsarist Russia had a lot of flaws, but it also produced writers like Chekhov, Akhmatova, Bely, Tsvetaeva, and Mandelshtam composers like Prokofiev and Sibelius, engineers like Sikorsky, scientists like Abram Ioffe and  politicians like Stolypin and Nabokov pere, on and on. Just reading any Russian literature from that period would give you a sense how much freer and open that society was than anything Russia has seen since.  Pretty much any Soviet accomplishment was built directly on the foundations laid in the late 19th century. It&#039;s no surprise that the history of Soviet arts, literature, science and industry is one of almost constant decline the further you move forward from 1918.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The historical ignorance in the West about late Tsarist Russia is astonishing. Russia in 1913 was an economically dynamic, culturally vibrant place.  It had one of the fastest growing economies in the world and appeared to many contemporaries to have a bright future. To single out Tsarist Russia for being &#8220;oppressive&#8221; in an era when Great Britain was shooting Irish and Indian dissidents, Germany was forcing its Polish subjects to learn German, Japan was forcibly turning Koreans into second-class Japanese, and France, Holland and Portugal were all running brutal overseas empires, and America treated its Black citizens as brutally as Russian serfs were ever treated, seems a little biased. Late Tsarist Russia had a lot of flaws, but it also produced writers like Chekhov, Akhmatova, Bely, Tsvetaeva, and Mandelshtam composers like Prokofiev and Sibelius, engineers like Sikorsky, scientists like Abram Ioffe and  politicians like Stolypin and Nabokov pere, on and on. Just reading any Russian literature from that period would give you a sense how much freer and open that society was than anything Russia has seen since.  Pretty much any Soviet accomplishment was built directly on the foundations laid in the late 19th century. It&#8217;s no surprise that the history of Soviet arts, literature, science and industry is one of almost constant decline the further you move forward from 1918.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Larison</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-31605</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Larison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31605</guid>
		<description>In fairness to the Estonians, this was the result of a security breach and not a deliberate policy move.  Russian intelligence had infiltrated their defense ministry and bought off a top official, who handed over the information starting from the time Estonia joined the Alliance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fairness to the Estonians, this was the result of a security breach and not a deliberate policy move.  Russian intelligence had infiltrated their defense ministry and bought off a top official, who handed over the information starting from the time Estonia joined the Alliance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJM</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-31604</link>
		<dc:creator>JJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31604</guid>
		<description>The mention of Estonia is even funnier, given that Estonia is, at least in a limited fashion, working with Russia; they were caught relaying NATO communiqu&#233;s to Moscow soon after their admittance.

As far as the successor states go, it is my understanding that while they were in the USSR, the Central Asian states received a flood of money and supplies from Moscow.   Their subsequent expulsion from Russia has led to a drastic decrease in quality of life, more so than what is seen in rural Russia.  There&#039;s an argument to be made that the Central Asian states are better off with Russian support, even if that means a loss of autonomy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mention of Estonia is even funnier, given that Estonia is, at least in a limited fashion, working with Russia; they were caught relaying NATO communiqu&eacute;s to Moscow soon after their admittance.</p>
<p>As far as the successor states go, it is my understanding that while they were in the USSR, the Central Asian states received a flood of money and supplies from Moscow.   Their subsequent expulsion from Russia has led to a drastic decrease in quality of life, more so than what is seen in rural Russia.  There&#8217;s an argument to be made that the Central Asian states are better off with Russian support, even if that means a loss of autonomy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottovbvs</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-31602</link>
		<dc:creator>ottovbvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31602</guid>
		<description>&quot;And its not especially coherent as to why reclaiming alot of these relatively minor countries would be worth the trouble.&quot;

