<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palin And Reagan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/10/16/palin-and-reagan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/10/16/palin-and-reagan/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=palin-and-reagan</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 24AheadDotCom</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/10/16/palin-and-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-15577</link>
		<dc:creator>24AheadDotCom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/16/palin-and-reagan/#comment-15577</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve already posted similar things here in the past, but let&#039;s boil down the choices:

* BHO plus a Dem Congress plus BHO&#039;s far-left/Chicago buddies (including mob links) plus an MSM victorious after having helped BHO win. The only opposition would come from the largely apathetic public, plus some House members plus some media sources. BHO will be able to do basically anything he wants. And, when he does something stupid, the MSM will do then what they&#039;re doing now: cover up for him. BHO will move to shut down opponents, such as those who spread &quot;hate&quot; (according to his definition).

* McCain/Palin plus Dem Congress plus a defeated, humiliated MSM which failed to get the results they wanted. McCain/Palin will have plenty of advisors who&#039;ll fill in the gaps in the latter&#039;s knowledge, and if they try something Bush-like the Dems will fight against them. Not only that, but some in the GOP will fight against them; there is no &quot;McCain mania&quot; as there was &quot;Bush mania&quot;. One of the things to watch out for in that case is immigration &quot;reform&quot;, but regular people mobilized against that before and will mobilize against it again.

Overall, the far, far safer choice is McCain, and if anyone realizes how dangerous BHO winning would be for the U.S. help me defeat him. Please send emails to every blogger and anti-Obama pundit you can think of urging them to back &lt;a href=&quot;http://24ahead.com/blog/archives/008071.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this plan&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve already posted similar things here in the past, but let&#8217;s boil down the choices:</p>
<p>* BHO plus a Dem Congress plus BHO&#8217;s far-left/Chicago buddies (including mob links) plus an MSM victorious after having helped BHO win. The only opposition would come from the largely apathetic public, plus some House members plus some media sources. BHO will be able to do basically anything he wants. And, when he does something stupid, the MSM will do then what they&#8217;re doing now: cover up for him. BHO will move to shut down opponents, such as those who spread &#8220;hate&#8221; (according to his definition).</p>
<p>* McCain/Palin plus Dem Congress plus a defeated, humiliated MSM which failed to get the results they wanted. McCain/Palin will have plenty of advisors who&#8217;ll fill in the gaps in the latter&#8217;s knowledge, and if they try something Bush-like the Dems will fight against them. Not only that, but some in the GOP will fight against them; there is no &#8220;McCain mania&#8221; as there was &#8220;Bush mania&#8221;. One of the things to watch out for in that case is immigration &#8220;reform&#8221;, but regular people mobilized against that before and will mobilize against it again.</p>
<p>Overall, the far, far safer choice is McCain, and if anyone realizes how dangerous BHO winning would be for the U.S. help me defeat him. Please send emails to every blogger and anti-Obama pundit you can think of urging them to back <a href="http://24ahead.com/blog/archives/008071.html" rel="nofollow">this plan</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turbulence</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/10/16/palin-and-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-15570</link>
		<dc:creator>Turbulence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/16/palin-and-reagan/#comment-15570</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I donâ€™t know how one determines sheâ€™s â€œincurious.â€&lt;/i&gt;

This is a governor of a state in a nation that has been fighting a war in Afghanistan for the last 6 years and has not yet figured out that the US military really does occasionally bomb civilians (even if only by accident). We&#039;re not talking about knowing the detailed history of various tribes in Waziristan; we&#039;re talking about knowing the most basic facts of modern warfare, namely the notion that innocent people die even under the best of circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I donâ€™t know how one determines sheâ€™s â€œincurious.â€</i></p>
<p>This is a governor of a state in a nation that has been fighting a war in Afghanistan for the last 6 years and has not yet figured out that the US military really does occasionally bomb civilians (even if only by accident). We&#8217;re not talking about knowing the detailed history of various tribes in Waziristan; we&#8217;re talking about knowing the most basic facts of modern warfare, namely the notion that innocent people die even under the best of circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy Old Man</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/10/16/palin-and-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-15552</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpy Old Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/16/palin-and-reagan/#comment-15552</guid>
		<description>Palin no doubt has lacunae, if not empty canyons, in her knowledge, say of Waziristan, but I don&#039;t know how one determines she&#039;s &quot;incurious.&quot; Although the race is tightening, it&#039;s unlikely we&#039;ll have a chance to see if she grows in office.

As for W, no doubt you&#039;re right--he&#039;s not as stupid as he pretends to be. I, however, can&#039;t get past his curious habits of speech, such as his lateralized /s/ and his robotic-folksy delivery. Obama may well talk nonsense and indulge in folly, but at least he speaks decent English and has a skillful delivery.

Let&#039;s hope that if BHO wins, he lives out his term. If I were forced to listen regularly to the corner-tavern babble of Slow Joe Biden, I might pull an Elvis and shoot the TV. You betcha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin no doubt has lacunae, if not empty canyons, in her knowledge, say of Waziristan, but I don&#8217;t know how one determines she&#8217;s &#8220;incurious.&#8221; Although the race is tightening, it&#8217;s unlikely we&#8217;ll have a chance to see if she grows in office.</p>
<p>As for W, no doubt you&#8217;re right&#8211;he&#8217;s not as stupid as he pretends to be. I, however, can&#8217;t get past his curious habits of speech, such as his lateralized /s/ and his robotic-folksy delivery. Obama may well talk nonsense and indulge in folly, but at least he speaks decent English and has a skillful delivery.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope that if BHO wins, he lives out his term. If I were forced to listen regularly to the corner-tavern babble of Slow Joe Biden, I might pull an Elvis and shoot the TV. You betcha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyx</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/10/16/palin-and-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-15544</link>
		<dc:creator>nyx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/16/palin-and-reagan/#comment-15544</guid>
		<description>Palin is no Reagan. Perhaps a Bush but definitely no Reagan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin is no Reagan. Perhaps a Bush but definitely no Reagan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indya</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/10/16/palin-and-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-15537</link>
		<dc:creator>Indya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/16/palin-and-reagan/#comment-15537</guid>
		<description>It is an insult to Ronald Reagan to mentioned in the same breath as Sarah Palin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is an insult to Ronald Reagan to mentioned in the same breath as Sarah Palin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

