<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Split Ticket</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/27/split-ticket-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/27/split-ticket-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=split-ticket-2</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: General Mobius</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/27/split-ticket-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11114</link>
		<dc:creator>General Mobius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/27/split-ticket-2/#comment-11114</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also worth noting that Lunsford is not exactly an ultra-progressive.  I would classify Markos&#039; feelings toward him as tepid at best.  Presumably that also helps in Kentucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also worth noting that Lunsford is not exactly an ultra-progressive.  I would classify Markos&#8217; feelings toward him as tepid at best.  Presumably that also helps in Kentucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam01</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/27/split-ticket-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11106</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/27/split-ticket-2/#comment-11106</guid>
		<description>Given the anti-Republican mood right now, voters who may not be inclined or comfortable in voting for Obama may hedge their bets and vote more strongly Democratic, even as they vote for McCain at the top of the ticket.

Or, conversely, the people of KY might just really, really dislike Mitch McConnell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the anti-Republican mood right now, voters who may not be inclined or comfortable in voting for Obama may hedge their bets and vote more strongly Democratic, even as they vote for McCain at the top of the ticket.</p>
<p>Or, conversely, the people of KY might just really, really dislike Mitch McConnell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Larison</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/27/split-ticket-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11103</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Larison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 18:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/27/split-ticket-2/#comment-11103</guid>
		<description>That makes a lot of sense, and given the political atmosphere this year I should have guessed earlier on that this would be the case.  It is reminiscent of voting patterns in many parts of the country during the &#039;80s, and it&#039;s a useful reminder that the people who are still registered Democrats in these states are quite willing to back Democratic candidates at the federal level under the right conditions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes a lot of sense, and given the political atmosphere this year I should have guessed earlier on that this would be the case.  It is reminiscent of voting patterns in many parts of the country during the &#8217;80s, and it&#8217;s a useful reminder that the people who are still registered Democrats in these states are quite willing to back Democratic candidates at the federal level under the right conditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: General Mobius</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/27/split-ticket-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11102</link>
		<dc:creator>General Mobius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 18:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/27/split-ticket-2/#comment-11102</guid>
		<description>I was reading someone today (can&#039;t remember who) who argued (somewhat sensibly, maybe) that it will be easier to flip this seat if Obama is unpopular there.  McConnell will be less able to get traction against Lunsford if he can&#039;t cast him as a rubber stamp for the Obama agenda.  Or: it&#039;s easier for a conservative to pull the lever for a Democratic Senator if he&#039;s simultaneously pulling the lever for a Republican President to counterbalance the Democrats&#039; influence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading someone today (can&#8217;t remember who) who argued (somewhat sensibly, maybe) that it will be easier to flip this seat if Obama is unpopular there.  McConnell will be less able to get traction against Lunsford if he can&#8217;t cast him as a rubber stamp for the Obama agenda.  Or: it&#8217;s easier for a conservative to pull the lever for a Democratic Senator if he&#8217;s simultaneously pulling the lever for a Republican President to counterbalance the Democrats&#8217; influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