There&#039;s some merit in this argument but not a lot ultimately for a nation that basically wants it&#039;s great power status restored and some of these territories are strategically and economically valuable eg. the Ukraine. Sean you&#039;re philosophising but not really addressing my point that an agglomeration of weak successor states existing in the neighborhood of a 500 lb bear is an inherently unstable system. Russia could move on any of them and the west wouldn&#039;t do much both because of an underlying feeling that they are basically part of the Russian body politic (like the Rhineland and Germany), and it&#039;s not worth a major war. You mention Estonia, oddly enough I don&#039;t think they are really interested in the Baltics which they regard as rather like Poland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And its not especially coherent as to why reclaiming alot of these relatively minor countries would be worth the trouble.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s some merit in this argument but not a lot ultimately for a nation that basically wants it&#8217;s great power status restored and some of these territories are strategically and economically valuable eg. the Ukraine. Sean you&#8217;re philosophising but not really addressing my point that an agglomeration of weak successor states existing in the neighborhood of a 500 lb bear is an inherently unstable system. Russia could move on any of them and the west wouldn&#8217;t do much both because of an underlying feeling that they are basically part of the Russian body politic (like the Rhineland and Germany), and it&#8217;s not worth a major war. You mention Estonia, oddly enough I don&#8217;t think they are really interested in the Baltics which they regard as rather like Poland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean S.</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-31601</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31601</guid>
		<description>&quot;Russia has legitimate claims on most of these small countries some of which have been part of Russia for centuries. Furthermore she is relative to everyone around her a superpower. When you create a situation like this which is an almost exact analog of that existing in Eastern Europe and he Balkans in the interwar years it is inherently unstable.&quot;

Around her doesn&#039;t really matter, except for geo-political chicanery where international relations is nothing more than a game of Risk writ large, a point that Putin keeps insisting on driving home by playing games, provoked or unprovoked, with countries around its periphery that end up with its economy and foreign exchange getting pummeled. It reminds of a prominent jihadist who pointed out that the logic of al-Qaeda vis a vis &quot;getting back&quot; at America was horribly me myopic; for the act of bombing 3000, they&#039;ve managed to get millions more killed and left a whole region in tatters.

In many of the same ways that America&#039;s own foreign dalliances end up costing us significantly more than we ever wanted, so is it with Russia&#039;s, regardless of any claims, historical or cultural. And its not especially coherent as to why reclaiming alot of these relatively minor countries would be worth the trouble. I mean hey, I might be missing out on something going on in Estonia by god, but I doubt its worth it enough to acquire it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Russia has legitimate claims on most of these small countries some of which have been part of Russia for centuries. Furthermore she is relative to everyone around her a superpower. When you create a situation like this which is an almost exact analog of that existing in Eastern Europe and he Balkans in the interwar years it is inherently unstable.&#8221;</p>
<p>Around her doesn&#8217;t really matter, except for geo-political chicanery where international relations is nothing more than a game of Risk writ large, a point that Putin keeps insisting on driving home by playing games, provoked or unprovoked, with countries around its periphery that end up with its economy and foreign exchange getting pummeled. It reminds of a prominent jihadist who pointed out that the logic of al-Qaeda vis a vis &#8220;getting back&#8221; at America was horribly me myopic; for the act of bombing 3000, they&#8217;ve managed to get millions more killed and left a whole region in tatters.</p>
<p>In many of the same ways that America&#8217;s own foreign dalliances end up costing us significantly more than we ever wanted, so is it with Russia&#8217;s, regardless of any claims, historical or cultural. And its not especially coherent as to why reclaiming alot of these relatively minor countries would be worth the trouble. I mean hey, I might be missing out on something going on in Estonia by god, but I doubt its worth it enough to acquire it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-31600</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31600</guid>
		<description>Yes, that was a parody.  I was a little thrown by the cost-benefit-analysis approach to assessing Soviet Communism, but decided that actually debating it head-on would be too exhausting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that was a parody.  I was a little thrown by the cost-benefit-analysis approach to assessing Soviet Communism, but decided that actually debating it head-on would be too exhausting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottovbvs</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-2/#comment-31598</link>
		<dc:creator>ottovbvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31598</guid>
		<description>jetan, on April 21st, 2009 at 6:23 pm Said:
&quot;Actually, you make the Soviets sound kind of pastoral and idyllic&quot;

