Each bailout is spun by our overlords as an unpleasant but absolutely unavoidable measure. However, the proposed $23 billion Teacher Bailout is anything but. The money is said to be needed to rehire good teachers who lost their jobs due to the economic crisis. But a closer look at the situation reveals that these layoffs were preventable and federal dollars aren't needed to rehire the teachers. Steve Moore examines the case of Milwaukee, where the teachers union's intransigence has bankrupt the public schools and cost good teachers their jobs.

Teacher Bailout is Unnecessary

By Stephen Moore

The Obama administration is pressuring Congress to spend $23 billion to rehire the more than 100,000 teachers who have been laid off across the country. Before Congress succumbs, it should know about the unfolding fiasco in Milwaukee. Wisconsin is a microcosm of the union intransigence that's fueling the school funding crisis in so many cities and states and leading to so many pink slips. It also shows why a federal bailout is a mistake.

Because of declining tax collections and falling enrollment, Milwaukee's school board announced in June that 428 teachers were losing their jobs—including Megan Sampson, who was just awarded a teacher-of-the-year prize. Yet the teachers union, the Milwaukee Teachers Education Association, had it within its power to avert almost all of the layoffs.

The average pay for a Milwaukee school teacher is $56,000, which is hardly excessive. Benefits are another matter. According to a new study by the MacIver Institute, a state think tank, the cost of health and pension benefits now exceeds $40,000 a year per teacher—bringing total compensation to $100,500.

The current health plan costs taxpayers $26,844 per family, compared to the typical $14,500 cost for a private employer family plan. The plan does not require teachers to pay any premiums toward the cost of the health plan—a situation that is all but extinct in private employment. In the spring, the school board offered a new health plan that would reduce costs to $17,172 per family. The plan would have saved money by requiring co-pays.

According to a budget analysis the MacIver Institute obtained from the Milwaukee public school system, shifting teachers to the plan offered by the school board could have saved $47.2 million. This would have prevented, according to the report, the lay offs of "approximately 480 teachers"—more than the number that ultimately lost their jobs. But when union officials were presented the option, they chose to allow their members to be dismissed.

Read Full Article...


© 2012 The Wall Street Journal

 

 


The American Conservative at CPAC
By Matthew Feeney - February 08, 2012

Is Santorum Pat Buchanan 2.0?
By Daniel McCarthy - February 08, 2012
Comments: 11

Some Good News From the European Commission
By Matthew Feeney - February 07, 2012
Comments: 4

More


NBC Report: Israel and the MEK Responsible for Deaths of Iranian Nuclear Scientists
February 09, 2012

Romney and Santorum on Foreign Policy
February 08, 2012 - Comments: 2

Who Would Want to Live on the Moon Anyway?
February 08, 2012 - Comments: 5

No, Yesterday Was Not Super Tuesday
February 08, 2012 - Comments: 4

More


Identity Versus Philosophy
June 20, 2011

Ron Paul Won the Debate
June 15, 2011 - Comments: 4
More


Nicholas Wade on the Trade-Offs of Editing
December 20, 2011 - Comments: 1

Balls of the Moth
November 20, 2011 - Comments: 1

More



Detroit Misses the Train (Again)
By GLEN D. BOTTOMS

The Word From the UK
By WILLIAM S. LIND

 

 

 

Using technology licensed from Unz.org, one or more U.S. and foreign patents pending
Letters@amconmag.com
The American Conservative
4040 Fairfax Drive Suite 140
Arlington, VA 22203