Daniel Larison

Posts tagged “Dan Drezner”

Using Trump to Troll Realists

Most realists have no further need to distance themselves publicly from Trump because they already did so months ago.

Posted August 16th, 2016

Will the Neoconservatives Abandon the GOP?

The GOP still isn’t going to be a “party of ideas” until it starts adapting its policy agenda to address contemporary problems.

Posted April 19th, 2016

Trump and Obama Aren’t Realists

Trump and Obama may end up taking a few positions that realists share, but they are doing so for their own reasons and usually with very different assumptions about how the world works.

Posted April 13th, 2016

Trump’s Missing Foreign Policy Advisers

This may not be a major problem at the moment, it will become one if it continues to fester.

Posted March 9th, 2016

How the GOP Failed to Stop Trump

Anti-Trump Republicans have had excessive confidence in Trump’s non-viability even when the evidence kept telling them they should rethink their assumptions.

Posted February 23rd, 2016

Realists and the Trump Trap

Maybe realists think backing Trump is the sort of short-sighted and ill-considered course of action that they are warning other people against all the time.

Posted February 3rd, 2016

Should Realists Support Trump?

There are many reasons why realists wouldn’t want to get behind Trump.

Posted February 1st, 2016

The Nuclear Deal and the Ten Sailors

The episode was resolved as quickly and peacefully as it was because of the direct channels of communication created by the diplomatic exchanges over the nuclear issue.

Posted January 13th, 2016

Rubio and Bush’s Foreign Policy Debate Errors

Bush and Rubio made several errors on foreign policy last night.

Posted December 16th, 2015

Cruz’s “Anything But Obama” Approach to Regime Change

The only consistency in Cruz’s approach to these issues is that he is always against whatever Obama did.

Posted December 15th, 2015

Rubio and the Coalition Against ISIS

Rubio would find that our allies and clients are even less willing to risk taking casualties in a ground war, and his “multinational coalition” would also be one in name only.

Posted December 7th, 2015

Syria and the 2016 Race

The leading candidates don’t appear to be willing to commit the U.S. to a new ground war.

Posted December 1st, 2015

Why We Should Take Foreign Policy Pledges Seriously

We shouldn’t assume that candidates are merely indulging in empty rhetoric.

Posted October 15th, 2015

An Even Better Question for Syria Hawks

The most important question that hawks can’t answer: “How are American interests protected and advanced by taking sides in Syria’s civil war?”

Posted October 12th, 2015

Tom Cotton and the Hawkish Syria Panic

Russia’s deeper involvement in Syria’s civil war isn’t a “near catastrophe” for U.S. foreign policy.

Posted October 1st, 2015

The 2016 Republicans’ Foreign Policy Experience, Or Lack Thereof

The current Republican field is filled with candidates that don’t have much foreign policy experience at all.

Posted September 23rd, 2015

Is Rubio’s Foreign Policy “Savvy”?

When Rubio sees a foreign conflict, he looks for ways to escalate it and to increase U.S. involvement in it.

Posted September 21st, 2015