......Certainly half the rural transport of goods seemed to be horse drawn......I&#039;m afraid I don&#039;t have your talent.....The tractor factory was hilarious....big but hilarious......it really was the old Russian joke &quot;They pretend to pay us, we pretend to work&quot; in reality.....And yet these were the guys who broke the Wehrmacht so go figure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jetan, on April 21st, 2009 at 6:23 pm Said:<br />
&#8220;Actually, you make the Soviets sound kind of pastoral and idyllic&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;Certainly half the rural transport of goods seemed to be horse drawn&#8230;&#8230;I&#8217;m afraid I don&#8217;t have your talent&#8230;..The tractor factory was hilarious&#8230;.big but hilarious&#8230;&#8230;it really was the old Russian joke &#8220;They pretend to pay us, we pretend to work&#8221; in reality&#8230;..And yet these were the guys who broke the Wehrmacht so go figure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyrus</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-31597</link>
		<dc:creator>cyrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31597</guid>
		<description>@Charlie.

I stand in awe of your parodic gift.  Bravo, sir!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Charlie.</p>
<p>I stand in awe of your parodic gift.  Bravo, sir!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jetan</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-31595</link>
		<dc:creator>jetan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31595</guid>
		<description>@ottovbvs

Actually, you make the Soviets sound kind of pastoral and idyllic. But, then, I&#039;ve always been good at looking past squalor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ottovbvs</p>
<p>Actually, you make the Soviets sound kind of pastoral and idyllic. But, then, I&#8217;ve always been good at looking past squalor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jetan</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-31594</link>
		<dc:creator>jetan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31594</guid>
		<description>@Charlie-


I hope I am correct in crediting you with a very dry wit and an ironic sensibility 

Lines like &quot;just imagine what might have been achieved without foreign interference.&quot; and a Germany &quot;where civil unrest was all but unheard of &quot; don&#039;t grow on trees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Charlie-</p>
<p>I hope I am correct in crediting you with a very dry wit and an ironic sensibility </p>
<p>Lines like &#8220;just imagine what might have been achieved without foreign interference.&#8221; and a Germany &#8220;where civil unrest was all but unheard of &#8221; don&#8217;t grow on trees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottovbvs</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/04/19/dictatorships-and-no-intellectual-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-31593</link>
		<dc:creator>ottovbvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=9266#comment-31593</guid>
		<description>&quot;jetan, on April 21st, 2009 at 3:07 pm Said: 
Iâ€™m sorry this topic petered out so soon. I had a couple of kind words to say about the Spanish Inquisition and The Childrenâ€™s Crusade.&quot;

....I also wanted to say word or two in favor of ducking stools, pricking for the kings evil, the black hundreds and the holy office. 

I actually visited the Soviet Union a few times in the late seventies and early eighties. I knew it was doomed when I visited a giant tractor factory built for them by the Italians and observed women in their break pealing potatoes by the assembly line; a couple having sex in a curtained off welding area; and piles of engines stacked directly on top of each other and not in stillages. All true. There were other signs too. If you went 25 miles outside a major city it was like Tsarist Russia. The CIA couldn&#039;t have made the trip but then the truth might have affected the budgets back home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;jetan, on April 21st, 2009 at 3:07 pm Said:<br />
Iâ€™m sorry this topic petered out so soon. I had a couple of kind words to say about the Spanish Inquisition and The Childrenâ€™s Crusade.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;.I also wanted to say word or two in favor of ducking stools, pricking for the kings evil, the black hundreds and the holy office. </p>
<p>I actually visited the Soviet Union a few times in the late seventies and early eighties. I knew it was doomed when I visited a giant tractor factory built for them by the Italians and observed women in their break pealing potatoes by the assembly line; a couple having sex in a curtained off welding area; and piles of engines stacked directly on top of each other and not in stillages. All true. There were other signs too. If you went 25 miles outside a major city it was like Tsarist Russia. The CIA couldn&#8217;t have made the trip but then the truth might have affected the budgets back home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

