<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MD-01</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/11/05/md-01/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/11/05/md-01/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=md-01</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Longo</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/11/05/md-01/comment-page-1/#comment-17733</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Longo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/11/05/md-01/#comment-17733</guid>
		<description>&quot;Will the Ds will hold the Eastern Shore in â€˜10 w/o a Presidential race, George Bush, etc.; in other words will they hold this seat in a neutral year? I doubt it; this is a reliably Republican area. Which means CFG will have gotten rid of a moderate for a likely more fiscally conservative Congressman with a two-year Democratic interlude.&quot;

Yeah. And this approach has worked really well in places like New England or former &quot;swing&quot; districts like Macomb County, MI (birthplace of the Reagan Democrats) and Montgomery County, PA (suburban Philadelphia), right?

Another reliably Republican district has fallen in Maryland. Wayne Gilchrist may have been a moderate, but he still had the &quot;R&quot; after his name. He served his constituents reliably for two decades. He still voted with the party more than 60% of the time.  Having survived the widespread Republican defeat in 2006 without much difficulty, Gilchrist probably would have done a better job against a relative newcomer like Frank Kratovil than that schmuck Andy Harris, who was too conservative for Maryland&#039;s 1st district. The Eastern Shore ain&#039;t exactly Dogpatch, you know...

I don&#039;t know about you, Young Geezer, but I&#039;d rather have 60% of a loaf than no loaf at all. Looking to 2010 does us no good at this point. The seat is gone. Two years is a political eternity.

Youth truly is wasted on the young. Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Will the Ds will hold the Eastern Shore in â€˜10 w/o a Presidential race, George Bush, etc.; in other words will they hold this seat in a neutral year? I doubt it; this is a reliably Republican area. Which means CFG will have gotten rid of a moderate for a likely more fiscally conservative Congressman with a two-year Democratic interlude.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah. And this approach has worked really well in places like New England or former &#8220;swing&#8221; districts like Macomb County, MI (birthplace of the Reagan Democrats) and Montgomery County, PA (suburban Philadelphia), right?</p>
<p>Another reliably Republican district has fallen in Maryland. Wayne Gilchrist may have been a moderate, but he still had the &#8220;R&#8221; after his name. He served his constituents reliably for two decades. He still voted with the party more than 60% of the time.  Having survived the widespread Republican defeat in 2006 without much difficulty, Gilchrist probably would have done a better job against a relative newcomer like Frank Kratovil than that schmuck Andy Harris, who was too conservative for Maryland&#8217;s 1st district. The Eastern Shore ain&#8217;t exactly Dogpatch, you know&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, Young Geezer, but I&#8217;d rather have 60% of a loaf than no loaf at all. Looking to 2010 does us no good at this point. The seat is gone. Two years is a political eternity.</p>
<p>Youth truly is wasted on the young. Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Young Geezer</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/11/05/md-01/comment-page-1/#comment-17394</link>
		<dc:creator>Young Geezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/11/05/md-01/#comment-17394</guid>
		<description>&quot;...in recent elections the only thing that the Club for Growth seems to be very good at growing is the Democratic majority in Congress&quot;

Will the Ds will hold the Eastern Shore in &#039;10 w/o a Presidential race, George Bush, etc.; in other words will they hold this seat in a neutral year?  I doubt it; this is a reliably Republican area.  Which means CFG will have gotten rid of a moderate for a likely more fiscally conservative Congressman with a two-year Democratic interlude.  This isn&#039;t like Northern VA or something, where there has been a demographic shift; these folks are just disgruntled.

CFG took out Gilchrest and Schwarz in MI, and now the Democrats have two more seats; but to assume the Eastern Shore or south central rural Michigan won&#039;t return to their normal patterns in a year that isn&#039;t so stacked toward the Democrats is odd; these are borrowed seats.  And if the GOPer who replaces these folks is more fiscally conservative than Schwarz or Gilchrest, respectively, then the CFG would have done it&#039;s job.  Sure, it took a few cycles, but that&#039;s a risk you take running primaries against incumbents...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;in recent elections the only thing that the Club for Growth seems to be very good at growing is the Democratic majority in Congress&#8221;</p>
<p>Will the Ds will hold the Eastern Shore in &#8217;10 w/o a Presidential race, George Bush, etc.; in other words will they hold this seat in a neutral year?  I doubt it; this is a reliably Republican area.  Which means CFG will have gotten rid of a moderate for a likely more fiscally conservative Congressman with a two-year Democratic interlude.  This isn&#8217;t like Northern VA or something, where there has been a demographic shift; these folks are just disgruntled.</p>
<p>CFG took out Gilchrest and Schwarz in MI, and now the Democrats have two more seats; but to assume the Eastern Shore or south central rural Michigan won&#8217;t return to their normal patterns in a year that isn&#8217;t so stacked toward the Democrats is odd; these are borrowed seats.  And if the GOPer who replaces these folks is more fiscally conservative than Schwarz or Gilchrest, respectively, then the CFG would have done it&#8217;s job.  Sure, it took a few cycles, but that&#8217;s a risk you take running primaries against incumbents&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balloon Juice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Billy Madison Party</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/11/05/md-01/comment-page-1/#comment-17316</link>
		<dc:creator>Balloon Juice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Billy Madison Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/11/05/md-01/#comment-17316</guid>
		<description>[...] They never learn: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They never learn: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bayesian</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/11/05/md-01/comment-page-1/#comment-17301</link>
		<dc:creator>bayesian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/11/05/md-01/#comment-17301</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m on the other coast, but I would happily vote Republican for Congress (I suspect I must have voted R for Congress at some time before, probably when I lived in NorCal, but not since I&#039;ve been in the district of B-1 Bob Dornan then Dana Rohrbacher) if I could have had Wayne Gilchrest on my ballot.  I kind of wish he&#039;d run as an independent &quot;Gilchrest for the Eastern Shore&quot; (note the order).

Eyeballing the vote counts by county, it looks like most of MD-1 went for McCain by a decent margin (maybe 55-60% overall).

Walter B. Jones, who beat off his primary challenge, rolled over his Democractic opponent, OTOH, so there is perhaps some hope for repentant warmongers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m on the other coast, but I would happily vote Republican for Congress (I suspect I must have voted R for Congress at some time before, probably when I lived in NorCal, but not since I&#8217;ve been in the district of B-1 Bob Dornan then Dana Rohrbacher) if I could have had Wayne Gilchrest on my ballot.  I kind of wish he&#8217;d run as an independent &#8220;Gilchrest for the Eastern Shore&#8221; (note the order).</p>
<p>Eyeballing the vote counts by county, it looks like most of MD-1 went for McCain by a decent margin (maybe 55-60% overall).</p>
<p>Walter B. Jones, who beat off his primary challenge, rolled over his Democractic opponent, OTOH, so there is perhaps some hope for repentant warmongers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

