Posted on September 30th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
The folks at The Weekly Standard don’t know when to quit. Not cowed by the established public record that the Iraqi government under Hussein had no substantive relationship with al-Qaeda, and not embarrassed by the manifest falsehood of claims to the contrary, the Standard has rehashed much old news (why, did you know that Hussein encouraged [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on September 28th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
Tom DeLay, the Republican majority leader in the US House of Representatives, has been charged with criminal conspiracy by a grand jury in Texas. Mr DeLay has relinquished his post but not his seat in Congress. The second-ranking, and most assertive Republican leader, was accused of a criminal conspiracy with two associates, John Colyandro, a [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on September 28th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
Indeed, the administration’s mixed signals, alternately condemning and lauding the regime, have done little to rein in the Janjaweed marauders who keep the Darfur people from leaving fetid camps to plant crops and rebuild their shattered villages. And one reason the administration has not acted more forcefully is that the potent Christian groups involved in [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on September 27th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
Turkey did murder about 2,000,000 Armenians and 350,000 Greeks, the first such extensive genocide of the last century (the first was the German slaughter of 65,000 Herero in Namibia in 1904). I know, I know, my figure of Armenian’s murdered far surpasses the 1,500,000 most often given by Armenian and genocide scholars, but they are [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on September 23rd, 2005 by Daniel Larison
As a very brief follow-up to the last post, I wanted to add a separate observation. Mr. Rummel’s simplistic theory of “democratic peace” reveals something about democrats and democratists that is not often commented on. There is in this theory the naive faith that there is a type of regime that guarantees an end to [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on September 23rd, 2005 by Daniel Larison
How do we know this? Because we know empirically from history and verified theory that democracies don’t make war on each other, and therefore we can predict that between any two democracies there will be no future war. However, war can well occur between two if one or both are not democracies. Moreover, the probability [...]
Filed under: Uncategorized
Posted on September 23rd, 2005 by Daniel Larison
According to Justin Raimondo, the Cato Institute has sent its defense policy studies director, Charles V. Pena, packing: The earlier purge of Ivan Eland, who is now with the Independent Institute – and a regular Antiwar.com columnist – was a portent of things to come, and Pena’s departure is but the latest sign that Cato [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on September 21st, 2005 by Daniel Larison
This would be admirable if it were true. But we are not providing security in southern Iraq. The rescue mission to free two undercover soldiers from the clutches of local gunmen was a measure of how anarchic Basra has become. The police ignored both the Army and their own national government when requested to hand [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on September 21st, 2005 by Daniel Larison
[Michael] Oakeshott didn’t have a political program and never trusted those who did. His bête noire was what he called “rationalism in politics” (the phrase became the title of a book of his elegant essays) — the desire to use government for ends it could never achieve, at least not without sacrificing the good it [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on September 21st, 2005 by Daniel Larison
Most perverse among the war essays (and it was a strong field) is David Gelertner’s “The Holocaust Shrug.” The catalogue of Saddam’s crimes and the fact that we could stop him from committing them is argument enough for intervention. To not exult in our victory is morally equivalent to shrugging at the Holocaust. What is [...]
Filed under: politics