<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Structural Flaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/11/13/structural-flaw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/11/13/structural-flaw/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=structural-flaw</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My First Foray into Federalism &#171; Upturned Earth &#124;&#124; John Schwenkler</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/11/13/structural-flaw/comment-page-1/#comment-18839</link>
		<dc:creator>My First Foray into Federalism &#171; Upturned Earth &#124;&#124; John Schwenkler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7598#comment-18839</guid>
		<description>[...] to Daniel, who submits that stiff resistance from Congress and the Courts (for neither of which Mr. Larison [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Daniel, who submits that stiff resistance from Congress and the Courts (for neither of which Mr. Larison [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rawshark</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/11/13/structural-flaw/comment-page-1/#comment-18422</link>
		<dc:creator>rawshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7598#comment-18422</guid>
		<description>I normally avoid political books but this Limits Of Power sounds really good.

Is Alice In Wonderland a political book? I&#039;m reading it now (never read it as a kid) and it seems almost like the inspiration for everything Orwell wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I normally avoid political books but this Limits Of Power sounds really good.</p>
<p>Is Alice In Wonderland a political book? I&#8217;m reading it now (never read it as a kid) and it seems almost like the inspiration for everything Orwell wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama and the War-Time Executive &#171; Upturned Earth &#124;&#124; John Schwenkler</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/11/13/structural-flaw/comment-page-1/#comment-18268</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama and the War-Time Executive &#171; Upturned Earth &#124;&#124; John Schwenkler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7598#comment-18268</guid>
		<description>[...] writes: â€œThe only thing that would prevent expansion of executive power [in a time of crisis such as we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] writes: â€œThe only thing that would prevent expansion of executive power [in a time of crisis such as we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conradg</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/11/13/structural-flaw/comment-page-1/#comment-18263</link>
		<dc:creator>conradg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7598#comment-18263</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re right that the temptation for Obama will be great, because there is very little standing in his way other than his own sense of conscience. Fortunately, he&#039;s the kind of guy who appears to have a much great sense of conscience than either Bush or Clinton, but no man is perfect. 

The problem here is that Congress, which was originally conceived of as a major check on the executive, has almost wilted into either a cheerleading squad, or at best an intellectual debate club with no real force behind it. This wasn&#039;t always the case. In the old days, when Congress was run by ruthlessly corrupt leaders like Johnson, Rayburn, etc., the Congress had considerable spine and power. Somehow, it simply abandoned that as &quot;too undemocratic&quot;. But there&#039;s something to be said for the old political machines, they at least kept people in line, even the leaders. Perhaps we could attribute the end of this to Vietnam, which so splintered politics as to make party loyalty untenable for many, and post-watergate reforms, which did away with political bosses and their machines. Obama has to find a new way to tether the executive to real popular power, because I don&#039;t see congress being the vehicle for that. It will be interesting to see how his internet populist grass roots movement can figure into this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right that the temptation for Obama will be great, because there is very little standing in his way other than his own sense of conscience. Fortunately, he&#8217;s the kind of guy who appears to have a much great sense of conscience than either Bush or Clinton, but no man is perfect. </p>
<p>The problem here is that Congress, which was originally conceived of as a major check on the executive, has almost wilted into either a cheerleading squad, or at best an intellectual debate club with no real force behind it. This wasn&#8217;t always the case. In the old days, when Congress was run by ruthlessly corrupt leaders like Johnson, Rayburn, etc., the Congress had considerable spine and power. Somehow, it simply abandoned that as &#8220;too undemocratic&#8221;. But there&#8217;s something to be said for the old political machines, they at least kept people in line, even the leaders. Perhaps we could attribute the end of this to Vietnam, which so splintered politics as to make party loyalty untenable for many, and post-watergate reforms, which did away with political bosses and their machines. Obama has to find a new way to tether the executive to real popular power, because I don&#8217;t see congress being the vehicle for that. It will be interesting to see how his internet populist grass roots movement can figure into this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

