<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama &#8217;08: The Path To An Even Bigger Disaster?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2007/08/08/obama-08-the-path-to-an-even-bigger-disaster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2007/08/08/obama-08-the-path-to-an-even-bigger-disaster/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obama-08-the-path-to-an-even-bigger-disaster</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pithlord</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2007/08/08/obama-08-the-path-to-an-even-bigger-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-7479</link>
		<dc:creator>Pithlord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larison.org/2007/08/08/obama-08-the-path-to-an-even-bigger-disaster/#comment-7479</guid>
		<description>The more I think about it, the less sure I am that you are right. Obviously, a mission like this would be very high risk and much would depend on tactical competence. But unlike the Iraq war, there would be a real connection to American self-defence and that would make a big difference in global opinion. I don&#039;t think keeping Musharraf in power is such a big priority -- in fact, a major problem with American foreign policy is how big a stake it puts on the survival of particular domestic politicians (see Yeltsin, Boris).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I think about it, the less sure I am that you are right. Obviously, a mission like this would be very high risk and much would depend on tactical competence. But unlike the Iraq war, there would be a real connection to American self-defence and that would make a big difference in global opinion. I don&#8217;t think keeping Musharraf in power is such a big priority &#8212; in fact, a major problem with American foreign policy is how big a stake it puts on the survival of particular domestic politicians (see Yeltsin, Boris).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jb1125</title>
		<link>http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2007/08/08/obama-08-the-path-to-an-even-bigger-disaster/comment-page-1/#comment-7477</link>
		<dc:creator>jb1125</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 05:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larison.org/2007/08/08/obama-08-the-path-to-an-even-bigger-disaster/#comment-7477</guid>
		<description>See this memo by Samantha Power: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/08/03/campaign_memo_barack_obama_was_1.html

And look how Richard A. Clarke, former White House counterterrorism official, who has briefed Obama on terrorism related issues, responded: I believe his speech is a comprehensive, sophisticated approach to terrorism. I was glad to see it recognized the importance of stopping repressive police and intelligence activities in countries threatened by al-Qaeda and terrorism. I&#039;m also glad to see him say clearly that we are not at war with Islam but must partner with Muslims threatened by al-Qaeda. On Pakistan, I think it must be true anywhere that if we know of high value targets and the host government will not act, we have to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See this memo by Samantha Power: <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/08/03/campaign_memo_barack_obama_was_1.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/08/03/campaign_memo_barack_obama_was_1.html</a></p>
<p>And look how Richard A. Clarke, former White House counterterrorism official, who has briefed Obama on terrorism related issues, responded: I believe his speech is a comprehensive, sophisticated approach to terrorism. I was glad to see it recognized the importance of stopping repressive police and intelligence activities in countries threatened by al-Qaeda and terrorism. I&#8217;m also glad to see him say clearly that we are not at war with Islam but must partner with Muslims threatened by al-Qaeda. On Pakistan, I think it must be true anywhere that if we know of high value targets and the host government will not act, we have to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

