<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Not &#8220;Gotcha,&#8221; It&#8217;s A Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/10/02/its-not-gotcha-its-a-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/10/02/its-not-gotcha-its-a-question/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=its-not-gotcha-its-a-question</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/10/02/its-not-gotcha-its-a-question/comment-page-1/#comment-14731</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/02/its-not-gotcha-its-a-question/#comment-14731</guid>
		<description>AMEN. One can argue that the media is ideologically biased (though the strict  &lt;i&gt;partisan&lt;/i&gt; bias that has become orthodoxy on the right does not bear out in studies of the issue), but using &quot;the media is biased&quot; as the rebuttal to an uncomfortable question is just whining, pure and simple. 

If a candidate wants to make an impression, let him/her just answer the damn question, and answer it well. Even if it&#039;s loaded or &quot;gotcha&quot; or whatever, griping about it after the fact just makes the interviewee look like a schoolgirl. (Pardon the pun.) A superior candidate â€” especially on a ticket whose head continually says his opponent &quot;doesn&#039;t understand&quot; this or that â€” should be able to handle it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMEN. One can argue that the media is ideologically biased (though the strict  <i>partisan</i> bias that has become orthodoxy on the right does not bear out in studies of the issue), but using &#8220;the media is biased&#8221; as the rebuttal to an uncomfortable question is just whining, pure and simple. </p>
<p>If a candidate wants to make an impression, let him/her just answer the damn question, and answer it well. Even if it&#8217;s loaded or &#8220;gotcha&#8221; or whatever, griping about it after the fact just makes the interviewee look like a schoolgirl. (Pardon the pun.) A superior candidate â€” especially on a ticket whose head continually says his opponent &#8220;doesn&#8217;t understand&#8221; this or that â€” should be able to handle it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

