<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full Of Passionate Intensity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/01/19/full-of-passionate-intensity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/01/19/full-of-passionate-intensity/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=full-of-passionate-intensity</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pacific moderate</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2009/01/19/full-of-passionate-intensity/comment-page-1/#comment-29840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pacific moderate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=8142#comment-29840</guid>
		<description>There does seem to have been a change in thinking among some of these commentators on this subject since, say, Bill Clinton&#039;s second term.

&quot;If he did lie under oath...regardless of why he did this...then that is exactly why he should not be pardoned. The reliability of witness testimony under oath is essential to the proper functioning of the system, and cooperation with investigators is an equally important part, and it is unacceptable to undermine this.&quot; Wasn&#039;t that the crux of the impeachment case against President Clinton?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There does seem to have been a change in thinking among some of these commentators on this subject since, say, Bill Clinton&#8217;s second term.</p>
<p>&#8220;If he did lie under oath&#8230;regardless of why he did this&#8230;then that is exactly why he should not be pardoned. The reliability of witness testimony under oath is essential to the proper functioning of the system, and cooperation with investigators is an equally important part, and it is unacceptable to undermine this.&#8221; Wasn&#8217;t that the crux of the impeachment case against President Clinton?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

