The Endorsement


Richard makes many good points in his complaint about Ron Paul’s semi-endorsement of Barr, Baldwin, Nader and McKinney (Barr didn’t show for the press conference), but I would say that there was never any realistic chance that he was going to make his own third-party or independent run.  I say this with some confidence because Rep. Paul said that he wouldn’t do it months and months ago, and at the time I thought not running in the general election made the most sense.  If there were any chance that a Paul campaign in the general could win 20% of the vote (probably an overestimation), you can be sure that Paul would have been made the scapegoat for Republican defeat.  Instead of being held accountable for their failures, the GOP would have been able to explain away their defeat as an electoral fluke–never mind that a huge independent protest vote indicts the incumbent party for its failures–and nothing would change in terms of policy.  An independent Paul campaign in the general election would make his supporters feel better and would certainly affect the outcome of the election, but would mainly accomplish the election of Obama, for which Paul and his supporters would be held responsible.    

Besides, the prospects for third-party or independent candidates on the right have dimmed considerably in the last two weeks as the Palin nomination has worked its magic on anti-McCain conservatives.  Many of the undecided voters who were contemplating a protest vote in states across the South and the old Border states, where I thought a third-party candidate such as Barr might do unusually well, now seem to be swinging behind McCain in their Palinmania.  Perhaps they would have done so anyway even if Paul were in the race, but the reality is that Paul already missed whatever window of opportunity there was.  If there was a time to launch the independent campaign, it was six months ago, but the Paul campaign at that time was still pressing on to win delegates that, in the end, did not vote for Paul at the convention.  If this shows the futility of working within the GOP and trying to save it from itself, it also makes clear that the Revolution for this year had already concluded around February 5, when Paul made most of his largest gains in the caucus states in the Upper Plains and Northwest, or perhaps even earlier when he made the pledge not to run on a third-party ballot or as an independent.  Given Paul’s repeated pledge that he would not run, what I would have liked to see was an endorsement of either Barr or Baldwin or perhaps both together.  Instead, we have a muddled message that boils down to an “Anybody But The Major Parties” argument.   

Update: Barr held his own press conference.

Share      Filed under: politics

5 Responses to “The Endorsement”

  1. Seriously, Cynthia McKinney? That is just cussed contraianism for its own sake.

  2. Paul had stated in the past he would be unable to decide between Barr and Baldwin since he considers both men to be friends. Why he decided to invite Nader and McKinney is beyond me however.

  3. Dan,

    As the resident devoted Republican activist, I would to suggest that the Ron Paul Presidential campaign does not reflect on the futility of “working within the GOP and trying to save it from itself”, but rather the futility of doing anything with incompetence.

    Best,
    George

  4. I think the idea was to level a direct attack on duopolistic behavior by the major parties and advance the notion of 3rd party access in general. In that case, McKinney and Nader belonged there. I didn’t construe it as an endorsement of one platform or another, despite all the spin and anticipation about that being the purpose. As far as most are concerned, thats the only reason why RP is still worth listening to: He may have the power, through his endorsement, to significantly affect the outcome of the election. This power commands some level of attention, and without it he is completely obscure.

  5. That’s a fair point, George. No one could accuse the Paul campaign of being a crack team of strategic masterminds, to put it mildly.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.