Two Options
Imagine if we had kicked Russia out of the G8 and broken most ties with Moscow—as the Republican nominee, John McCain, and many neoconservatives have long wanted to do. Then, when the Russians attacked Georgia, we would have had only two options—appeasement or war. ~Fareed Zakaria
This is all true enough, but Zakaria seems to miss something here. This is always what will be left if you follow a foreign policy view that takes for granted that every international crisis can result in one of two things, namely appeasement or confrontation. The worldview that says removing means of outside leverage against Russia is “punishing” Russia is the same worldview that holds every accommodation and every attempt to pursue common interests through some measure of compromise to be weakness and surrender. A worldview geared towards ceaseless confrontation that defines anything other than ceaseless confrontation as spineless capitulation is a worldview that guarantees the clashes that it pretends are inevitable.




Now that sounds crazy to me and you (because it is), but from what I understand of neo-conservative “philosophy”, that sort of thinking is a feature not a bug.
I have a sinking feeling that Kristolites everywhere would nod their heads in happy agreement to your analysis. Sometimes I wonder if neo-conservatives read the Prince while high on some pscyhotropic drug, and then proceeded to use their drug-induced, highly distorted of Machiavelli to conduct foreign affairs.
Frankly, I think Machiavelli would find neo-cons too blood thirsty for his tastes.