<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seeing Into The Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/12/09/seeing-into-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/12/09/seeing-into-the-future/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=seeing-into-the-future</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedschan</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/12/09/seeing-into-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-21002</link>
		<dc:creator>tedschan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7930#comment-21002</guid>
		<description>Grumpy Old Man, did you attempt to persuade Kiddo to go to any schools in particular?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grumpy Old Man, did you attempt to persuade Kiddo to go to any schools in particular?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy Old Man</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/12/09/seeing-into-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-20836</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpy Old Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7930#comment-20836</guid>
		<description>Went on a college tour with Kiddo in Nov. Colleges seem to have oceans of exercise machinery, among other luxuries. 

Where are the ink-stained scriveners of yesteryear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Went on a college tour with Kiddo in Nov. Colleges seem to have oceans of exercise machinery, among other luxuries. </p>
<p>Where are the ink-stained scriveners of yesteryear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shecky</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/12/09/seeing-into-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-20835</link>
		<dc:creator>shecky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7930#comment-20835</guid>
		<description>I like how Cao&#039;s &quot;law office became a hub for &lt;i&gt;community organizing&lt;/i&gt; and assistance to hurricane victims.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how Cao&#8217;s &#8220;law office became a hub for <i>community organizing</i> and assistance to hurricane victims.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedschan</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/12/09/seeing-into-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-20823</link>
		<dc:creator>tedschan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7930#comment-20823</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m waiting for the higher ed bubble to burst...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for the higher ed bubble to burst&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funyun</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/12/09/seeing-into-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-20820</link>
		<dc:creator>funyun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7930#comment-20820</guid>
		<description>Money spent on turning college into the new HS degree is wasted money and will drives prices even higher than such policies have already done.  

College is more expensive because of student loan programs, where nobody is spending their own money and also due to entitlement mentalities among many incoming students for expensive external perks.

College would be more, not less accessible if it was not awash in quasi-free loan money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money spent on turning college into the new HS degree is wasted money and will drives prices even higher than such policies have already done.  </p>
<p>College is more expensive because of student loan programs, where nobody is spending their own money and also due to entitlement mentalities among many incoming students for expensive external perks.</p>
<p>College would be more, not less accessible if it was not awash in quasi-free loan money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake - butnottheone</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/12/09/seeing-into-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-20786</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake - butnottheone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7930#comment-20786</guid>
		<description>Kosovo was not a good thing.  It was far from a disaster.  I don&#039;t know what kind of intervention was required, if any.

Do you have a mental list of things you would like to see done? At least one things to be done is on my list, too - get out of Iraq. Hopefully completely. I think we share that.

What else might we share, given that I think we should have universal health care and way more money spent in post-secondary education? Are you for weaning ourselves off of oil, at least mostly? What about the environment? Are you for it or agin it? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kosovo was not a good thing.  It was far from a disaster.  I don&#8217;t know what kind of intervention was required, if any.</p>
<p>Do you have a mental list of things you would like to see done? At least one things to be done is on my list, too &#8211; get out of Iraq. Hopefully completely. I think we share that.</p>
<p>What else might we share, given that I think we should have universal health care and way more money spent in post-secondary education? Are you for weaning ourselves off of oil, at least mostly? What about the environment? Are you for it or agin it? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Larison</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/12/09/seeing-into-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-20778</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Larison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7930#comment-20778</guid>
		<description>They haven&#039;t had control of the executive for a while.  Last time they had it, they had more than enough needless wars and deployments overseas.  People tend to forget about Kosovo because it didn&#039;t result in that much calamity and death, but it was still wrong, illegal and unnecessary.

On policy, the Democrats are less likely to do most of the things I would like to see done, and they are more likely to do far more things that I think shouldn&#039;t be done.  So, there is less potential there for the sort of governing that I would like to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They haven&#8217;t had control of the executive for a while.  Last time they had it, they had more than enough needless wars and deployments overseas.  People tend to forget about Kosovo because it didn&#8217;t result in that much calamity and death, but it was still wrong, illegal and unnecessary.</p>
<p>On policy, the Democrats are less likely to do most of the things I would like to see done, and they are more likely to do far more things that I think shouldn&#8217;t be done.  So, there is less potential there for the sort of governing that I would like to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake - butnottheone</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/12/09/seeing-into-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-20777</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake - butnottheone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7930#comment-20777</guid>
		<description>Well, your last point is certainly true.  And voting against incumbents is almost always a safe bet, at least if they&#039;ve been incumbent long enough.

But libertarianism and Ron Paul don&#039;t have that much to offer either. Though he might be better than anything the Republicans have put up in the last 40 years.

We live in a universe that requires checks and balances, and when we the people don&#039;t provide them, the meta rule of consequences eventually does. Libertarianism is another vision of utopia, unachievable with real human beings.

You see less potential in Democrats?  Potential for what, Daniel? Potential for disaster? Even the criminals on the Democratic side don&#039;t start needless wars. At least so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, your last point is certainly true.  And voting against incumbents is almost always a safe bet, at least if they&#8217;ve been incumbent long enough.</p>
<p>But libertarianism and Ron Paul don&#8217;t have that much to offer either. Though he might be better than anything the Republicans have put up in the last 40 years.</p>
<p>We live in a universe that requires checks and balances, and when we the people don&#8217;t provide them, the meta rule of consequences eventually does. Libertarianism is another vision of utopia, unachievable with real human beings.</p>
<p>You see less potential in Democrats?  Potential for what, Daniel? Potential for disaster? Even the criminals on the Democratic side don&#8217;t start needless wars. At least so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Larison</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/12/09/seeing-into-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-20776</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Larison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7930#comment-20776</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t necessarily support Republicans.  It depends on the race in question.  I haven&#039;t supported many Republicans in the last eight years, and most of those I have supported have been at the state level because of the stranglehold the Dems have on New Mexico politics.  On the whole, I vote against the incumbent party whenever I can, or at least I don&#039;t vote for it.  It&#039;s true that I have very little sympathy for a lot of what the GOP considers its priorities these days, but I don&#039;t see anyone comparable to Ron Paul on the Democratic side, either.  One reason I don&#039;t consider the Democrats is that I see even less potential there.  

As for making my views more widely held, I doubt this would happen in either of the major parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t necessarily support Republicans.  It depends on the race in question.  I haven&#8217;t supported many Republicans in the last eight years, and most of those I have supported have been at the state level because of the stranglehold the Dems have on New Mexico politics.  On the whole, I vote against the incumbent party whenever I can, or at least I don&#8217;t vote for it.  It&#8217;s true that I have very little sympathy for a lot of what the GOP considers its priorities these days, but I don&#8217;t see anyone comparable to Ron Paul on the Democratic side, either.  One reason I don&#8217;t consider the Democrats is that I see even less potential there.  </p>
<p>As for making my views more widely held, I doubt this would happen in either of the major parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake - butnottheone</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/12/09/seeing-into-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-20774</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake - butnottheone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7930#comment-20774</guid>
		<description>Daniel, why do you support Republicans? You writings say to me that you are not aligned with anything the party actually stands for, at least currently. The forseeable future of the Republican party doesn&#039;t look any better, either. Why do you not consider the Democratic party and work to make your views more widely held?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, why do you support Republicans? You writings say to me that you are not aligned with anything the party actually stands for, at least currently. The forseeable future of the Republican party doesn&#8217;t look any better, either. Why do you not consider the Democratic party and work to make your views more widely held?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

