The administration's response to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill has only made things worse, contends TAC associate publisher Jon Basil Utley. As ever, government is seizing the opportunity presented by a crisis to expand its power -- in this case abetted by the ideologues of the green movement. (See also Brendan O'Neill's "Green Industrial Complex" for more on the strengthening ties between government and environmentalist lobby.)

Oil Spill Turns Power Play

By Jon Basil Utley

Incompetence has turned the Gulf oil tragedy into “Obama’s Katrina.” As more and more startling facts emerge we are finding almost criminal ineptness by Washington compounded by BP’s almost criminal negligence. As with many crises, Washington’s reactions cause greater damage than the event itself. Yet lurking in the mess are the extreme environmentalists staffing the Obama Administration with their declared agenda of shutting down all offshore oil drilling. The Sierra Club has bragged about how it helped shut down all new coal generating electricity plants. Other environmentalists are still happy that the Three Mile Island crisis succeeded in ending all new nuclear-generating power plants. Preventing new offshore oil drilling in Alaska is another of their primary objectives.

Now CNN reports that almost all new drilling activity has been suspended for over two months. This includes shallow wells in less than 500 feet of water—despite Obama’s statement that such wells would not be affected by his orders to cease all deep-water (over 1,000 feet) drilling. After thousands of deep-water wells have been drilled successfully without spills, the Interior Department, under Secretary Ken Salazar, has so delayed permitting and continuing operations as to possibly bring financial ruin to countless smaller companies. It would be similar to shutting down all airlines after a single crash. It may be that Salazar and his gang are just so ignorant of business that they think the government can simply shut down the super-sophisticated flow of supplies and men and then later restart it like flipping an electric light switch. It’s already estimated that it will take two years or longer to get Gulf production back to its pre-suspension levels. Meanwhile, deep-water drilling rigs—which cost over half a million dollars per day to operate—are being sent away from the Gulf to work in Africa and Asia where they are wanted. It will take months, if not years, to bring them back. Some 100,000 high-paying jobs are now at risk. Already the number of deep-water rigs has dropped from 42 to 19.

Most startling is the news that large boat skimmers could have sucked up much of the spill and cleansed it long before the oil reached shore. At the outset of the spill the Dutch offered skimmer boats with experienced crews that could have handled most of the spill. As The Christian Science Monitor reported in “The Top Five Bottlenecks”:

Three days after the accident, the Dutch government offered advanced skimming equipment capable of sucking up oiled water, separating out most of the oil, and returning the cleaner water to the Gulf. But citing discharge regulations that demand that 99.9985 percent of the returned water is oil-free, the EPA initially turned down the offer. A month into the crisis, the EPA backed off those regulations, and the Dutch equipment was airlifted to the Gulf.

A giant Taiwanese oil skimming ship, The A Whale, is only now working on the spill. It can process 500,000 barrels of oily seawater per day, but it also needed the same waiver from the EPA which, expressed in another way, limits discharged water to trace amounts of less than 15 parts-per-million of oil residue. It also needed a waiver from the Jones Act, which prevents the use of specialized foreign ships from the North Sea oil fields because they use non-American crews. Previously, the skimmers had to return to port to offload almost pure seawater each time they filled up with water.

Read Full Article...


© 2012 Reason

 

 


Are Libertarians Part of the Conservative Movement?
By Matthew Feeney - February 09, 2012

The American Conservative at CPAC
By Matthew Feeney - February 08, 2012
Comments: 2

Is Santorum Pat Buchanan 2.0?
By Daniel McCarthy - February 08, 2012
Comments: 15

More


Obama and Missile Defense
February 09, 2012

Rubio's Iran Hyperbole
February 09, 2012 - Comments: 2

Russia Still Isn't Going to Abandon Assad
February 09, 2012 - Comments: 2

What Would Arming the Syrian Opposition Achieve?
February 09, 2012 - Comments: 1

More


Identity Versus Philosophy
June 20, 2011

Ron Paul Won the Debate
June 15, 2011 - Comments: 4
More


Nicholas Wade on the Trade-Offs of Editing
December 20, 2011 - Comments: 1

Balls of the Moth
November 20, 2011 - Comments: 1

More



Detroit Misses the Train (Again)
By GLEN D. BOTTOMS

The Word From the UK
By WILLIAM S. LIND

 

 

 

Using technology licensed from Unz.org, one or more U.S. and foreign patents pending
Letters@amconmag.com
The American Conservative
4040 Fairfax Drive Suite 140
Arlington, VA 22203