<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Weakness Of Economic Conservatism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/02/26/the-weakness-of-economic-conservatism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/02/26/the-weakness-of-economic-conservatism/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-weakness-of-economic-conservatism</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottovbvs</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/02/26/the-weakness-of-economic-conservatism/comment-page-1/#comment-30440</link>
		<dc:creator>ottovbvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=8544#comment-30440</guid>
		<description>&quot; It isnâ€™t just that conservatives rally around symbolic folk heroes, but that they do so in defense of a policy critique that isnâ€™t really valid.&quot;

Face it Daniel, the whole conservative/Republican platform is riddled with policy critiques that aren&#039;t valid. They are based on either social myths that have been invented or a least elevated to prominence to energize a particular group, or economic theories that are demonstrably flawed like supply side. The cupboard is bare. I could go through a list of policy propositions that basically don&#039;t command majority support and even on a few like immigration reform where opinion is more equally divided the &quot;conservative&quot; solution isn&#039;t remotely practical. All this is the result of 30 years of relentless polarization as a conservative strategy. The effect has been to harden the opinions of a declining demographic behind a bunch of propositions that are electoral poison. Take global warming. The vast majority of the country can see this is a problem, but conservatives have been able to create a minority narrative that it&#039;s all a hysterical invention by democrats. The funding for this narrative came from energy companies who were looking to protect their interests rather as the tobacco companies did for forty years over cancer. In the process conservatism and its political arm the GOP has essentially become a prisoner of this minority supported narrative. One of it&#039;s notable consequences has been the annihilation of Republican support amongst the 18-30 group where Democrats now outnumber Republicans two to one with electoral consequences that are going to be felt for 50 years. Frankly I don&#039;t see a way out of this canyon for conservatives other than the total failure of the Obama administration which isn&#039;t going to happen however much conservatives may hope for it. This hope which is so contrary the national interest is a measure of just how parlous is the condition of conservatism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; It isnâ€™t just that conservatives rally around symbolic folk heroes, but that they do so in defense of a policy critique that isnâ€™t really valid.&#8221;</p>
<p>Face it Daniel, the whole conservative/Republican platform is riddled with policy critiques that aren&#8217;t valid. They are based on either social myths that have been invented or a least elevated to prominence to energize a particular group, or economic theories that are demonstrably flawed like supply side. The cupboard is bare. I could go through a list of policy propositions that basically don&#8217;t command majority support and even on a few like immigration reform where opinion is more equally divided the &#8220;conservative&#8221; solution isn&#8217;t remotely practical. All this is the result of 30 years of relentless polarization as a conservative strategy. The effect has been to harden the opinions of a declining demographic behind a bunch of propositions that are electoral poison. Take global warming. The vast majority of the country can see this is a problem, but conservatives have been able to create a minority narrative that it&#8217;s all a hysterical invention by democrats. The funding for this narrative came from energy companies who were looking to protect their interests rather as the tobacco companies did for forty years over cancer. In the process conservatism and its political arm the GOP has essentially become a prisoner of this minority supported narrative. One of it&#8217;s notable consequences has been the annihilation of Republican support amongst the 18-30 group where Democrats now outnumber Republicans two to one with electoral consequences that are going to be felt for 50 years. Frankly I don&#8217;t see a way out of this canyon for conservatives other than the total failure of the Obama administration which isn&#8217;t going to happen however much conservatives may hope for it. This hope which is so contrary the national interest is a measure of just how parlous is the condition of conservatism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WRW</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/02/26/the-weakness-of-economic-conservatism/comment-page-1/#comment-30416</link>
		<dc:creator>WRW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=8544#comment-30416</guid>
		<description>This is one of the most succinct and devastating critiques of the GOP I&#039;ve read this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the most succinct and devastating critiques of the GOP I&#8217;ve read this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.Z. Forrest</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/02/26/the-weakness-of-economic-conservatism/comment-page-1/#comment-30409</link>
		<dc:creator>M.Z. Forrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=8544#comment-30409</guid>
		<description>I think the message ran out of real estate.  Speaking for myself, the doom and gloom that didn&#039;t materialize during the Clinton years and then waiting for the morning that would never come during the Bush years made me at least re-examine my assumptions.  Also, I think most Americans can understand and accept some disparity in incomes, but $1 mil in income and bonuses often exceeding 2 or 3 times the every man&#039;s income put a real dent in the solidarity the GOP tried to establish amongst its coalition at all income levels.  It was embarassing watching Obama and McCain last fall attempt to define middle class.  Even Obama defining at $250K/yr income seemed to leave a lot of people worried about the poor only making $300K or whatever.  Regardless, past a certain point, reasonable people say it is impossible to &#039;earn&#039; a certain amount of income.  To parallel your point, there are not an insignificant number of GOP voters receiving the EITC and there are many more getting the refundable portion of the child tax credit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the message ran out of real estate.  Speaking for myself, the doom and gloom that didn&#8217;t materialize during the Clinton years and then waiting for the morning that would never come during the Bush years made me at least re-examine my assumptions.  Also, I think most Americans can understand and accept some disparity in incomes, but $1 mil in income and bonuses often exceeding 2 or 3 times the every man&#8217;s income put a real dent in the solidarity the GOP tried to establish amongst its coalition at all income levels.  It was embarassing watching Obama and McCain last fall attempt to define middle class.  Even Obama defining at $250K/yr income seemed to leave a lot of people worried about the poor only making $300K or whatever.  Regardless, past a certain point, reasonable people say it is impossible to &#8216;earn&#8217; a certain amount of income.  To parallel your point, there are not an insignificant number of GOP voters receiving the EITC and there are many more getting the refundable portion of the child tax credit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

