<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secluding Palin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/09/23/secluding-palin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/09/23/secluding-palin/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=secluding-palin</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy Old Man</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/09/23/secluding-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-15290</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpy Old Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/23/secluding-palin/#comment-15290</guid>
		<description>In fact, there is such a thing as corporate liberalism. It&#039;s very strong in both parties, the foundations, etc. 

Clinton&#039; Sec. Treas., Rubin, is an exemplar of same. Much more emphasis on social and cultural liberalism, much less on breadbasket issues that the traditional Dems. focused on. Obama&#039;s a pretty good example.

So was Nelson Rockefeller and the old Ripon Society wing of the GOP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, there is such a thing as corporate liberalism. It&#8217;s very strong in both parties, the foundations, etc. </p>
<p>Clinton&#8217; Sec. Treas., Rubin, is an exemplar of same. Much more emphasis on social and cultural liberalism, much less on breadbasket issues that the traditional Dems. focused on. Obama&#8217;s a pretty good example.</p>
<p>So was Nelson Rockefeller and the old Ripon Society wing of the GOP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Rayborn</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/09/23/secluding-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-15289</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Rayborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/23/secluding-palin/#comment-15289</guid>
		<description>I just love the term &quot;liberal media&quot;, considering that same &quot;liberal media&quot; is owned by six major corporations. Talk about put a spin on truth, all you have to do when something comes out that you don&#039;t like is throw mud at the source, and the term &#039;liberal&#039; slants it in your favor just as &quot;conservative&quot; will slant it the oposite way for some. We should really call it corporate &quot;advertising news&quot;. The ONLY liberal media out there are the non-profits and some internet media sources. Anything seen or heard on the major media sources is anything but &#039;liberal&quot; or for that matter, complete truth. Read any conservative or for that matter, liberal news outlets and you will see the same issue arise. That is that the corporate lobbyists buy our politicians, regardless or their party. Lets face the facts. The corporations that profit from war, push us into war based on how the skew the news, and both parties follow like liitle hungry puppies, except they want their share of the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just love the term &#8220;liberal media&#8221;, considering that same &#8220;liberal media&#8221; is owned by six major corporations. Talk about put a spin on truth, all you have to do when something comes out that you don&#8217;t like is throw mud at the source, and the term &#8216;liberal&#8217; slants it in your favor just as &#8220;conservative&#8221; will slant it the oposite way for some. We should really call it corporate &#8220;advertising news&#8221;. The ONLY liberal media out there are the non-profits and some internet media sources. Anything seen or heard on the major media sources is anything but &#8216;liberal&#8221; or for that matter, complete truth. Read any conservative or for that matter, liberal news outlets and you will see the same issue arise. That is that the corporate lobbyists buy our politicians, regardless or their party. Lets face the facts. The corporations that profit from war, push us into war based on how the skew the news, and both parties follow like liitle hungry puppies, except they want their share of the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rawshark</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/09/23/secluding-palin/comment-page-1/#comment-14294</link>
		<dc:creator>rawshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/23/secluding-palin/#comment-14294</guid>
		<description>&#039;I donâ€™t quite understand what the McCain campaign thinks it is doing. &#039;

You must not know any right wing radio listeners.

How can keeping her away from the Obama/Soros press syndicate that only wants to rip into her unfairly because they hate real Americans and real American values hurt McCain? 

You think the people who already love her even though all she did was read a prepared script actually care if the &#039;Liberal media&#039; doesn&#039;t get to interview her? You sound reality based, that&#039;s what your problem is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;I donâ€™t quite understand what the McCain campaign thinks it is doing. &#8216;</p>
<p>You must not know any right wing radio listeners.</p>
<p>How can keeping her away from the Obama/Soros press syndicate that only wants to rip into her unfairly because they hate real Americans and real American values hurt McCain? </p>
<p>You think the people who already love her even though all she did was read a prepared script actually care if the &#8216;Liberal media&#8217; doesn&#8217;t get to interview her? You sound reality based, that&#8217;s what your problem is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

