<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Culture Wins (Again)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=culture-wins-again</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eunomia &#187; It&#8217;s More Like A Marriage Chasm</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/comment-page-1/#comment-11549</link>
		<dc:creator>Eunomia &#187; It&#8217;s More Like A Marriage Chasm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/#comment-11549</guid>
		<description>[...] The age and party affiliationÂ table from the latest Pew survey shows the demographics of party identification in great detail.Â  Pay attention especially to the marriage gap in the very bottom of that table: among 18-29 year olds, where the greatest gap between the two parties is to be found (58-33 D/R overall), there is essentially no gap among married people (44-43), but among the unmarried it remains a vast 30-point difference that benefits the Democrats (61-31).Â  As the overall number suggests, there are far more unmarried than married 18-29 year olds and significantly more than there have been in previous generations.Â  This is consistent with what others have been finding, and helpsÂ confirm one of the basic structural reasons why the GOP continues to have as much support as it still doesÂ and why its future in its current formÂ is extremely bleak.Â  Â Â Â Â Â  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The age and party affiliationÂ table from the latest Pew survey shows the demographics of party identification in great detail.Â  Pay attention especially to the marriage gap in the very bottom of that table: among 18-29 year olds, where the greatest gap between the two parties is to be found (58-33 D/R overall), there is essentially no gap among married people (44-43), but among the unmarried it remains a vast 30-point difference that benefits the Democrats (61-31).Â  As the overall number suggests, there are far more unmarried than married 18-29 year olds and significantly more than there have been in previous generations.Â  This is consistent with what others have been finding, and helpsÂ confirm one of the basic structural reasons why the GOP continues to have as much support as it still doesÂ and why its future in its current formÂ is extremely bleak.Â  Â Â Â Â Â  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedschan</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/comment-page-1/#comment-10375</link>
		<dc:creator>tedschan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 15:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/#comment-10375</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Now, of course, the future of any political party with power adhering to small government philosophy is profoundly bleak. Of course, that has been the case since the Great Society, but it seems that this philosophyâ€™s last dying gasps will occur in the next decade.&lt;/i&gt;

That does seem likely, but it&#039;s lamentable nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Now, of course, the future of any political party with power adhering to small government philosophy is profoundly bleak. Of course, that has been the case since the Great Society, but it seems that this philosophyâ€™s last dying gasps will occur in the next decade.</i></p>
<p>That does seem likely, but it&#8217;s lamentable nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grigory</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/comment-page-1/#comment-10373</link>
		<dc:creator>grigory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 07:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/#comment-10373</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that the end of cultural conservatism is nigh. Even in my hometown of Long Beach, a suburb of Los Angeles, I noticed a substantial pro-life sentiment among my classmates - something that was not often shared by faculty members. Can you really say that people of my generation are any more liberal than, say, the youth of 1968?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that the end of cultural conservatism is nigh. Even in my hometown of Long Beach, a suburb of Los Angeles, I noticed a substantial pro-life sentiment among my classmates &#8211; something that was not often shared by faculty members. Can you really say that people of my generation are any more liberal than, say, the youth of 1968?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaloren</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/comment-page-1/#comment-10360</link>
		<dc:creator>jaloren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 16:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/#comment-10360</guid>
		<description>While I am a liberal who views this party identification as mostly salutary, I would add a cautionary note to my liberal brethren and a ray of hope to cultural conservatives. 

Fusionism as a basis for a political coalition has fallen apart. This shouldn&#039;t be surprising; what&#039;s amazing is that such a paradoxical partnership between social conservatives and corporatists lasted so long. 

However, like any well functioning market, political parties will change in order to maintain or gain power (e.g. Democrats in the 1990&#039;s).  In the near future, the Republican party&#039;s prospects to hold political power are dire.  But as Republicans loose power and loose their leaders, unorthodox candidates and philosophies will start to emerge. At some point the Republican party will find a philosophy that will garner electoral support and political power.  

While its too soon to tell what kind of philosophy the Republican party will adhere to (this process will probably take a generation at least), I believe that Huckabee and Huckabeeism is the Republican party&#039;s future.  

What progressives and liberals have forgotten (to their peril), is that cultural conservativism is enormously popular--it is Grover Norquist and the corporatists that are held in ill favor by the electorate. Combine Huckabee with right-wing economic populism and you would find a very formidable political coalition. 

Now, of course, the future of any political party with  power adhering to small government philosophy is profoundly bleak.  Of course, that has been the case since the Great Society, but it seems that this philosophy&#039;s last dying gasps will occur in the next decade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am a liberal who views this party identification as mostly salutary, I would add a cautionary note to my liberal brethren and a ray of hope to cultural conservatives. </p>
<p>Fusionism as a basis for a political coalition has fallen apart. This shouldn&#8217;t be surprising; what&#8217;s amazing is that such a paradoxical partnership between social conservatives and corporatists lasted so long. </p>
<p>However, like any well functioning market, political parties will change in order to maintain or gain power (e.g. Democrats in the 1990&#8242;s).  In the near future, the Republican party&#8217;s prospects to hold political power are dire.  But as Republicans loose power and loose their leaders, unorthodox candidates and philosophies will start to emerge. At some point the Republican party will find a philosophy that will garner electoral support and political power.  </p>
<p>While its too soon to tell what kind of philosophy the Republican party will adhere to (this process will probably take a generation at least), I believe that Huckabee and Huckabeeism is the Republican party&#8217;s future.  </p>
<p>What progressives and liberals have forgotten (to their peril), is that cultural conservativism is enormously popular&#8211;it is Grover Norquist and the corporatists that are held in ill favor by the electorate. Combine Huckabee with right-wing economic populism and you would find a very formidable political coalition. </p>
<p>Now, of course, the future of any political party with  power adhering to small government philosophy is profoundly bleak.  Of course, that has been the case since the Great Society, but it seems that this philosophy&#8217;s last dying gasps will occur in the next decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/comment-page-1/#comment-10357</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 16:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/#comment-10357</guid>
		<description>Another cultural factor to consider, which has gotten a good deal of attention lately (e.g. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200803/subprime&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;), is the trend toward desuburbanization. Conservatives - by which I don&#039;t mean Republicans, mind you - have got to find ways to make this shift compatible with pursuing a pro-family agenda; continuing to hitch themselves to suburbia, as opposed e.g. to working to make - and show people how to make - urban areas into places where families can thrive, is the last sort of strategy conservatives ought to embrace if they want to have any sort of political (or cultural!) future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another cultural factor to consider, which has gotten a good deal of attention lately (e.g. <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200803/subprime" rel="nofollow">here</a>), is the trend toward desuburbanization. Conservatives &#8211; by which I don&#8217;t mean Republicans, mind you &#8211; have got to find ways to make this shift compatible with pursuing a pro-family agenda; continuing to hitch themselves to suburbia, as opposed e.g. to working to make &#8211; and show people how to make &#8211; urban areas into places where families can thrive, is the last sort of strategy conservatives ought to embrace if they want to have any sort of political (or cultural!) future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy Old Man</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/comment-page-1/#comment-10356</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpy Old Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/#comment-10356</guid>
		<description>Will the decline in house prices make family formation more affordable and help the GOP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the decline in house prices make family formation more affordable and help the GOP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisgbr</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/comment-page-1/#comment-10355</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisgbr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/#comment-10355</guid>
		<description>After an era when Gingrich put an end to unconditional AFDC benefits for those having children out of wedlock, Bush held firm in the defense of ethical constraints to ensure that the biotechnological revolution serves rather than enslaves human dignity, and Giuliani put an end to the mau-mauing of urban agitators, how can you claim that the GOP &quot;never saw fit to do much more than strike poses about culture change&quot;?!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After an era when Gingrich put an end to unconditional AFDC benefits for those having children out of wedlock, Bush held firm in the defense of ethical constraints to ensure that the biotechnological revolution serves rather than enslaves human dignity, and Giuliani put an end to the mau-mauing of urban agitators, how can you claim that the GOP &#8220;never saw fit to do much more than strike poses about culture change&#8221;?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Piatak</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/comment-page-1/#comment-10353</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Piatak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 14:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/02/culture-wins-again/#comment-10353</guid>
		<description>Outstanding analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outstanding analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

